Asharq Al-awsat English Middle-east and International News and Opinion from Asharq Al-awsat Newspaper

Idlib Awaits the Great Massacre

Idlib Awaits the Great Massacre

Saturday, 1 September, 2018 - 11:45
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed
Abdulrahman Al-Rashed is the former general manager of Al-Arabiya television. He is also the former editor-in-chief of Asharq Al-Awsat, and the leading Arabic weekly magazine Al-Majalla. He is also a senior columnist in the daily newspapers Al-Madina and Al-Bilad.

Militants in the Idlib province and its vicinity are sharpening their knives and cleaning their rifles in preparation for the great, and maybe final, battle of Syria’s war.

On one side, there are eight Russian navy ships equipped with cruise missiles, tens of thousands of Syrian regime troops and Iran’s multinational militias; while on the other is the so-called Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS), which includes: Al-Nusra Front, Khalid ibn Al-Walid Army, Jund Al-Sharia, Saraya Al-Sahel and Jaysh Al-Malahim, all of which are terrorist organizations and, ideologically, extensions of Al-Qaeda. Moreover, the leaders of most of these organizations are not Syrian, such as Abu Mariya Al-Jubouri Al-Qahtani, Abu Al-Yaqdhan Al-Masri and Al-Farghali.

The two parties fighting in Idlib, i.e. the Syrian regime and its allies the Iranian militias versus HTS, are the culprits who brought destruction and bloodshed to Syria during the past seven years. They have avoided direct clashes in the past, as each needed the other in this war. The terror groups have given legitimacy to the regime and polished its image, while the regime, by massacring and displacing millions of civilians – often for sectarian reasons – has given terror groups the incentive and publicity to recruit militants from across the world in order to fight in a horrendous sectarian war.

Most of the previous battles waged by both parties targeted the Free Syrian Army (FSA), which has never included foreign militants or used extremist slogans, but posed the real threat to the regime as it was the national alternative supported by the West and the region’s states.

Idlib, which borders Turkey, eventually became a refuge for extremists who fled eastern and southern Syria toward the Turkish border. As for Turkey, it has closed its border in their faces and mobilized its troops to stop infiltrators and fugitives. Today, Idlib’s worst fate is looming as a result of the massive military build-up and concerns have increased after Russia’s warnings of imminent chemical attacks. These warnings made many question Russia’s motives and expect its forces, along with those of the Syrian regime, to commit such a crime, based on previous experiences.

Amid this alarming situation, more than three million people live in Idlib, half of whom are not locals but displaced people who took refuge there after fleeing the attacks of either the Iranian militias or ISIS and its likes. Inhabitants are not allowed to leave the province’s cities and towns because are being used as human shields and hostages against intense military attacks. Therefore, if the war erupts in Idlib in the next few days - as the Iranians, Syrian regime and Russian military leaders are warning - we may witness the greatest massacre in the history of Syria’s war. This is what made UN special envoy and mediator, Staffan de Mistura, say that it would be a “tragic irony” at the end of the war with a “most horrific tragedy” involving large numbers of civilians.

However, it was both disappointing and surprising that the UN envoy made justifications and provocative statements when he claimed that there were 10,000 terrorists in Idlib. Indeed, there is a large number of HTS militants, but the exact figure de Mistura has mentioned seems grossly exaggerated unless he possesses accurate and detailed information, which he then must present to the media. Furthermore, when he said he feared that “the two sides” would use chemical weapons, the Russians and the Syrian regime celebrated his statement, claiming terrorists were preparing to carry out such attacks. Again, if de Mistura really possessed solid information about such attacks, he must bring it forward, instead of making general statements that lay the groundwork for future crimes.

We heard before the regime’s claims about terror groups being the ones who used chlorine gas and other prohibited weapons, but all conclusive evidence proved that the regime was the only side that had used these weapons. This does not mean that HTS was innocent of committing horrendous crimes against civilians, but it wasn’t known for possessing or using such weapons – at least in its previously documented attacks.

Other opinion articles

Editor Picks