Saudi Ambassador to US Calls for Confronting Iran’s Malign Behavior

Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince Khalid bin Salman. (SPA)
Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince Khalid bin Salman. (SPA)
TT

Saudi Ambassador to US Calls for Confronting Iran’s Malign Behavior

Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince Khalid bin Salman. (SPA)
Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince Khalid bin Salman. (SPA)

Saudi Ambassador to the United States Prince Khalid bin Salman called on Monday for confronting Iran’s malign behavior, instead of appeasing it.

He said in an article published by Arab News that it “is encouraging to hear US President Donald Trump make clear that we will not approach Iran with the sort of appeasement policies that failed so miserably to halt Nazi Germany’s rise to power, or avert the costliest war ever waged.”

He therefore called for supporting a broader strategy that would tackle the Iranian regime’s destabilizing regional policy.

“At a time of thunderous echoes of the 1930s — the sustained fallout from an economic crisis, extreme polarization of the political spectrum from the far right to the hard left, inaction from the global community and malignant actors determined to fill a void in leadership by spreading their ideology of hate and violence — it is incumbent on the global community to act with resolve. As the philosopher George Santayana famously declared: ‘Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.’ In the appeasement of Iran, we are clearly seeing something we have seen before. It is equally obvious that the strategy has already failed,” added the ambassador.

“Despite the best intentions of its architects, the 2015 nuclear deal and subsequent easing of financial restrictions on Tehran did nothing to stem the regime’s expansionist ambitions or eliminate its support for the Middle East’s most destabilizing extremists — in Syria, Yemen, Lebanon and elsewhere. Instead, it served only to grant the world’s most egregious sponsor of global terrorism rewards for temporarily suspending its apocalyptic pursuit of nuclear weapons.

“The deal was but part of a worrying pattern of appeasement. As Iran threw more and more economic and military muscle behind the murderous regime of Syria’s Bashar Assad, it was not punished. Instead, governments responded by offering Tehran a seat at successive Syrian peace tables. The result was predictable: No peace, and nothing that resembled a more accommodating Iran, which to this day stands by Assad, one chemical weapons attack after the next.

“Whatever your position on the US withdrawal from the nuclear deal, we all should now answer a higher calling: Deterring Iran and its minions from their campaign of chaos. Even leaders who sought to salvage the nuclear deal recognize the importance of combating Iran now… As other nations and their peoples weigh the matter, it is worth considering the abundant and disturbing parallels between 2018 and 1938,” said Prince Khalid.

“The pernicious threat posed by Iran is at the core of its regime. The Iranian constitution calls for spreading ‘the ideological mission of jihad’ throughout the world. And from its first days, Ruhollah Khomeini exhorted his followers to conquer Muslim and non-Muslim land alike,” he continued.

“The Iranian state ideology is based on the concept of Wilayat Al-Faqih, a guardianship-based political system in which the people owe their allegiance to a supreme religious jurist (who also becomes the Supreme Leader) regardless of their nationality, geography or form of government. This supra-national doctrine aims to undermine the influence of legitimate state government by theocratic rule, and does not recognize the legitimate international order of governments. But is religion really at the heart of Iran’s interpretation of Wilayat Al-Faqih? If it were, then why wouldn’t a Supreme Leader emerge from Iraq’s religious centers, and under Wilayat Al-Faqih the people of Iran would pledge allegiance to him?” he asked.

“After almost four decades of malfeasance, we know the Iranian playbook. Tehran promotes sectarianism to divide communities. That leads to weakened or failed nations, which Iran then controls through proxy organizations,” he stressed.

“The lack of concrete reactions to these activities, and the fading of ‘red lines’ in Syria, made the Iranian view clear: The US — and the world — was handcuffed and had only words of condemnation in response. That message is changing now and we believe President Trump when he says: ‘The United States no longer makes empty threats.’”

Prince Khalid blamed the current situation in the region to the international community’s policy of appeasing Iran.

“The Iranian regime’s foreign minister Mohammed Javad Zarif desperately attempts to present a moderate face outside his country. He doesn’t even try at home, where such networks are banned, demonstrating that what he says is mere lip service to the West. President Hassan Rouhani similarly seeks to beguile the world with talk of reformers who might one day replace the ‘hardliners’ holding the levers of Iranian power. It is an elaborate ruse from leaders who are part of, and benefit from, the same system of repression,” he charged.

“Five years into Rouhani’s presidency, the West’s policy of appeasement to ‘empower’ him clearly has not done much good for ordinary Iranians,” he added.

“The Iranians are a civilized people and want the same things that we all want, a better quality of life and a better future for themselves and their children. But as the Kingdom’s Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman pointed out, the Iranian regime has not invested in a single road or major civil project since the nuclear agreement was signed,” stated the ambassador.

“Those who have not learned history’s lessons counsel us to let the Iranians subvert the entire Middle East while granting them as many financial enticements as possible. The rationale has been to preserve a nuclear deal that has done nothing to resolve the region’s troubles, and appeal to the Iranian regime’s better angels. A wiser and ultimately more moral approach is to pressure Iran to correct its awful behavior immediately.

“As Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has emphasized repeatedly, standing up to the forces of aggression may entail more cost in the short term. But it is the only real strategy for preventing already grave threats to snowball into wider, and potentially far deadlier, conflicts. ‘We will not repeat an agreement that was reached in 1938 and that led later to the Second World War,’ the crown prince said in Paris this year at a conference with President Emmanuel Macron.”

“Following the path of appeasement will lead countries in the region to lose faith in international law. They will see that proxy militias can be tools of foreign policy, unchecked by the world community. They will change and adapt to this new reality — and not for the better, I fear. We cannot pass the buck and hope things get better. Committing to a firm policy of containing Iran, and all its mischievous activity, will solve more problems than just saying: ‘Something must be done.’”

“The world must join us to confront Iran with seriousness and intent. Iran needs to know it will pay a price if it continues to violate international law and interfere in the affairs of its neighbors. Iran must be punished economically and diplomatically, with all options kept on the table to ensure the strength and integrity of diplomacy. And the Middle East’s legitimate state institutions — in Yemen, Iraq and elsewhere — need to be supported as they fight Iran’s proxies of chaos.

“Only such a course of action will allow the seeds of modernization, growth, and innovation to flourish across the Middle East. Saudi Arabia will do its part. We need as many partners as possible,” said Prince Khalid.

Comparing Saudi Arabia with Iran, he remarked: “Those who adhere to terrorism and violent extremism are but a small minority in both Saudi Arabia and Iran. The difference is that in Saudi Arabia these terrorists are on the run, while in Iran they are running the country.”



Trump Announces 3-day Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire

 US President Donald J Trump makes remarks at an event he is hosting for a group including Gold Star Mothers and Angel Mothers to honor Mother’s Day 2026, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 08 May 2026.  EPA/AARON SCHWARTZ / POOL
US President Donald J Trump makes remarks at an event he is hosting for a group including Gold Star Mothers and Angel Mothers to honor Mother’s Day 2026, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 08 May 2026. EPA/AARON SCHWARTZ / POOL
TT

Trump Announces 3-day Russia-Ukraine Ceasefire

 US President Donald J Trump makes remarks at an event he is hosting for a group including Gold Star Mothers and Angel Mothers to honor Mother’s Day 2026, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 08 May 2026.  EPA/AARON SCHWARTZ / POOL
US President Donald J Trump makes remarks at an event he is hosting for a group including Gold Star Mothers and Angel Mothers to honor Mother’s Day 2026, in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, USA, 08 May 2026. EPA/AARON SCHWARTZ / POOL

US President Donald Trump said Friday the leaders of Russia and Ukraine have agreed to his request for a three-day ceasefire and an exchange of prisoners, saying it could be the “beginning of the end” of the long war between them.

Trump announced on social media that the ceasefire would run Saturday through Monday.

“I am pleased to announce that there will be a THREE DAY CEASEFIRE (May 9th, 10th, and 11th) in the War between Russia and Ukraine,” Trump wrote.

“The Celebration in Russia is for Victory Day but, likewise, in Ukraine, because they were also a big part and factor of World War II.”

The Republican president said the ceasefire includes a suspension of all kinetic activity and the exchange of 1,000 prisoners by each country.

“This request was made directly by me, and I very much appreciate its agreement by President Vladimir Putin and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.,” Trump said. “Hopefully, it is the beginning of the end of a very long, deadly, and hard fought War.”

Trump added that talks continue over ending the war “and we are getting closer and closer every day.”


Adviser to Iran Supreme Leader Compares Control of Hormuz to ‘Atomic Bomb’

An Iranian woman walks next to a huge anti-US billboard carrying a sentence reading in Persian “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed” at the Engelab (Revolution) square in Tehran, Iran, 08 May 2026. (EPA)
An Iranian woman walks next to a huge anti-US billboard carrying a sentence reading in Persian “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed” at the Engelab (Revolution) square in Tehran, Iran, 08 May 2026. (EPA)
TT

Adviser to Iran Supreme Leader Compares Control of Hormuz to ‘Atomic Bomb’

An Iranian woman walks next to a huge anti-US billboard carrying a sentence reading in Persian “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed” at the Engelab (Revolution) square in Tehran, Iran, 08 May 2026. (EPA)
An Iranian woman walks next to a huge anti-US billboard carrying a sentence reading in Persian “The Strait of Hormuz remains closed” at the Engelab (Revolution) square in Tehran, Iran, 08 May 2026. (EPA)

An adviser to Iran's supreme leader compared control over the Strait of Hormuz to having an "atomic bomb" on Friday, and vowed not to relinquish it.

Adviser Mohammad Mokhber said Iran had long "neglected" its privileged position along the strait, a vital conduit for oil and gas shipments that Tehran shut early in the Middle East war, throwing markets into turmoil and stranding hundreds of vessels.

"The Strait of Hormuz represents an opportunity as precious as an atomic bomb," he said in a video published by the Mehr news agency.

"Indeed, having in one's hands a position that allows you to influence the global economy with a single decision is a major opportunity."

Pledging not to "forfeit the gains of this war", he went on to say Iran would "change the (legal) regime of this strait", through international law if possible, and unilaterally if not.

Mokhber did not specifically mention charging vessels to use the waterway, but the shipping journal Lloyd's List reported on Friday that Iran had created an authority to approve transit through the strait and to collect tolls.

Iranian officials have previously mentioned implementing such a system, and a senior parliamentarian said in April that Tehran had received its first toll revenue from the strait.

The United States, whose joint attacks with Israel on the country sparked the war in the Middle East, has called tolling in the Hormuz unacceptable, as has the UN's maritime agency.

The strait has become a major bargaining chip in negotiations to end the war, with Iran currently weighing a US proposal to extend the current truce in the Gulf to allow talks on a final settlement of the conflict.


UK PM Starmer Vows to Fight on After Local Polls Drubbing

 08 May 2026, United Kingdom, London: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Labour Party members at Kingsdown Methodist Church Hall. (Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire/dpa)
08 May 2026, United Kingdom, London: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Labour Party members at Kingsdown Methodist Church Hall. (Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire/dpa)
TT

UK PM Starmer Vows to Fight on After Local Polls Drubbing

 08 May 2026, United Kingdom, London: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Labour Party members at Kingsdown Methodist Church Hall. (Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire/dpa)
08 May 2026, United Kingdom, London: British Prime Minister Keir Starmer meets Labour Party members at Kingsdown Methodist Church Hall. (Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire/dpa)

Keir Starmer vowed to carry on as UK prime minister Friday after taking responsibility for grim local election results that saw the hard right make big gains as disillusioned Britons go off mainstream parties.

"I'm not going to walk away and plunge the country into chaos," Starmer insisted, after his ruling Labour party lost hundreds of councilors in England and admitted defeat in Wales -- one of its iconic heartlands.

Labour was also braced for difficult results in the devolved parliament in Scotland, where the pro-independence Scottish National Party (SNP) said it was on course to extend its 19 years in power.

"The results are tough, they are very tough, and there's no sugarcoating it," Starmer, 63, said.

"We have lost brilliant Labour representatives across the country, these are people who put so much into their communities, so much into our party.

"And that hurts, and it should hurt, and I take responsibility," he added.

The ballot was the biggest electoral test for Starmer since Labour ousted the Conservatives following 14 years in power in a landslide election victory in 2024.

- Missteps -

He has since failed to fulfill his main promise of spurring economic growth and has been plagued by policy missteps, with impatient Britons still suffering a cost-of-living crisis now flocking to insurgent parties.

Nigel Farage's anti-immigrant Reform UK party had gained 641 seats while Labour had lost 460 across 73 of the 136 English councils to announce results by mid-afternoon Friday.

Reform had taken control of three councils -- the counties of Suffolk and Essex in eastern England and the central town of Newcastle-under-Lyme.

Farage said the local election results had demonstrated a "truly historic shift in British politics," adding that Reform "are here to stay".

Pollster John Curtice said the results illustrated a new fragmentation of British politics, with Labour being hit from its right by Reform and its left by the Greens, led by self-described eco-populist Zack Polanski.

Those backing Reform were "broadly people with a relatively socially conservative outlook" who had "lost confidence in the traditional mainstream parties" and were sympathetic to the party's views on issues such as immigration and Brexit, he said.

The ballot decided around 5,000 local council seats, out of 16,000, across England.

London finance worker Ian Tanner said he disliked Starmer's "dreadful policies" but was fearful any replacement might be "even more left wing".

Another finance worker, Dayo Foster, 60, said she believed Labour was doing "all the right things" and that Starmer just needed more time. "I don't want him to resign, no, I think we need a bit of stability".

- Leadership rumors -

In Wales, a Labour spokesperson conceded that the party would lose control of the devolved Welsh government for the first time since the parliament was established 27 years ago.

Reform or the pro-independence Plaid Cymru are expected to become the biggest party.

In Scotland, SNP leader John Swinney declared his party was on track to be the largest. As early results trickled in, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar conceded Labour hadn't won the "argument".

In London, the Greens picked up disaffected left-wingers with a pro-Gaza message.

Hailing the election of Zoe Garbett as mayor in the east London borough of Hackney, a key target area, Polanski called two-party politics "dead and buried"

Kemi Badenoch's right-wing Conservatives lost hundreds of councilors, many in traditional strongholds, although they did gain control of Westminster in central London.

A scandal over Peter Mandelson who was sacked as ambassador to Washington over his links to US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has contributed to Starmer now enduring rock-bottom approval ratings.

Britain's media has been full of rumors that ex-deputy prime minister Angela Rayner or Health Secretary Wes Streeting could try to oust Starmer after the results.

Neither is universally popular within Labour, however, and would need the backing of 20 percent of the party's MPs to launch a contest.

"Days like this don't weaken my resolve to deliver the change that I promised," said Starmer.