Lebanese Ex-FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: With Western Support, Hafez Assad Ended Aoun’s Mutiny 

Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
TT

Lebanese Ex-FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: With Western Support, Hafez Assad Ended Aoun’s Mutiny 

Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)
Michel Aoun is seen at the presidential palace in 1989. (Getty Images)

Lebanese former Foreign Minister Farez Boueiz recalled to Asharq Al-Awsat the hectic period towards the end of the 1975-90 Lebanese civil war over Elias Hrawi’s election as president and the ouster of Michel Aoun from the presidential palace and Syria’s role in both affairs.

Hrawi, like most Maronite politicians in Lebanon, dreamed of becoming president. Boueiz, Hrawi’s son-in-law, detailed to Asharq Al-Awsat the events that led up to his election.

During the civil war, Syria was entrusted by the whole world, including the United States, Vatican and Europe, to tackle the situation in Lebanon, said Boueiz. They had all acknowledged their inability to tackle the file. No one was willing to become involved militarily, so Syria was brought in to manage the situation, he explained.

Syria was still sore from the time when it was tasked in 1976 to rein in the Palestinian Liberation Organization, he went on to say. It chose Elias Sarkis to become president at the time and waged a real war in order to ensure his election.

“I believe that several Syrian soldiers were killed by Palestinian fighters during the ensuing battles,” Boueiz said.

Sarkis’ term was overshadowed by the rise of Bashir Gemayel in Lebanon and ended with Israel’s invasion of Lebanon. Gemayel was elected as his successor. Syria was also sore about this and didn’t want a repeat of that scenario, Boueiz added.

“So, it sought a Maronite president from beyond the Mount Lebanon region so that he wouldn’t be influenced by Maronites in that region,” he remarked. Damascus believed that the Maronites there were opposed to Syria.

Moreover, it sought a president who had no ties to the Lebanese Forces and would have preferred the election of a head of state who would confront it head-on if the need arose. Syria wanted a president who would not have yielded to the LF the way Sarkis did to Gemayel.

Boueiz believed that Syria had considered the election of Mikhael al-Daher, Rene Mouawad, Hrawi and Jean Obeid.

President or minister?

Ahead of the presidential elections, then minister Hrawi approached Boueiz for advice on how to handle an interview with LBC television that was then affiliated with the LF. Boueiz told him that if he harbored presidential ambitions, then he should make the message clear during the interview and add that an understanding with Syria was necessary to resolve the Lebanese crisis, which Hrawi did.

“I warned him that I would not be responsible for his security once he made such a declaration,” Boueiz recalled. “We were at war after all.” Hrawi, who had voted for Gemayel’s election as president and who had friends among the LF, believed that they would protect him from any harm.

When he finished his interview and returned home, he encountered some LF members, who told him that they wouldn’t be able to protect him. They advised him to take his family away to their house in the city of Zahle.

Hrawi had left his Zahle home eight years earlier, around the time Gemayel was elected president. Now, he was supposed to head to it without advance planning. His home had long since been occupied by local forces.

“It seemed that Syrian checkpoints had monitored his journey to Zahle. As soon as he arrived, he was greeted by [head of Syrian intelligence in Lebanon] Ghazi Kanaan. Hrawi was uncertain that he would be allowed into his house, but Kanaan delivered a presidential salute to him with a greeting: ‘Welcome, Mr. President,’” revealed Boueiz.

“Hrawi replied: ‘What president? A president who doesn’t know where he will sleep the night?’ Kanaan responded: ‘Welcome to your house. If there is even an ashtray that is out of place, I will know what to do.’” Indeed, the Hrawis entered the house and found that everything appeared untouched.

It seemed that Kanaan was made aware of Hrawi’s journey to Zahle. He sent orders to the occupiers to clean the house immediately even as the Hrawis returned late at night.

Moreover, he informed Hrawi that Syrian President Hafez al-Assad was waiting for him at the late hour. Kanaan and Hrawi headed to Syria, and he was informed by Assad that he had Damascus’ support in his bid for the presidency.

Soon after his return to Lebanon, Hrawi telephoned Boueiz to inform him, without giving away too much information over line, that his visit to Damascus was “very positive”. Hrawi’s presidency was decided at that moment, but hit a setback after the emergence of a Saudi-Syrian settlement over the election of Mouawad as president.

Mouawad enjoyed strong ties with Lebanese businessmen in Saudi Arabia, which had favored his election. The Kingdom believed that the next president must be entrusted with Lebanon’s reconstruction and garnering aid and Mouawad had the necessary connections to do that.

So, he was elected president even though Assad had favored Hrawi. Mouawad’s tenure was short-lived. He was assassinated on November 22, 1989, days after his election. Hrawi was again the frontrunner in the race.

Election

Assad favored Hrawi’s election even though some powers in Syria were opposed to his choice, but in the end, he was elected president at the Park Hotel Chtaura. He then lived in a small modest apartment in a military barracks in Ablah in the eastern Bekaa region. The presidential palace at the time was controlled by army commander Michel Aoun, who was leading a mutiny.

Boueiz recalled that Hrawi felt ineffectual and weak as president during his time at the apartment because he was disconnected from the capital, telephone lines were not operational, and it was a four-hour journey for officials to visit him. At one point, Hrawi threatened to quit, declaring: “I am not a puppet.” He grew even more defeated when he saw footage on television of throngs of Aoun supporters at the presidential palace.

Deciding to assume control of the situation, Hrawi tasked Boueiz to visit Syria to find out what will happen in Lebanon. After much resistance, Boueiz, who had never been to Syria, relented. Effectively, he became Hrawi’s unofficial advisor. He assumed the role of responding to correspondence from the Pope and the French and American presidents.

“Lebanon was without a state. Hrawi had no one to help him. The presidential guard were made up of Jamil al-Sayyed's relatives. (...) Due to the circumstances, I was forced to do everything, especially when it came to diplomacy and foreign communication,” Boueiz revealed.

Meeting Assad

Boueiz informed Hrawi that he would agree to becoming his envoy to Syria on condition that he communicate directly with Assad, not his officers or any other official. So, he was tasked in an official capacity to visit Assad. Boueiz also demanded that his visits be made public, refusing to head to Damascus in secret.

Hrawi agreed and soon after, Boueiz was invited to visit Damascus to meet with Assad.

Boueiz described the meeting as “pivotal”. He explained that the Syrian leader was expecting to meet a traditional Maronite politician, who are normally opposed to or fearful of Arabism. Boueiz surprised Assad by embracing Arabism and highlighting Christian figures who championed that way of thought. He also surprised him with his criticism of the United States, whom he described as opportunistic.

Effectively, Boueiz passed Assad’s test and their relationship was formed from that point. He later confided in him that Hrawi was on the verge of resigning if the situation with Aoun was not resolved.

“Assad informed me that it was important to avert a military operation,” Boueiz said. He then returned to Beirut for consultations with French Ambassador Rene Ala and the Vatican’s Ambassador Pablo Puente. “I met with them regularly and they would meet with Aoun for negotiations,” he added.

At the same time, Syria feared the emergence of Samir Geagea as the most powerful Christian figure after Aoun’s ouster. They feared that he would hold sway over the president the same way Gemayel did over Sarkis. So, Assad sought guarantees from Geagea over this issue. He wanted Geagea to approve of the Taif Accord, which would help end the war. Geagea had yet to declare his support because he was worried it would impact his support among Christians. Assad also wanted Geagea to recognize Hrawi’s authority as president, take a clear stance from the dismantling of militias and the deployment of the army throughout Lebanon.

Boueiz recalled his shuttle diplomacy during that time between Paris, Washington and the Vatican. He also revealed how he would move by boat under cover of darkness from Beirut’s Saint Georges Bay to Jounieh Bay and from there to visit Geagea in Keserwan to avoid Aoun’s artillery fire. His visits to Geagea would stretch long into the night.

“Geagea would dispatch a boat to transport me from the Saint Georges area. This happened over a period of six or seven months, until the West finally informed Assad that it was time to put an end to Aoun’s munity, meaning it approved of Syria’s military operation,” Boueiz said.

Aoun's ouster

Aoun rejected all proposals for him to abandon his mutiny, even from the US and France.

France, said Boueiz, was invested in the issue because of Aoun’s ties with French intelligence. French Ambassador Ala tried to defend Aoun through all possible means and was genuinely concerned over his fate.

Boueiz met with the envoy prior to the military operation. He told Asharq Al-Awsat that he criticized Ala for allowing his emotions to influence his actions. He also believed that he was not sincere in the negotiations to persuade Aoun to end his mutiny, rather, he actually encouraged him to stay at the presidential palace.

“We began to discuss how Aoun would be removed safely from the palace and moved to the French embassy, where he would have immunity,” Boueiz said. He pledged that the army would escort him to a French vessel that would sail him to France.

After much concern over his safety, Aoun managed to leave the palace swiftly and without incident and headed to embassy. “I was shocked to learn that he had arrived alone without his family,” Boueiz revealed. In the midst of the battle, “we had to find a way to bring his family to safety,” he went on to say.

Elie Hobeika, a senior LF official with connections to Syria and a debt to Aoun, who had saved his life during a past battle, agreed to transport the family from the palace to the house of the French ambassador.



Bulgarian Court Rejects Lebanon's Extradition Request for Russian Over Beirut Blast

Igor Grechushkin, a Russian businessman based in Cyprus, is escorted by police before the start of his trial on the possible extradition to Lebanon, in Sofia, Bulgaria, December 10, 2025. REUTERS
Igor Grechushkin, a Russian businessman based in Cyprus, is escorted by police before the start of his trial on the possible extradition to Lebanon, in Sofia, Bulgaria, December 10, 2025. REUTERS
TT

Bulgarian Court Rejects Lebanon's Extradition Request for Russian Over Beirut Blast

Igor Grechushkin, a Russian businessman based in Cyprus, is escorted by police before the start of his trial on the possible extradition to Lebanon, in Sofia, Bulgaria, December 10, 2025. REUTERS
Igor Grechushkin, a Russian businessman based in Cyprus, is escorted by police before the start of his trial on the possible extradition to Lebanon, in Sofia, Bulgaria, December 10, 2025. REUTERS

A Bulgarian court has rejected Lebanon's request to extradite a Russian shipowner linked to the 2020 Beirut port blast, citing insufficient security guarantees from Lebanese authorities.

Igor Grechushkin, a Cyprus-based Russian businessman whose vessel transported the explosive material that detonated at Beirut port in August 2020, killing more than 220 people, was detained in Bulgaria in September for possible extradition to Lebanon, where he is wanted over his role in the disaster, Reuters reported.

"According to the court, Lebanon did not provide sufficient evidence to ensure that the death penalty will not be imposed on him or, if imposed, will not be carried out," Ekaterina Dimitrova, Grechushkin's lawyer, told reporters after the hearing which was closed to media.

The blast, one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, devastated large parts of Beirut and left tens of thousands homeless. Grechushkin was placed on Interpol’s wanted list at Lebanon's request in 2020.

PROSECUTOR TO APPEAL RULING

Angel Kanev, the supervising prosecutor, said he would appeal the ruling, arguing that Lebanon’s justice minister, Supreme Court and Prosecutor General had all provided the required guarantees.

"Given that they have been given by such an authority ... I believe that the grounds for extradition exist," Kanev told reporters.

In response to a question about Bulgaria's objection to a possible death penalty for Grechushkin, a Lebanese judicial source said Beirut "could not change its laws on a case-by-case basis", but that it was working on a way to reassure Bulgaria and that it intended to appeal Wednesday's decision.

The source said the investigative judge presiding over the probe would still have the opportunity to question Grechushkin in person in Bulgaria.

"It's a victory for the time being because the most important thing is that he is questioned so we can find out the truth and have accountability," the source told Reuters.

Lebanon's probe into the causes of the blast and possible negligence by top Lebanese officials has dragged on for years, with families of the explosion's victims blaming political interference.

The first investigative judge was removed after charging top officials. His successor, Tarek Bitar, also charged senior politicians, who refused questioning, denied wrongdoing and froze his probe.

Bitar resumed his investigation earlier this year and has questioned several officials in recent months but he has yet to issue a long-awaited preliminary indictment.


Israeli Druze Leader Seeks US Security Guarantees for Syrian Minority

Leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafaq Tarif, speaks with Reuters at his house in Julis, northern Israel July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Sawafta
Leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafaq Tarif, speaks with Reuters at his house in Julis, northern Israel July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Sawafta
TT

Israeli Druze Leader Seeks US Security Guarantees for Syrian Minority

Leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafaq Tarif, speaks with Reuters at his house in Julis, northern Israel July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Sawafta
Leader of the Druze community in Israel, Sheikh Mowafaq Tarif, speaks with Reuters at his house in Julis, northern Israel July 28, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Sawafta

Israeli Druze leader Sheikh Mowafaq Tarif urged the United States to guarantee the security of the Druze community in Syria to prevent a recurrence of intense violence earlier this year in Sweida.

Washington needed to fulfill its "duty" to safeguard the rights of Syria's minorities in order to encourage stability, Tarif told Reuters on Tuesday during an official visit to the UN in Geneva, adding that US support would also remove the need for Israeli intervention in Syria's south.

"We hope that the United States, President Trump, and America as a great power, we want it to guarantee the rights of all minorities in Syria ... preventing any further massacres," he said.
US President Donald Trump vowed in November to do everything he can to make Syria successful after landmark talks with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa.

BLOODY CLASHES IN JULY

The Druze are a minority group whose faith is an offshoot of Islam and have followers in Israel, Syria and Lebanon.

In July, clashes between Druze and Bedouin residents broke out in Sweida after tit-for-tat kidnappings, leading to a week of bloodletting that shattered generations of fragile coexistence.

The violence worsened when government forces dispatched to restore order clashed with Druze militiamen, with widespread reports of looting, summary killings and other abuses. Israel entered the fray with encouragement from its Druze minority, attacking government forces with the stated aims of protecting Syrian Druze and keeping its borders free from militants. Tens of thousands of people from both communities were uprooted, with the unrest all but ending the Bedouins’ presence across much of Sweida.

In the aftermath, Druze leaders called for a humanitarian corridor from the Israeli-occupied Golan to Sweida and demanded self-determination, which the government rejects.

'NEED TO REBUILD TRUST'

Asked about proposals by influential Druze Sheikh Hikmat al-Hajari to separate Sweida from Syria, Tarif took a different stance, stressing the need for internal autonomy or self-governance within Syria as a way of protecting minorities and their rights and pointing to federal systems in Switzerland and Germany as examples.

It was inconceivable to ask the Druze to surrender their weapons, he said. Talks to bring Sweida's former police force onto Damascus' payroll — while allowing the Druze to retain wide local autonomy — had been making steady progress until July's bloodshed derailed them.

Al-Sharaa has vowed to protect the Druze. However, Hajari insists he poses an existential threat to his community and in September rejected a 13-point, US-brokered roadmap to resolve the conflict, according to Reuters.

Asked if talks should be revived, Tarif said trust had to be rebuilt by allowing residents to return to their homes, and permitting full humanitarian access to Sweida.

"There is no trust today ... Trust must be rebuilt," he said.

 

 


Aid Flow Into Gaza Falls Short of Ceasefire Terms, Analysis of Israeli Figures Shows

Displaced Palestinians repair their tents at a tent camp on the beach after a stormy weather in Gaza City, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
Displaced Palestinians repair their tents at a tent camp on the beach after a stormy weather in Gaza City, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
TT

Aid Flow Into Gaza Falls Short of Ceasefire Terms, Analysis of Israeli Figures Shows

Displaced Palestinians repair their tents at a tent camp on the beach after a stormy weather in Gaza City, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)
Displaced Palestinians repair their tents at a tent camp on the beach after a stormy weather in Gaza City, Wednesday, Dec. 10, 2025. (AP Photo/Jehad Alshrafi)

Aid deliveries into Gaza are falling far short of the amount called for under the US-brokered ceasefire, an Associated Press analysis of the Israeli military’s figures showed.

Under the October ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, Israel agreed to allow 600 trucks of aid into Gaza each day. But an average of around 459 trucks a day have entered Gaza between Oct. 12, when flow of the aid restarted, and Dec. 7, according to an AP analysis of latest figures by COGAT, the Israeli military body in charge of coordinating aid entry.

By all accounts, aid has fallen short in Gaza COGAT said that roughly 18,000 trucks of food aid had entered Gaza between the ceasefire taking effect and Sunday. It said that figure amounted to 70% of all aid that had entered the territory since the truce.

That means COGAT estimates that a total of just over 25,700 trucks of aid have entered Gaza — well under the 33,600 trucks that should have entered by Sunday, under the terms of the ceasefire.

In response to the AP analysis, COGAT insisted Wednesday that the number of trucks entering Gaza each day was above the 600 mark. But when asked, it refused to elaborate why the figures it gave did not reach that amount or provide raw data on truck entry.

Throughout most of the war, COGAT gave detailed figures of daily trucks entering Gaza but stopped doing so when the ceasefire began. Rights groups say that because it controls the crossings, it is the only entity with the access and visibility necessary to track how much aid and commercial goods are entering Gaza.

The UN and aid groups have often said the amount of aid entering Gaza is far lower than COGAT claims.

The UN says only 6,545 trucks have been offloaded at Gaza crossings between the ceasefire and Dec. 7, amounting to about 113 trucks a day. That's according to its online database. The UN figures do not include aid trucks sent bilaterally by organizations not working through the UN network.

A Hamas document on Saturday provided to the AP put the amount of aid trucks that have entered at 7,333.

This week, United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs stressed a “dire” need for more aid to enter Gaza, saying Israeli restrictions on aid have bottlenecked recovery efforts.

Food remains scarce in Gaza, aid groups say Humanitarian groups say lack of aid has had harsh effects on many of Gaza's 2 million residents, most of whom were forcibly displaced by war. Food remains scarce as the Palestinian territory struggles to bounce back from famine, which hit parts of Gaza during the war. Starving mothers in Gaza are giving birth to malnourished babies, some of whom have died in hospital, according to a recent report by UNICEF. As winter rains pick up, displaced families living in tents have been left exposed to the elements and without supplies to cope with floods and the biting cold.

“Needs far outpace the humanitarian community’s ability to respond, given persistent impediments,” the agency wrote in a report on Monday. “These obstacles include insecurity, customs clearance challenges, delays and denials of cargo at the crossings, and limited routes available for transporting humanitarian supplies within Gaza.”

Israel temporarily stopped all aid entry at least once in response to alleged Hamas violations of the truce. Israel said that Hamas has failed to return the bodies of the hostages in the time period established by the ceasefire, while Hamas has said it struggled to find the bodies due to the destruction left by Israel in the Palestinian territory.

Hamas has also accused Israel of violating the ceasefire terms because of the slow flow of aid, continued closure of the Rafah crossing and ongoing deadly strikes on Gaza.

Dispute over remains of final hostage Meanwhile, Israel says it is demanding the return of the final hostage, Ran Gvili.

The Office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the AP on Wednesday that Gvili’s remains must be returned, a condition of the first phase of the ceasefire.

“Once phase one is completed, phase two will begin,” the office said in a statement.

Hamas militants and Red Cross crews continued to comb the ruins of Gaza City for the final body this week, while the militant group Islamic Jihad claimed it had handed over the last hostage body in its possession.

On Tuesday, Hamas called for more international pressure on Israel to open key border crossings, cease deadly strikes on the territory and allow more aid into the strip.

The accusations mark the latest road bump at what regional leaders have described as a critical time for the ceasefire agreement, as mediators seek to push the truce into its second, more complicated phase.