Israel Publishes the Oslo Meeting Minutes

Israeli government session that approved the Oslo Accords (State Archive)
Israeli government session that approved the Oslo Accords (State Archive)
TT

Israel Publishes the Oslo Meeting Minutes

Israeli government session that approved the Oslo Accords (State Archive)
Israeli government session that approved the Oslo Accords (State Archive)

The Israeli State Archives allowed the publication of Yitzhak Rabin's government meeting minutes, at which the Oslo Accords were approved.

Haim Ramon, the Health Minister back then, stated that Ehud Barak and Benjamin Netanyahu caused the termination of the agreement and the outbreak of the Second Intifada.

Ramon said that the protocol clearly shows that Barak, then Chief of Staff of the Army, opposed the Oslo Accords from the beginning.

When he later became Minister of the Interior, Barak voted against the second part of the agreements and then announced in 1999 that there was no Palestinian partner for a peace process after the Camp David meetings.

Netanyahu declared that Israel can and will stop the Oslo process.

Later, in 1996, when he was elected prime minister, he abolished what remained of the Oslo agreement.

Ramon stressed that if Rabin had not been assassinated in 1995 and Israel had proceeded with his method, the second Intifada may not have erupted, and the Oslo agreement might have been successful.

Several other Israeli politicians who were ministers at that time echoed Ramon's assessment and agreed that Oslo was an adventure for Israel, but it also carried a historic missed opportunity.

Notably, the government session that approved these agreements was held on August 30, 1993, during a session headed by Rabin.

The 80-page transcript of that session remained "top secret" throughout this period. Publication of certain parts of the transcript remains forbidden for reasons of state security and may not take place for another 20 to 60 years.

- Fears of weapons

The declassified minutes reveal that of the 18 cabinet ministers at the time, 16 approved the Oslo Accords, and two abstained: Aryeh Deri and Shimon Sheetrit.

Deri and Sheetrit confirmed that they were negatively affected by the security doubts of Rabin, Barak, and even Shimon Peres, who feared weapons delivered to the Palestinian security apparatus and Hamas operations.

At the beginning of the session, Rabin said: "I want to start by saying this is not an easy agreement. Obviously, had we negotiated with ourselves, I'm sure the wording would have been far better. The text also includes unpleasant wording."

He stressed: "We must look much more comprehensively at all the different components."

Former Housing Minister Benjamin Ben Eliezer said that defeating Hamas is possible if the King of Jordan did, and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) will be able to do the same.

- Police for Arafat, the weapons for Hamas

Peres echoed Ben Eliezer, pointing out an "explicit commitment with the signing of the Declaration of Principles, according to which [PLO leader Yasser] Arafat will announce the cessation of terrorism."

He said, "I think so too, so give him weapons and the police. Look at the absurd situation we're in: You take the police from the PLO while leaving weapons with Hamas... Let's imagine that Asaf Yalim [head of Hamas] disappears; who will we talk to? Who are we going to negotiate with?"

Peres then asserts that the evacuation of settlements must be avoided.

"It is agreed that the settlements will remain as they are, even in the Gaza Strip (...) no settlement will be destroyed," he said.

At this moment, Army Chief of Staff Barak intervenes in the conversation: "From the first reading of the agreements in principle, I see very serious problems in the implementation of the security component, both in the Gaza and Jericho phase and in the more distant phase."

Barak continued, "In the text, the goodwill and effectiveness of the Palestinian police are merely hypotheses (...) As regards the [internal security agency] that the Palestinians will establish, the agreements envisage minimal cooperation with it."

He indicated that the agreements also foresee that "extremist elements" among the Palestinians will try to torpedo the deal.

Rabin concluded the meeting by saying: "The problems will be hard, and I must say, any form of autonomy will be more difficult than today. Because today, you have total control, while you have a partnership when there's autonomy. The test will be the partnership. I don't suggest covering this up."

He added that it was necessary to establish a partnership with the Palestinians, while it is uncertain how they will act in control.

Peres signed the Oslo Accords two weeks after this session with the current Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on September 13, 1993, in the White House garden, in the presence of Rabin and Arafat, and under the auspices of US President Bill Clinton, who pushed both of them to the famous historic handshake.



Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
TT

Iraq Preoccupied with Potential Broad Israeli Attack

Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)
Iraqi PM Mohammed Shi al-Sudani at an emergency national security council meeting. (Iraqi government)

Baghdad has been preoccupied this week with serious possibilities that Israel may expand its war on Gaza and Lebanon by striking several targets in Iraq in retaliation to attacks by Iran-backed armed factions.

Concern has been high that Israel may attack government buildings, oil fields and strategic locations, not just the positions of the armed factions that have previously launched attacks against Israel, said sources close to the pro-Iran ruling Coordination Framework.

Media sources have spoken of government speculation that Iraq could come under “300 Israeli attacks”.

The fears in Iraq have been compounded by an Israeli complaint to the United Nations Security Council against seven armed factions and holding Baghdad responsible for the attacks they have carried out against it.

This prompted the government, through the foreign ministry, to send an official letter to the Security Council, UN Secretary-General, Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation in response to the Israeli threats.

The ministry said on Saturday that Iraq is “the cornerstone of stability in the region and world and it is one of the countries that are most committed to the UN Charter.”

“The Zionist entity’s letter to the Security Council is part of a systematic policy aimed at creating claims and excuses in an attempt to expand the conflict in the region.”

It said Iraq has turned to the Security Council out of Iraq’s keenness on the international body carrying out its duty in maintaining international peace and security and the need to rein in the “Zionist aggression in Gaza and Lebanon.”

Moreover, it stressed that Iraq has been keen on exercising restraint when it comes to the use of its airspace to attack a neighboring country.

Israel has used Iraqi airspace to launch attacks against Iran in October.

Iraq underscored the importance of the international community stepping in to “stop this hostile behavior that is a flagrant violation of international law.”

It called for international efforts to stop the Israeli escalation in the region and ensure that international laws and treaties are respected to consolidate security and stability.

Meanwhile, a source close to the Coordination Framework said the main Shiite parties are taking the Israeli threats “very seriously”, urging Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani's government to take “all the necessary measures to avert a potential Israeli strike.”

All leaders of armed factions, as well as Shiite leaders, have taken up alternative locations and are moving under great secrecy, confirming that they have changed the majority of their military positions, said the source.

It also dismissed claims that Israeli jets have overflown Iraq, saying nothing has been confirmed, but not ruling out the possibility, especially since US forces have control over Iraqi skies and Iraq is helpless against stopping these violations.

Iraq had submitted a formal complaint to the UN and Security Council over Israel’s use and violation of its airspace to attack Iran.

Analyst and former diplomat Ghazi Faisal said the pro-Iran armed factions have been gathering their forces in the Sinjar province, which is strategic for Iran’s arms deliveries and logistic support to Syria where attacks can be carried out against American forces and the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.

Sinjar is one of the most important strategic bases for the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, he added.

Furthermore, he noted that the armed factions insist on continuing the war against Israel, rejecting government calls for calm and neutrality.

The government’s statements are aimed at delivering a message that it “is not directly responsible for the strategy of these factions,” which follow Iran’s policies.

Iraq has repeatedly said that it refuses for its territory to be used to attack another country, but some observers believe that it may allow Iran to do so should Israel strike.