Sadr Warns against Holding Another ‘Immoral’ Festival in Iraq

Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)
Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)
TT
20

Sadr Warns against Holding Another ‘Immoral’ Festival in Iraq

Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)
Sadr supporters are seen at a protest in Baghdad’s Sadr City in April. (AP)

For the second time in less than a month, head of the Sadrist movement in Iraq cleric Moqtada al-Sadr described the current government as that of “Bani Abbas”, recalling the historic dispute between the Abbasids and Alawites after the collapse of the Umayyad Caliphate.

Sadr made his remarks in criticism of the Iraq International Festival that was held in Baghdad earlier this week and that had sparked great controversy.

Sadr described the festival as “immoral”, warning “Islamic states against greater openness and hateful liberalism that only serve normalization [with Israel] and spread homosexuality.”

“This was demonstrated at the festival that violated Arab and Islamic societal norms that is being ruled by the Bani Abbas state,” he added.

The current government was formed through an agreement by the pro-Iran Shiite Coordination Framework, rivals of Sadr.

“I am certain that the Iraqi people are of a pure ummah and they reject corruption and perversions. I am certain that should such festivals be held again, the people will collectively reject excessive liberalism, normalization and the LGBT community,” continued Sadr.

The cleric also attacked American Ambassador to Baghdad Alina Romanowski, who had praised the festival and Iraqi artist Shatha Hassoun who had organized it.

He remarked that the festival was directly overseen by Romanowski, whom he said comes from the “nation of homosexuals.”

Sadr’s comments stirred debate in Iraq. Some political observers and activists speculated that his statement may spark street protests should such events be held again, while others discussed the limits of freedoms and going beyond them.

Some observers tied his comments to the challenges in Iraq, such as the dollar crisis and the upcoming provincial council elections.

Advisor to the prime minister for Cultural Affairs Aref al-Saadi issued a clarification over the festival. He said Hassoun had requested that a festival be held to honor Iraqi and Arab artists. Her suggestion was supported by the premiership and Ministry of Culture, but she did not receive any financial support from them because the offer was made through a private company.

The only support offered by the state authorities was preparing the square where the festival was held, he added. “The government was in no way involved in organizing the event.”

The festival went on to honor several Iraqi and Arab artists.

Saadi acknowledged that “several errors had taken place at the event”, such as the attendance of bloggers and fashionistas, whose presence he said was “inappropriate”.

Should the government have “ordered that women be inspected at the entrance of the festival? Should a dress code have been imposed?” he wondered. “Had we done so, we would have been criticized immensely and had the festival been banned, Baghdad would have been compared to Kandahar.”

The festival was initially set to be held on September 29, but the al-Hamdaniya tragedy and the ensuing days of mourning forced organizers to postpone it to October 3, which coincided with National Day.



Thomas Barrack: Syria’s Joining Abraham Accords ‘Could Take Time’

HANDOUT - 19 June 2025, Lebanon, Beirut: US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack speaks during a press conference in Beirut. Photo: Hassan Ibrahim/Lebanese Parliament/dpa
HANDOUT - 19 June 2025, Lebanon, Beirut: US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack speaks during a press conference in Beirut. Photo: Hassan Ibrahim/Lebanese Parliament/dpa
TT
20

Thomas Barrack: Syria’s Joining Abraham Accords ‘Could Take Time’

HANDOUT - 19 June 2025, Lebanon, Beirut: US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack speaks during a press conference in Beirut. Photo: Hassan Ibrahim/Lebanese Parliament/dpa
HANDOUT - 19 June 2025, Lebanon, Beirut: US Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack speaks during a press conference in Beirut. Photo: Hassan Ibrahim/Lebanese Parliament/dpa

Syria and Israel are engaged in “meaningful” talks through the United States that aim to restore calm along their border, according to Thomas Barrack, US President Donald Trump’s envoy to Syria.

Barrack said in an interview with The New York Times on Thursday that the administration wanted Syria to join the Abraham Accords, but “this could take time” because Syria’s new President Ahmed al-Sharaa could face resistance at home.

“He cannot be seen by his own people to be forced or coerced into the Abraham Accords,” Barrack said. “So he has to work slowly.”

Trump tapped Barrack, an old friend and private equity investor, to help realize his vision for the Middle East, which the administration hopes will foster less conflict and more prosperity.

Trump made clear during his Mideast visit in May that lucrative business deals in sectors including arms and artificial intelligence were his priority, and his decision to bomb nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran last month showed his support for Israel and willingness to use force against American foes.

Barrack called the US administration’s approach a departure from previous “failed” American attempts at “nation building” and from past efforts to shape how other governments rule.

Much of Barrack’s work has focused on pushing Syria and Lebanon, both recovering from destructive wars, toward solving their own problems while rallying support from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and other regional partners.

It is unclear whether Trump’s focus on prioritizing economic development over vocal support for democracy will fare better than the efforts of previous administrations to address some of the Middle East’s most bedeviling problems, according to The New York Times.

Barrack, in his first diplomatic job at age 78, has been working his relationships with heads of state and other power brokers. He said that having a direct line to the White House and to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and the fact that the administration had “little patience for the region’s resistance to helping itself,” had helped.

Much of Barrack’s effort has focused on Syria, where the fledgling government of al-Sharaa is trying to rebuild the country after a 13-year civil war.

Trump signed an executive order this week aimed at ending decades of US sanctions on Syria.

Barrack said that instead of making strict demands, the administration had laid out objectives for the Syrian government to work toward while Washington monitored its progress.

Those indications would include finding a peaceful accommodation with Israel; integrating the US-backed, Kurdish-led militia that controls Syria’s northeast; and investigating the fates of Americans who went missing during the war.

Progress on democratization and inclusive government will not happen quickly, Barrack said, and are not part of the US criteria.

American officials have expressed concerns about the thousands of fighters who came to Syria from abroad to take part in the war, mostly as part of militant groups.

Barrack said Washington realized that Syria could not expel those who remained and that they could pose a threat to the new government if they were excluded. So the Trump administration instead expects transparency about the roles they are given.

Lifting sanctions to encourage changes worked better than keeping them in place until Syria met specific demands, Barrack said.

“It is a brilliant way to accomplish the same thing, and these roll-on, roll-off sanctions have never worked anyway,” he said.

The new Syrian government’s relations have been tense with Israel, whose military has moved into southern Syria and often carried out operations there. The talks aim to quiet the conflict along the border while laying the groundwork for better relations.