Lebanese FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: Israel Mustn't Expand the War 

Lebanese caretaker Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat from Washington. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Lebanese caretaker Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat from Washington. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Lebanese FM to Asharq Al-Awsat: Israel Mustn't Expand the War 

Lebanese caretaker Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat from Washington. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Lebanese caretaker Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib speaks to Asharq Al-Awsat from Washington. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Lebanese caretaker Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib stressed that Israel must not expand the war it is waging with the Palestinian Hamas movement in Gaza and its surrounding areas.

In an interview to Asharq Al-Awsat from Washington, he described the “explosion” in Gaza as “dangerous”, blaming the situation on Israel’s “arrogance” and “constant violations” against the Palestinian people.

Israel rejects the two-state solution that was adopted during the 2002 Arab summit in Beirut, he went on to say. Its current government has shown disdain towards the Palestinians and has violated Christian and Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem.

“So, the result that we see unfolding now was unavoidable,” he remarked, noting still that “no one expected this to happen from Gaza. Observers were worried about an explosion, and it happened.”

Bou Habib spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat before Hezbollah announced on Sunday that it had struck Israeli positions in the occupied Shebaa Farms.

He revealed that the Lebanese government had received a pledge from the Iran-backed party that it would not involve itself in the war in Gaza, unless Israel “harassed” Lebanon.

“Israel is now defending itself and it must not expand the war. If it does, only God knows what will happen,” said the FM.

Furthermore, Bou Habib added that Lebanon may be going through an unprecedented crisis and its state institutions are weak, “but security is under control, the army is present, and it has a foreign and internal policy.”

“The government is carrying on with its duties. Of course, we have problems, but the stances of the government represent the whole of Lebanon,” he stressed.

‘Bold’ Arab position

Arab countries, such as Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and others, have called for an immediate ceasefire and return to peace negotiations that would grant the Palestinians their right.

Bou Habib said that Lebanon supports this demand, and it will benefit from any peace that is established in the region.

“We support this bold Arab position,” he declared. “We call on the United Nations to take a bold decision related to the resumption of the peace process and implementation of the two-state solution.”

Asked if the unrest in Gaza will impact the demarcation of the Lebanese-Israeli maritime borders, the minister replied that efforts will be delayed, but reaching a ceasefire is priority at the moment.

“We don’t believe that the Blue Line in the south is Lebanon’s actual border. We are therefore insisting on the border stipulated in the truce. We will continue to voice our demands to establish peace in the South,” he continued.

“In the end, Israel will have the final say. The Americans claim that they can’t force Israel to do anything without first receiving a response from it. Everything is now on hold until the fighting stops in Gaza,” he noted.

Addressing claims that the Lebanese state has been usurped by Hezbollah and so decisions related to the border are taken by the party, Bou Habib replied: “The agreement over the border was reached by this government and when we had an elected president.”

Asked when Lebanon will elect a president after nearly a year of vacancy in the country’s top post, he said: “It will happen sooner or later.”

More Syrian refugees

The situation in Lebanon is not only fragile because of its border dispute with Israel, but because of the war in Syria. It has witnessed a renewed flow of refugees from Syria in the tens and hundreds of thousands.

Bou Habib blamed the new wave on the “very bad” economic crisis on Syria that was caused by western sanctions. Every unemployed person wants to immigrate, he noted.

“The Lebanese know this more than anyone. We have millions of Lebanese who left their country because of the economy, more so than political or security reasons,” Bou Habib stated.

“We understand why the Syrians have turned to Lebanon, but we can no longer support them. We have taken in two million Syrians, or nearly half of the Lebanese population. We also have half a million Palestinians,” he added.

“Lebanon can no longer tolerate the situation,” the FM declared.

“The international community must understand this. As long as the UN continues to pay the UN High Commissioner for Refugees to support the refugees in Lebanon, they will remain here and not go back to their homeland. The UN agency and western countries view the Syrians as political refugees, when they are actually not,” he added.

“I am not saying that the UNHCR is a danger to Lebanon, but its policies are only leading to more Syrians coming to Lebanon. It is not fully cooperating with the Lebanese state or Syrian authorities to determine who is an economic refugee and who is a political one,” he revealed.

“If it does, then it won’t have that much work to do,” he continued, describing the agency as an “empire”.

“They need to understand the situation in Lebanon,” he demanded, saying the government and interior and foreign ministers always warn the UN that the current situation with the refugees must not persist, but western countries are still insisting on their position.

Turning to Hezbollah and Lebanon’s relations with Arab countries, Bou Habib said the ties were “good”. Contact are always ongoing with Arab countries, he added.

“Some Arab countries have a problem with Hezbollah’s presence in Lebanon. We view the party as a regional issue, not one that can be resolved by the Lebanese government,” he remarked. “I hope there is further understanding over this point.”



UN Court Opinion Due on Occupied Palestinian Land

People in front of the Peace Palace ahead of a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on a request from South Africa for emergency measures for Gaza, in The Hague, Netherlands, 26 January 2024. (EPA)
People in front of the Peace Palace ahead of a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on a request from South Africa for emergency measures for Gaza, in The Hague, Netherlands, 26 January 2024. (EPA)
TT

UN Court Opinion Due on Occupied Palestinian Land

People in front of the Peace Palace ahead of a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on a request from South Africa for emergency measures for Gaza, in The Hague, Netherlands, 26 January 2024. (EPA)
People in front of the Peace Palace ahead of a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on a request from South Africa for emergency measures for Gaza, in The Hague, Netherlands, 26 January 2024. (EPA)

The UN's top court will on Friday hand down its view on the legal consequences of Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories since 1967, amid growing international pressure over the war in Gaza.
Any opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) would be non-binding, but it comes amid mounting concern over Israel's war against Hamas sparked by the group's brutal October 7 attacks.
A separate high-profile case brought before the court by South Africa alleges that Israel has committed genocidal acts during its Gaza offensive.
Judges will read their findings at 1300 GMT at the opulent Peace Palace in The Hague, the home of the ICJ.
The UN's General Assembly asked the ICJ in late 2022 to give an "advisory opinion" on the "legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem".
The ICJ held a week-long session in February to hear submissions from countries following the request -- supported by most countries within the Assembly.
Most speakers too during the hearings called on Israel to end its 57-year occupation. They warned a prolonged occupation posed an "extreme danger" to stability in the Middle East and beyond.
But the United States said Israel should not be legally obliged to withdraw without taking its "very real security needs" into account.
Israel did not take part in the oral hearings.
Instead, it submitted a written contribution in which it described the questions the court had been asked as "prejudicial" and "tendentious".
'Ongoing violation'
The General Assembly has asked the ICJ to consider two questions.
Firstly, the court should examine the legal consequences of what the UN called "the ongoing violation by Israel of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination".
This relates to the "prolonged occupation, settlement and annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967" and "measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem".
In June 1967, Israel crushed some of its Arab neighbors in a six-day war, seizing the West Bank including east Jerusalem from Jordan, the Golan Heights from Syria, and the Gaza Strip and Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.
Israel then began to settle the 70,000 square kilometers (27,000 square miles) of seized Arab territory.
The UN later declared the occupation of Palestinian territory illegal, and Cairo regained Sinai under its 1979 peace deal with Israel.
The ICJ has also been asked to look into the consequences of what it described as Israel's "adoption of related discriminatory legislation and measures".
Secondly, the ICJ should advise on how Israel's actions "affect the legal status of the occupation" and what are the consequences for the UN and other countries.
The ICJ rules in disputes between states. Normally, its judgements are binding although it has little means to enforce them.
In this case however, the opinion it issues will be non-binding, although most advisory opinions are in fact acted upon.