Retired Sudanese Major General: Muslim Brotherhood Fired First Shot in War, then Hid Behind Army

Sudanese retired Major General Kamal Ismail. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Sudanese retired Major General Kamal Ismail. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT

Retired Sudanese Major General: Muslim Brotherhood Fired First Shot in War, then Hid Behind Army

Sudanese retired Major General Kamal Ismail. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Sudanese retired Major General Kamal Ismail. (Asharq Al-Awsat)

Sudanese retired Major General Kamal Ismail accused the Muslim Brotherhood of sparking the war in his country in April 2023.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, he added that the Brotherhood, which is also known as the Islamic Movement, then “hid behind the army” under the pretext of supporting it.

He remarked that the Brotherhood has an interest in launching a war, warning however, that it could ultimately lead to a civil conflict in Sudan.

The best solution lies in ending the war through negotiations, Ismail added from Addis Ababa.

“The Brotherhood does not want to end the war or hold negotiations,” he went on to say.

Ismail retired in the 1990s along with hundreds of other officers, whose service was terminated “for the general good” when the Islamists, under Omar al-Bashir, seized power.

He had taken part in several operations led by the armed Sudanese opposition against Muslim Brotherhood rule in the country.

Ismail was one of the mediators who took part in talks between the army and Rapid Support Forces (RSF) after the war erupted last year.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that before the conflict broke out, the Muslim Brotherhood had carried out campaigns to incite the army and RSF to war.

He explained that the Brotherhood wanted to seek revenge against the revolution and restore its rule in the country.

Heavy losses

He expressed his surprise at the losses incurred by the army, blaming them on poor leadership and planning.

The weakening of the army, he said, dates back to 1990. Islamist leader Hassan al-Turabi dismissed the army at the time as a mercenary group. He then declared the formation of a “jihadist” army, marking the beginning of the weakening of the military.

Soon after, over 500 officers were forced into retirement and forces parallel to the army were formed, such as the Popular Defense Forces and other militias, Ismail said.

The army’s combat ability was weakened as a result, and this was evident as soon as the war with the RSF erupted.

He explained that the military had formed the RSF and trained its members. Some 300 officers joined the RSF, making it a formidable force. In turn, the army was neglected and failed to train on urban warfare, which is what is taking place in the country.

“Such warfare is unacceptable because it ends up using civilians as human shields. The army is not trained for this,” Ismail added.

“Urban warfare needs preparations, information and infantry. The army clearly doesn’t have enough infantry units, while the RSF was originally formed of these forces,” he continued.

The army is better equipped than the RSF, as shown by its air power, artillery and armored vehicles. However, these factors aren’t enough to win the war. It needs infantry, he stressed.

Moreover, the army had declared at the beginning of the conflict that it would be able to secure victory within hours. The hours turned into weeks and the weeks turned into months, with the RSF making more advances on the ground, noted Ismail.

This is evidently a sign of wrong information obtained by the army during the early days of the war, he explained.

Ultimately, no one will emerge from this war victorious, regardless of the situation on the ground. “The Sudanese people are biggest losers. They are suffering from the war and we're working on ending it,” he stated.

He warned that if any party in the war refuses to end it, “then it could stretch on for dozens of years.” If this happens, Sudan could end up like Libya, with multiple administrations.

The “only solution” lies in negotiations, he stressed. “The sound of reason must prevail now.”

Lack of planning

Ismail blamed the large number of casualties in army officers on a lack of planning for war and poor training.

He said that “they lacked offensive and defensive plans. Yes, the war was predicted, but the planning for it was not enough. This was clear to us.”

“This is why we turned to our brothers [in the RSF] so that they could agree to negotiations and so we can build a unified professional army,” he added.

Furthermore, Ismail said the military’s moral, financial and human losses in the past nine months have taken a toll on it.

The people are tired of war and want it to end at any cost, he stated.

He warned that the prolongation of the conflict would lead to civil war. He noted that Sudan is diverse in its tribes, but also suffers from discrimination.

“We must recognize our diversity and tackle our social, political and military differences. This can only happen through negotiations,” Ismail urged.



Israel Begins Demolitions Inside UNRWA Headquarters in East Jerusalem

A photograph shows a demolished structure inside the headquarters of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem on January 20, 2026. (AFP)
A photograph shows a demolished structure inside the headquarters of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem on January 20, 2026. (AFP)
TT

Israel Begins Demolitions Inside UNRWA Headquarters in East Jerusalem

A photograph shows a demolished structure inside the headquarters of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem on January 20, 2026. (AFP)
A photograph shows a demolished structure inside the headquarters of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood of Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem on January 20, 2026. (AFP)

Israeli bulldozers began demolishing structures inside the headquarters of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) in east Jerusalem on Tuesday, an AFP photographer saw, with the Israeli foreign ministry defending the move.

"UNRWA-Hamas had already ceased its operations at this site and no longer had any UN personnel or UN activity there. The compound does not enjoy any immunity and the seizure of this compound by Israeli authorities was carried out in accordance with both Israeli and international law," the foreign ministry said in a statement.

Israel has repeatedly accused UNRWA of providing cover for Hamas, claiming that some of its employees took part in the group's October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, which sparked the war in Gaza.


Hamas Leaders Prepare for 'Safe Exit' from Gaza, Amid Doubts Over Return

A Palestinian child is seen as fighters from Hamas’ Qassam Brigades search for the bodies of Israeli hostages in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, last December. (EPA)
A Palestinian child is seen as fighters from Hamas’ Qassam Brigades search for the bodies of Israeli hostages in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, last December. (EPA)
TT

Hamas Leaders Prepare for 'Safe Exit' from Gaza, Amid Doubts Over Return

A Palestinian child is seen as fighters from Hamas’ Qassam Brigades search for the bodies of Israeli hostages in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, last December. (EPA)
A Palestinian child is seen as fighters from Hamas’ Qassam Brigades search for the bodies of Israeli hostages in the Jabalia refugee camp in northern Gaza, last December. (EPA)

Sources within Hamas in Gaza revealed that senior figures in the movement are preparing for a “safe exit” from the enclave following arrangements related to Gaza’s future under the second phase of the ceasefire agreement, which the United States announced had begun last week.

Three Hamas sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that several prominent political and military leaders who survived the war are preparing to leave the territory. One source said the departure would be voluntary and carried out under specific arrangements, with full coordination with the Hamas leadership abroad. Another source noted that other leaders, particularly military figures, categorically reject leaving Gaza under any circumstances.

Throughout nearly two years of war, Hamas officials have repeatedly stated their rejection of removing the movement’s leadership from the Strip.

The sources separately provided Asharq Al-Awsat with the names of several leaders believed likely to depart, though it is refraining from publishing them due to the inability to contact them promptly. Some of these figures were recently appointed to leadership positions in Hamas’ political bureau in Gaza as part of new organizational arrangements aimed at rebuilding and restructuring the movement.

According to the same sources, a number of former prisoners released in the 2011 exchange deal for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit — who now oversee key portfolios within Hamas leadership — are expected to be among those traveling to Türkiye.

However, a senior Hamas leader based outside Gaza denied the reports, telling Asharq Al-Awsat that the issue of leaders leaving the Strip “has not been raised.”

Another source inside Gaza declined to comment, saying only that he had no knowledge of the matter.

Sources in Gaza said the exit would likely be “without return, at least for several years,” with those leaders likely to end up residing in several countries. Other sources said some leaders would leave temporarily to hold meetings in Egypt with security officials on critical issues related to Gaza’s governmental security forces and other key files, before returning to the Strip.

In September, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in an interview with Fox News that Israel was considering providing safe passage for Hamas leaders to leave Gaza under certain conditions, as part of a plan being prepared by US President Donald Trump, which entered into force in October.

Israel’s public broadcaster reported that Hamas leaders would most likely head to Qatar or Türkiye if they left Gaza. Israel’s Channel 12 previously reported that Hamas officials told US officials they were prepared to accept a limited relocation of military leaders and some operatives from Gaza.

On Jan. 14, US envoy Steve Witkoff officially announced the launch of the second phase of the ceasefire, which includes Hamas relinquishing control of Gaza, establishing a Palestinian technocratic committee to administer the enclave, initiating a comprehensive disarmament process, and launching large-scale reconstruction projects.

Hamas welcomed the announcement, saying it had fulfilled all requirements for completing the first phase and moving to the second, while continuing discussions with mediators over options regarding its weapons and those of other Palestinian factions.


China Confirms Invited to Join Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’

 Displaced Palestinians shelter in a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, January 19, 2026. (Reuters)
Displaced Palestinians shelter in a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, January 19, 2026. (Reuters)
TT

China Confirms Invited to Join Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’

 Displaced Palestinians shelter in a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, January 19, 2026. (Reuters)
Displaced Palestinians shelter in a tent camp in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, January 19, 2026. (Reuters)

Beijing confirmed on Tuesday that China had been invited to join US President Donald Trump's "Board of Peace".

"China has received the United States' invitation," foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun told a regular news briefing, without specifying whether Beijing would accept the invitation.

The board was originally conceived to oversee the rebuilding of war-torn Gaza, but the charter does not appear to limit its role to the occupied Palestinian territory.

Washington has asked various leaders to sit on the board, chaired by Trump, including Russian President Vladimir Putin, Hungarian premier Viktor Orban and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

Guo said China-US relations had achieved overall stability in the past year, despite a trade war that saw both countries impose tit-for-tat tariffs on each others' products.

"Over the past year, China-US relations have experienced ups and downs, but have maintained overall dynamic stability," Guo told reporters.

"Cooperation between China and the US benefits both sides, while confrontation harms both," he added.