Baath Party Legacy Looms over Iraqi Parliament Speaker Election

The Iraqi Parliament has been operating without a speaker since last October following the dismissal of Mohammed Al-Halbousi (Parliament's media)
The Iraqi Parliament has been operating without a speaker since last October following the dismissal of Mohammed Al-Halbousi (Parliament's media)
TT
20

Baath Party Legacy Looms over Iraqi Parliament Speaker Election

The Iraqi Parliament has been operating without a speaker since last October following the dismissal of Mohammed Al-Halbousi (Parliament's media)
The Iraqi Parliament has been operating without a speaker since last October following the dismissal of Mohammed Al-Halbousi (Parliament's media)

Late on Friday night, shortly before the session to elect a new parliament speaker in Iraq, political discourse shifted towards candidates' associations with the former leader, Saddam Hussein.

Iraqis on social media shared an old video featuring Mahmoud Mashhadani, a contender from the Azem Alliance. In the video, Mashhadani praises Saddam, saying, “There is no leader for Iraq’s Sunnis after Saddam Hussein.”

Bloggers also circulated a video of Shalan Al-Karim, a candidate from the Takadum Party, from 2013 during the Anbar province protests, where he expresses sympathy for Saddam.

Using such videos to discredit opponents during elections is a political norm, but it has intensified among Iraqi Sunni factions.

The Iraqi Constitution banned the Baath Party in 2005, and in 2016, the Parliament passed a law penalizing affiliation with and promotion of the party.

Mashhadani (Azem Alliance), Al-Karim (Takadum Party), and Salem Al-Issawi (Al-Siyada Alliance) are prominent contenders for parliament speaker, succeeding the ousted Mohammed al-Halbousi.

Since November, Iraq’s Parliament has been without a speaker after al-Halbousi was dismissed on forgery charges.

These indicators in local public opinion suggest a rise in Al-Issawi’s chances, backed by businessman Khamees Al-Khanjar, who is younger than Mashhadani (aged 76) and Al-Karim, 56.

Al-Issawi is an up-and-coming politician who has kept a distance from the intense rivalry between Sunni and Shiite factions in Iraq.

However, the Al-Siyada Alliance, which Al-Issawi is a part of and is led by Al-Khanjar, has faced backlash due to the characterization of ISIS militants as “revolutionaries” in 2014.

Observers believe that Al-Khanjar has managed to navigate these challenges, forming political alliances with both Sunni and Shiite groups, securing significant seats in recent elections.

However, the question of whether he will win over the post of parliament speaker remains uncertain.

Twisting Facts

Responding to what he termed “public opinion campaigns,” Al-Karim issued a statement, addressing the re-circulation and manipulation of a video accusing him of promoting the banned Baath Party.

The candidate for the speaker ‘sposition condemned the reposting of the video as “an unscrupulous and disrespectful act.”

“This video resurfaced in 2014 during the legislative elections, used as evidence in a complaint against me, leading to my disqualification by the Accountability and Justice Commission,” reminded Al-Karim.

“Back then, I filed an appeal against the decision, and the Judicial Appeals Board acknowledged that the video was edited to tarnish my image,” he added.

He believes that the recent reposting of the video aims to obstruct his parliamentary duties. Al-Karim cautioned against entities trying to revive tensions and societal divisions.

On the other hand, the second candidate, Mashhadani, refrained from commenting on the controversy surrounding his past remarks about the Baath Party and the former regime’s leader.

Ahead of the speaker election session scheduled for Sunday, Iraqi Sunni parties haven't agreed on a candidate. Meanwhile, Shiite coordination forces are leveraging this division to elect a candidate aligned with their interests.



Palestinian Envoy Tells UN Court that Israel is Killing Civilians and Targeting Aid Workers in Gaza

A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
TT
20

Palestinian Envoy Tells UN Court that Israel is Killing Civilians and Targeting Aid Workers in Gaza

A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)
A Palestinian flag flies outside the International Court of Justice, rear, which opened hearings into a United Nations request for an advisory opinion on Israel's obligations to allow humanitarian assistance in Gaza and the West Bank, in The Hague, Netherlands, Monday, April 28, 2025. (AP Photo/Peter Dejong)

A Palestinian diplomat has told the United Nations’ top court that Israel is killing and displacing civilians and targeting aid workers in Gaza in a “man-made catastrophe of unprecedented proportions.”

Ambassador Ammar Hijazi was speaking Monday at the opening of a week of hearings at the International Court of Justice into Israel’s legal obligations to facilitate aid in the occupied territories, The Associated Press said.

Israel denies deliberately targeting civilians and aid staff.

The United Nations’ highest court opened hearings Monday into Israel’s obligation to “ensure and facilitate” urgently needed humanitarian assistance to Palestinian civilians in the occupied territories, bringing the ongoing conflict in Gaza back into focus in The Hague.

Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called the hearings part of a “systematic persecution and delegitimization” of his country. Speaking in Jerusalem as the hearings began in The Hague, Saar said the court was “becoming completely politicized.” He called the proceeding “shameful.”

A week of hearings has been scheduled in response to a request last year from the UN General Assembly, which asked the International Court of Justice to weigh in on Israel’s legal responsibilities after the country blocked the UN agency for Palestinian refugees from operating on its territory.

In a resolution sponsored by Norway, the General Assembly requested an advisory opinion, a non-binding but legally important decision from the court, on Israel's obligations in the occupied territories to "ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently needed supplies essential to the survival of the Palestinian civilian population?”

Hearings open as the humanitarian aid system in Gaza is nearing collapse. Israel has blocked the entry of food, fuel, medicine and other humanitarian supplies since March 2. It renewed its bombardment on March 18, breaking a ceasefire, and seized large parts of the territory, saying it aims to push Hamas to release more hostages. Despite the stepped-up Israeli pressure, ceasefire efforts remain deadlocked.

The World Food Program said last week its food stocks in the Gaza Strip have run out under Israel’s nearly 8-week-old blockade, ending a main source of sustenance for hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in the territory. Many families are struggling to feed their children.

The United Nations was the first to address the court on Monday, followed by Palestinian representatives. In total, 40 states and four international organizations are scheduled to participate. Israel is not scheduled to speak during the hearings, but could submit a written statement. Israel's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The United States, which voted against the UN resolution, is scheduled to speak on Wednesday.

The court will likely take months to rule. But experts say the decision, though not legally binding, could profoundly impact international jurisprudence, international aid to Israel and public opinion.

“Advisory opinions provide clarity,” Juliette McIntyre, an expert on international law at the University of South Australia, told The Associated Press. Governments rely on them in international negotiations and the outcome could be used to pressure Israel into easing restrictions on aid.

Whether any ruling will have an effect on Israel, however, is unclear. Israel has long accused the United Nations of being unfairly biased against it and has ignored a 2004 advisory ruling by the ICJ that found its West Bank separation barrier illegal.

On Tuesday, South Africa, a staunch critic of Israel, will present its arguments. In hearings last year in a separate case at the court, the country accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza — a charge Israel denies. Those proceedings are still underway.

Israel's troubled relations with UNRWA

Israel’s ban on the agency, known as UNRWA, came into effect in January. The organization has faced increased criticism from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right allies, who claim the group is deeply infiltrated by Hamas. UNRWA rejects that claim.

Israel alleged that 19 out of UNRWA’s approximately 13,000 staff in Gaza took part in Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack in southern Israel, which killed about 1,200 people and set off the war in Gaza. UNRWA said it fired nine staffers after an internal UN investigation concluded that they could have been involved, although the evidence was not authenticated and corroborated. Israel later alleged that about 100 other Palestinians in Gaza were Hamas members, but never provided any evidence to the United Nations. Israel has also accused Hamas of using UN facilities for cover, building tunnels near UN buildings and diverting aid deliveries for its own use.

The Israeli ban doesn't apply directly to Gaza. But it controls all entry to the territory, and its ban on UNRWA from operating inside Israel greatly limits the agency's ability to function. Israeli officials say they are looking for alternative ways to deliver aid to Gaza that would cut out the United Nations.

UNRWA was established by the UN General Assembly in 1949 to provide relief for Palestinians who fled or were expelled from their homes in what is now Israel during the war surrounding Israel's creation the previous year until there is a political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The agency has been providing aid and services — including health and education — to some 2.5 million Palestinians in Gaza, the occupied West Bank and east Jerusalem, as well as 3 million more in Syria, Jordan and Lebanon.

Israel’s air and ground war has killed over 51,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not say how many of the dead were civilians or combatants. Israel says it has killed around 20,000 militants, without providing evidence.