Int'l Organizations Condemn France's ‘Silence’ Over Nuclear Waste Sites in Algeria

The statement condemned the harmful effects of the tests that were conducted in Algeria from 1960 to 1966. (Algerian Archive Foundation)
The statement condemned the harmful effects of the tests that were conducted in Algeria from 1960 to 1966. (Algerian Archive Foundation)
TT
20

Int'l Organizations Condemn France's ‘Silence’ Over Nuclear Waste Sites in Algeria

The statement condemned the harmful effects of the tests that were conducted in Algeria from 1960 to 1966. (Algerian Archive Foundation)
The statement condemned the harmful effects of the tests that were conducted in Algeria from 1960 to 1966. (Algerian Archive Foundation)

On the occasion of the 64th anniversary of the first French nuclear test in Algeria, 15 international non-governmental organizations condemned the silence of the French authorities regarding waste dumping sites in the Algerian desert.

Last June, the Algerian authorities asked Russia's aid to help clean up nuclear sites contaminated with nuclear radiation after despairing of Paris's cooperation.

The organizations issued a joint list, published Tuesday on the website of Algerian human rights organization Shoaa, demanding that the French government lift the secrecy surrounding the files related to the tests.

They asked the authorities to disclose accurate maps revealing nuclear waste locations and precisely identifying the burial sites of this waste.

The statement said that despite more than 64 years having passed since these tests, France continues to deal with these issues with great secrecy under the pretext of national defense and security.

They identified themselves as organizations that defend communities affected by the tests and represent advocates for the prohibition of nuclear weapons, calling for the protection of the environment and human rights and the promotion of peace.

The statement condemned the harmful effects of the tests that were conducted in Algeria from 1960 to 1966.

The organizations called for urgent action to address the ongoing disaster resulting from them and facilitate and expedite the process of compensating Algerian victims.

The organizations include: the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, Peru for Disarmament, and Nuclear Disarmament Initiatives (France).

The activists urged France to ratify the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons to demonstrate its good faith in addressing the disaster resulting from its nuclear tests in Algeria.

They also urged the Algerian government to use all available legal and diplomatic means to assist the victims of nuclear testing in regaining their moral and material rights.

They also asked for regular reports on the activities of the National Agency for the Rehabilitation of French Nuclear Test Sites and Explosions in Southern Algeria, which was established in 2021.

On February 13, 1960, French colonial authorities detonated a plutonium bomb in the desert town of Reggane. Its power reached 70 kilotons, which is equivalent to 3 to 4 times the power of the Hiroshima bomb (1945), according to expert estimates.

Documents declassified in 2013 revealed that the radioactive effects of the bombing reached West Africa and southern Europe.

At total of 57 detonations were carried out between 1960 and 1966, according to historical documents and testimonies, which also indicated that France experimented with them on 150 Algerian prisoners.

However, to date, no accurate data is available on the extent of the damage to humans and the environment in those areas.

In 2020, President Emmanuel Macron received a landmark report from historian Benjamin Stora recommending continued joint work that looks into "the locations of nuclear tests in Algeria and their consequences."

The request includes financial compensation for the losses caused to humans and the land by the radiation emanating from these experiments.

France also faces similar issues in other regions under its administration, including Polynesia in the Pacific Ocean. It conducted nuclear tests there in 1996.



UN Humanitarian Chief Slams Aid Plan for Gaza Proposed by Israel, Backed by US 

A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)
A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)
TT
20

UN Humanitarian Chief Slams Aid Plan for Gaza Proposed by Israel, Backed by US 

A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)
A Palestinian boy has a bite from a ration of hot food from a charity kitchen set up at the Islamic University campus in Gaza City on May 12, 2025.(AFP)

United Nations aid chief Tom Fletcher on Tuesday criticized an Israel-initiated and US-backed humanitarian aid distribution plan for Gaza as a "fig leaf for further violence and displacement" of Palestinians in the war-torn enclave.

"It is cynical sideshow. A deliberate distraction," Fletcher told the UN Security Council.

No humanitarian aid has been delivered to Gaza since March 2, and a global hunger monitor has warned that half a million people face starvation, a quarter of the enclave's population.

Israel proposed last week that private companies would take over handing out aid in Gaza's south once an expanded Israeli offensive starts in its war there, which began in October 2023 after Hamas attacked Israel. Aid deliveries have been handled by international aid groups and UN organizations.

"We can save hundreds of thousands of survivors. We have rigorous mechanisms to ensure our aid gets to civilians and not to Hamas, but Israel denies us access, placing the objective of depopulating Gaza before the lives of civilians," said Fletcher.

Israel has accused Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies, and is blocking deliveries until Hamas releases all remaining hostages.

Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar, currently on an official visit to Japan, said on Wednesday that Israel endorsed what he called "the American humanitarian plan" under which aid would be provided by a private fund.

"It will go directly to the people. Hamas must not be allowed to get their hands on it," Saar said.

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has rejected Israel's proposal, saying in April it risked "further controlling and callously limiting aid down to the last calorie and grain of flour."

The UN says any aid distribution must be independent, impartial and neutral, in line with humanitarian principles.

Fletcher said the UN has met more than a dozen times with Israeli authorities about their proposed aid distribution model to find a solution but without success. Minimum conditions include the ability to deliver aid to all those in need wherever they are in Gaza, he said.

Amid the stalemate, the United States last week backed a mechanism for Gaza aid deliveries to be handled by private companies, an approach that appeared to resemble Israel's proposal, but gave few initial details about the plan.

"We will not allow the old, broken system to remain in place," Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon told the council. "We appreciate the efforts to build a new mechanism, one grounded in accountability."

US WORKING WITH ISRAEL

Senior US officials were working with Israel to enable a newly established Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to "provide a secure mechanism capable of delivering aid directly to those in need, without Hamas stealing, looting or leveraging this assistance for its own ends", acting US Ambassador to the UN Dorothy Shea told the Security Council on Tuesday.

She urged the UN and aid groups to cooperate, saying the foundation would deliver aid consistent with humanitarian principles and would "ensure its own security so that commodities reach civilians in need".

"While some humanitarian organizations may ultimately choose not to engage in these conversations, others have chosen a more constructive path, and they will be able to deliver aid in an appropriate way, hopefully very soon," Shea said.

Fletcher said the Israeli-designed distribution model was not the answer. This was in part because Israel said it would limit aid distribution to south Gaza during its planned offensive and people would have to relocate to access aid there.

"It forces further displacement. It exposes thousands of people to harm," Fletcher told the council. "It restricts aid to only one part of Gaza while leaving other dire needs unmet. It makes aid conditional on political and military aims. It makes starvation a bargaining chip."

Most of the 15-member Security Council expressed concern about the proposed aid distribution plans.

"We cannot support any model that places political or military objectives above the needs of civilians. Or that undermines the UN and other partners' ability to operate independently," Britain, France, Slovenia, Greece and Denmark said in a joint statement before the council meeting.

The war in Gaza was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas killed 1,200 people in southern Israel, and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, more than 52,700 Palestinians have been killed, according to Gaza health authorities.