Undeclared Truce in Iraq Allows Sudani to Mend Ties with Washington

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani speaks during an interview with Reuters in Baghdad, Iraq January 9, 2024. (Reuters)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani speaks during an interview with Reuters in Baghdad, Iraq January 9, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Undeclared Truce in Iraq Allows Sudani to Mend Ties with Washington

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani speaks during an interview with Reuters in Baghdad, Iraq January 9, 2024. (Reuters)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani speaks during an interview with Reuters in Baghdad, Iraq January 9, 2024. (Reuters)

For the second consecutive week, Iraqi armed factions did not carry out attacks against American troops deployed at the country’s western Ain al-Asad base and Harir base near Erbil in the Kurdistan Region.

Circles close to the factions claimed that the calm prevailed in wake of a visit by Iranian Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani to Baghdad last week.

Other informed sources stressed, however, that Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani should be credited for the calm after he held a series of meetings with the top Shiite leaders in the pro-Iran Coordination Framework.

The sources close to the factions and Tehran continued to assert that the agreement to restore calm was reached after the Kataib Hezbollah, one of the most prominent pro-Iran factions, decided to suspend its operations against American interests in Iraq and Syria.

Other political sources refuted the claim, saying that had the calm been arranged by Qaani, it would have involved the Nujaba and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada factions, which had both openly rejected the truce declared by Kataib Hezbollah.

They vowed to continue their operations, saying the Kataib Hezbollah should join them.

The sources said Qaani made a surprise visit to Baghdad where he informed the factions of the need to de-escalate the situation to avert more retaliatory American strikes that could “target their leaders or main infrastructure or even seek direct revenge against Iran.”

The calm continues to hold in spite of the objection expressed by some parties.

Meanwhile, an Iraqi political source told Asharq Al-Awsat that the truce was arranged by PM Sudani, who is also commander of the armed forces.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said the PM took firm stances towards achieving this calm, especially since the attacks started to pose a threat to Iraq’s security and stability.

He informed all parties the need to restore calm so that communication could continue between him and American officials within the joint military commission.

The commission had kicked off meetings two weeks ago and is aimed at reaching an understanding over how to arrange relations between Baghdad and the international coalition fighting ISIS, as well as discuss the future of the American troop deployment in Iraq.

The source revealed that contacts were made with the Iranians – through main Shiite leaders who enjoy ties with them – to allow the government the opportunity to reach an understanding with the coalition and over the American deployment. These agreements cannot be reached without lengthy negotiations.

The source underscored Sudani’s keenness on shifting relations with the coalition to the bilateral level, while also taking into account Iran’s desire to prevent the conflict from spreading. This position aligns with Washington’s that also wants to avoid an escalation.

The PM has even received an invitation from US Vice President Kamal Harris to visit Washington, reflecting the balanced position he has managed to reach between the US and Iran.

Sudani was expected to visit Washington to meet President Joe Biden in September 2023, but the plans fell through for undisclosed reasons.



Lavrov: Moscow Maintains Communication with Damascus, Will Not Withdraw from the Region

Syrian forces stop a car at a checkpoint after taking control of the port of Tartus earlier this month. (AFP)
Syrian forces stop a car at a checkpoint after taking control of the port of Tartus earlier this month. (AFP)
TT

Lavrov: Moscow Maintains Communication with Damascus, Will Not Withdraw from the Region

Syrian forces stop a car at a checkpoint after taking control of the port of Tartus earlier this month. (AFP)
Syrian forces stop a car at a checkpoint after taking control of the port of Tartus earlier this month. (AFP)

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reaffirmed Russia’s commitment to the Middle East, stating that Moscow “has not and will not withdraw from the region.” He emphasized ongoing communication with Syria’s new leadership and expressed readiness to support the political process in the country.

Speaking at a press conference in Moscow on Tuesday, Lavrov attributed Syria’s deteriorating situation to the previous regime, blaming its unwillingness to implement reforms and share power with the opposition.

“The refusal of the former Syrian regime to make any changes or share power with the opposition was one of the primary reasons for its collapse,” he said.

Lavrov noted that over the past decade, since President Bashar al-Assad requested Russian intervention in the Syrian war and the launch of the Astana peace process, Damascus had delayed advancing the political path.

“Despite support from Arab nations, Syrian authorities showed reluctance to move forward politically and sought to maintain the status quo,” he explained.

He highlighted Russia’s repeated calls for the Syrian government to engage with the Constitutional Committee, established during the 2018 Syrian National Dialogue Congress in Sochi, and to actively work on drafting a new constitution.

Lavrov also pointed to economic challenges exacerbated by sanctions, which have stifled Syria’s economy, and US control over oil-rich eastern regions. Resources were exploited to fuel separatist ambitions in northeastern Syria, he remarked.

Moreover, the FM revealed details of Moscow’s earlier discussions with Kurdish groups, reiterating his country’s position that Kurdish rights should be guaranteed within the constitutional frameworks of Syria, Iraq, Iran and Türkiye.

He argued that the previous Syrian regime’s reluctance to engage in political dialogue resulted in stalled reforms proposed by the United Nations, Moscow and Cairo platforms, and Istanbul-based opposition groups. This inaction, he said, created a vacuum that ultimately led to the collapse.

Furthermore, he dismissed claims that his country’s withdrawal from Syria would signal its departure from the Middle East.

“Russia has not and will not leave the region,” he declared. Without directly addressing the status of Russian military bases in Syria, Lavrov emphasized: “Our embassy never left Damascus, and we maintain ongoing communication with the authorities.”

He also stressed Russia’s willingness to facilitate inclusive dialogue involving all national, political and sectarian factions, as well as relevant international stakeholders. Lavrov underscored that recent discussions with Türkiye, Gulf nations, and other parties demonstrated widespread agreement that Russia and Iran must be involved in the Syrian peace process if sustainable results are to be achieved.

For his part, Mikhail Bogdanov, Russia’s Deputy Foreign Minister and Special Presidential Envoy to the Middle East and Africa, reaffirmed Russia’s focus on developments in Syria, describing relations with Damascus as a “priority of Russian foreign policy.”

Reports on Tuesday suggested that Bogdanov might soon lead a Russian delegation to Damascus. However, a Russian diplomatic source informed Asharq Al-Awsat that no date for the visit has been confirmed. The visit, which was reportedly postponed, would mark the first by a senior Russian official to Damascus since the fall of Assad’s regime in December.

Meanwhile, media reports indicated that Moscow is facing logistical challenges in withdrawing military equipment from Syria, due to restrictions imposed by Syrian authorities on the movement of Russian ships in territorial waters.

According to the English-language edition of RT, the Russian ship Sparta 2, designated to transport military equipment and weapons, was denied entry to the Port of Tartus, where Russia maintains its only overseas naval base.