Hamdok in Cairo to Push Forward Efforts to End Sudan War

Former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. (Reuters file photo)
Former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. (Reuters file photo)
TT

Hamdok in Cairo to Push Forward Efforts to End Sudan War

Former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. (Reuters file photo)
Former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok. (Reuters file photo)

A delegation from the Sudanese Coordination of Civil Democratic Forces (Taqaddum), led by former Prime Minister Abdalla Hamdok, kicked off on Friday a visit to Cairo to hold talks with senior Egyptian officials, officials from the Arab League and Sudanese figures residing in Egypt.

The visit is aimed at ending the war in Sudan, said a statement from the group.

Experts said Hamdok’s visit was significant and being held at a “suitable” time, predicting it could have a positive impact.

This is the former PM’s first visit to Egypt since the eruption of the war in mid-April 2023.

The Taqaddum statement added that the visit reflects the historic relations that bind the Sudanese and Egyptian people. It is also part of efforts carried out by the group with friendly countries to help end the war in Sudan.

Officials will discuss the “catastrophic humanitarian conditions endured by our people” and work on effectively responding to it, continued the statement.

“This demands determination from the main parties and regional and international coordination” to address the situation, it stressed.

The statement noted that Egypt is hosting hundreds of thousands of Sudanese people who fled the war, hoping that the visit would be a step forward in intensifying and coordinating efforts to put an end to the conflict.

The Sudanese Coordination of Civil Democratic Forces is a coalition of civil society, youth, vocational and feminist groups working towards bolstering democracy and human rights in Sudan.

The coalition has been active in recent months to help end the war between the army and Rapid Support Forces (RSF). It has held several meetings in neighboring countries to tackle the conflict.

Hamdok had earlier this year called for holding contacts with the army and RSF leaderships. In January, he met with RSF leader Mohammed Hamdan Daglo in Ethiopia.

Head of the head of the Sudanese Alliance Party and leading member of the central council of the Forces of Freedom and Change Kamal Ismail said several Sudanese civilian forces were counting on Cairo to play an effective role in helping end the war through the launch of a political process.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the visit aims at intensifying efforts to end the war, tackling the humanitarian disaster in Sudan and coming up with political solutions.

He noted that the Sudanese Alliance Party had held intense dialogue with Sudanese political powers in recent months, revealing that they have succeeded in building the political ground and foundation for ending the war.

The details related to political issues can be discussed during the post-war phase through the support of Sudan’s neighbors, led by Egypt, that are keen on Sudan restoring its stability, he remarked.

Egypt had in July 2023 hosted a summit for Sudan’s neighbors, including Libya, Chad, Central Africa, South Sudan, Eritrea and Ethiopia.

The gatherers agreed on a communication mechanism led by their foreign ministers to discuss the necessary executive measures to tackle the consequences of the crisis on the future and stability of Sudan.

Cairo has also hosted in recent months meetings of a number of Sudanese political forces, including the central council of the Forces of Freedom and Change, that discussed coming up with a political framework to end the war. They also covered the democratic transition in the country.



Hamas and Mediators Reach Broad Agreement on Road Map, Await Israel’s Response

Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)
Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)
TT

Hamas and Mediators Reach Broad Agreement on Road Map, Await Israel’s Response

Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)
Palestinians mourn victims killed in an Israeli strike on a residential building in central Gaza on Wednesday. (AP)

Hamas and Gaza ceasefire mediators have reached broad agreement on a proposed “road map” during meetings in Cairo, according to two Hamas sources and a Palestinian faction official.

A Hamas delegation led by Khalil al-Hayya left Cairo on Monday evening for Doha to offer condolences following the death of Qatar’s former emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani.

The delegation is expected to travel to Türkiye for talks on mediators’ proposals concerning weapons, other outstanding issues and the future of Palestinian elections.

The discussions will also cover Hamas’ internal leadership election, due to conclude within two weeks after voting was completed in Gaza and the West Bank, with ballots from the movement’s overseas branch still pending.

According to one Hamas source and the Palestinian faction official, negotiators reached broad consensus on nearly all 15 provisions of a road map presented in April by Nickolay Mladenov, the Board of Peace’s High Representative for Gaza, and revised several times since.

They said mediators had developed compromise language for Article 5, governing employees of the Hamas-run administration in Gaza, and Article 8, covering the collection and storage of weapons.

A second Hamas source said 13 of the 15 provisions had been agreed almost in full, while Articles 5 and 8 remained unresolved. He added that partial understandings had been reached on both, but Hamas would first consult its political and military leadership inside and outside Gaza before deciding on the final wording.

All three sources said the meetings brought together mediators from Egypt, Qatar and Türkiye, along with Mladenov and members of his team, including US advisers, as well as Egypt’s intelligence chief, Hassan Rashad.

One Hamas source and the Palestinian faction official described the talks as broadly positive. They said negotiators had agreed on legal formulations concerning government employees that would safeguard their rights while allowing the proposals to be reviewed by legal experts.

On weapons, they said the parties had agreed on language affirming the principle of collecting and storing heavy weapons, while providing further clarification on what constitutes heavy weaponry and how the arrangement would be implemented. The draft also reiterates the dismantling of armed gangs and a simultaneous Israeli withdrawal, in line with language agreed in May.

The two sources said mediators appeared satisfied with the progress and were now awaiting Israel’s response, as well as Mladenov’s position in his capacity as the Board of Peace’s representative.

The sources also emphasized that Hamas had informed mediators, on behalf of the Palestinian factions, that the proposed National Committee for the Administration of Gaza should govern the entire enclave rather than only areas vacated by Israeli forces.

They warned against what they described as Israeli attempts to restrict the committee’s authority in Israeli-controlled Rafah or confine it to designated humanitarian or “safe” zones.

The second Hamas source explained that negotiators had removed language stating that the committee would be responsible only for employees’ rights accruing after it assumed office.

Regarding weapons, he said some provisions had been dropped and replaced with alternative wording, and that a partial understanding had been reached on defining heavy weapons.

However, disagreement remains over the definition of military infrastructure, an issue Hamas plans to discuss during meetings in Türkiye and consultations with its leadership in Gaza before submitting revised proposals to the mediators.

Separately, Hamas official Basem Naim accused Mladenov on Wednesday of favoring Israel following remarks he made after a donors’ conference in Brussels.

Naim disputed Mladenov’s assertion that humanitarian aid flows into Gaza had improved compared with the period before the agreement and accused Israel of continuing military operations despite the ceasefire.

Citing figures from Gaza’s Hamas-run Government Media Office, he said more than 1,100 Palestinians had been killed and over 3,000 wounded, most of them women and children.

He also rejected claims that Hamas had dismissed the road map, saying the movement continues to discuss the proposal and, to its knowledge, it has not yet been presented to Israel. He added that blaming the Palestinian delegation for delays in reaching an agreement reflected a lack of neutrality in the mediation process.


Tunisian Journalist, a Critic of Saied, Sentenced to 1 Year in Prison

Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
TT

Tunisian Journalist, a Critic of Saied, Sentenced to 1 Year in Prison

Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki
Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki

Prominent Tunisian journalist Haythem El Mekki and critic of President Kais Saied said on Wednesday that he was sentenced to one year in prison over posts he made on social media.

El Mekki, known for his political commentary, was a regular host on Mosaique FM's flagship "Midi Show" before he left the station.

Authorities opened an investigation against him in 2024 under Decree 54 -- a law Saied enacted to combat "false news" -- after he decried poor conditions at a public hospital morgue in the coastal city of Sfax.

A lower court had dismissed the case, but an appeals court handed him the 12-month jail term, he said on Facebook.

The National Syndicate of Tunisian Journalists condemned the ruling in a statement, warning of a "worrying trend" and a "climate of intimidation and self-censorship.”

Mekki has been prosecuted three times since 2023, in each case over comments he had made online or in the media.

Although Mekki has recently distanced himself from the media, he remains active on social networks. He is also a member of the editorial board of Rachma, an independent Tunisian media platform.

Freedom of expression was celebrated as a main achievement of the 2011 uprising that toppled president Zine El Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia. But since Saied's July 25, 2021 power grab, several NGOs and the opposition have lamented a decline in rights and freedoms.


Trump’s Remarks on Soleimani Spark Debate in Iraq

US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)
US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)
TT

Trump’s Remarks on Soleimani Spark Debate in Iraq

US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)
US President Donald Trump welcomes Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi to the White House on Tuesday. (AP)

Despite US President Donald Trump’s praise for Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Zaidi during their White House meeting on Tuesday, remarks about the 2020 killing of Iranian Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani and former Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) deputy chief Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis triggered a broad political debate in Iraq.

Greeting al-Zaidi at the White House, Trump described him as “a warrior” and praised the “tremendous chemistry” between them, predicting that the Iraqi premier would remain in office “for a long period of time.”

Turning to the January 2020 US drone strike near Baghdad International Airport, Trump again defended the operation, saying: “And I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today... I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani.”

Without mentioning al-Muhandis by name, Trump added: “By the way, a very bad person went with him. They happened to meet at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq, a leader there, was killed in the same incident.”

He then turned to al-Zaidi with a smile and asked: “So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question before. Maybe you know the answer better than I do.”

Al-Zaidi replied: “At that time, I wasn’t working in politics. This visit is about the future and what we can do together. We’re not concerned with the old past. We’ve had enough of the suffering it caused.”

Munqith Dagher, head of the Independent Institute of Administration and Civil Society Studies (IIACSS) research group, said al-Zaidi had handled the exchange better than many had expected.

Writing on X, he argued that, whether instinctive or the product of media training, the prime minister’s body language and responses spared both himself and Iraq unnecessary embarrassment during one of Trump’s characteristic attempts to put visiting leaders on the spot.

Dagher added that al-Zaidi’s answer could have been even stronger had he delivered it with greater seriousness.

Writer and researcher Adnan Tomeh offered a different assessment, arguing that politics is measured first and foremost by the careful choice of words. He said al-Zaidi could have given a more diplomatic answer that preserved room for maneuver but instead appeared to sidestep the question.

The strongest criticism came from Iran-aligned factions.

Al-Muhandis’ family issued a sharply worded statement accusing Trump of revealing his fear of the consequences of his “crimes,” particularly in Iraq, while rebuking al-Zaidi for distancing himself from the country’s past.

The family also claimed the Washington visit was intended to dismantle the PMF as an “ideological force,” to further US efforts aimed at controlling Iraq’s oil wealth, and to advance calls for disarming armed groups under the slogan of restricting weapons to the state.

Akram al-Kaabi, secretary-general of the US-designated Harakat al-Nujaba, also condemned Trump’s remarks, describing Soleimani and al-Muhandis as “symbols of the resistance.”