Turkish Sources: ‘Back Door’ Diplomacy to Set Stage for Erdogan-Assad Meeting

Negotiations are underway to hold a meeting between Erdogan and Assad (file photo)
Negotiations are underway to hold a meeting between Erdogan and Assad (file photo)
TT

Turkish Sources: ‘Back Door’ Diplomacy to Set Stage for Erdogan-Assad Meeting

Negotiations are underway to hold a meeting between Erdogan and Assad (file photo)
Negotiations are underway to hold a meeting between Erdogan and Assad (file photo)

Turkish sources said that Türkiye and Syria have been engaging in “back-channel diplomacy” to set the stage for a meeting between Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Syrian counterpart, Bashar al-Assad.

Despite the outstanding obstacles, which include the disagreement over the Turkish withdrawal from northern Syria, the sources confirmed that the meeting is the most important step to normalize relations, according to an article published in the Turkish Hurriyet newspaper.

The sources added that the date and location of the meeting are yet to be agreed upon, but communications are ongoing on the Ankara-Moscow-Damascus line.

In a television interview on Thursday, Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Guler said that Damascus setting conditions, such as military withdrawal from northern Syria, was tantamount to “a rejection of stability and peace.”

“We may hold ministerial-level meetings, and President Bashar al-Assad’s government must accept a comprehensive constitution and hold free elections, then Türkiye will be ready to work with whoever comes to power after the elections.”

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan had previously pointed to talks with Syrian officials over the place and date of the meeting between Erdogan and Assad, indicating that it may be held in a third country if the two sides agree.

Fidan noted that Damascus is ready to hold a meeting without any preconditions, saying: “What I’ve seen in my communications with the other party is that they are open to negotiation. There are no preconditions that have been communicated to us so far.”

Writer Abdul Qadirselvi said in his article in Hurriyet on Friday that with the danger of the Gaza war expanding to other areas of the region, the normalization of Turkish-Syrian relations has become important.

He added that any crisis in the Israeli-Lebanese-Iranian triangle will affect the two countries more than others.

“If the American-Israeli plan succeeds in transferring the war to Lebanon, alarm bells will ring for Syria, and such a dangerous development will also deeply affect Türkiye,” he stated.

Qadirselvi pointed to recent statements made by the former advisor to the US Department of Defense, Douglas MacGregor, regarding US preparations to attack Türkiye, by supplying the Kurdistan Workers Party - People’s Protection Units (YPG) with weapons and air defense systems.

The Turkish writer argued that had it not been for Ankara’s pressure, elections would have been held in northeastern Syria, in the areas controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), and an independent administration would have been established.

 



Two Missiles Delay International Coalition Withdrawal from Iraq

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fouad Hussein and his American counterpart Antony Blinken (the government media)
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fouad Hussein and his American counterpart Antony Blinken (the government media)
TT

Two Missiles Delay International Coalition Withdrawal from Iraq

Iraqi Foreign Minister Fouad Hussein and his American counterpart Antony Blinken (the government media)
Iraqi Foreign Minister Fouad Hussein and his American counterpart Antony Blinken (the government media)

Washington is mulling to cancel understandings with Iraq on the withdrawal of its forces from the country as Iraqi officials said that the recent missile attack on the Ain al-Asad base was the reason behind this shift in the US decision.

Official sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that Washington has halted the negotiations process over the pullout of its troops from Iraq.

The sources said: “The situation is very complicated due to the recent attack on Ain al-Asad.”

The Iraqi Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement on Thursday that Baghdad decided to postpone the date of the end of the mission of the international coalition led by the United States.

“The announcement of the end of the military mission of the international coalition in Iraq has been postponed due to the recent developments,” it said.

The Iraqi military base, which hosts American advisors, was attacked by two missiles, claimed by an unknown group calling itself “revolutionaries.”

Washington said that a number of US soldiers stationed at the base as part of the international coalition’s missions in Iraq were injured in the attack.

Meanwhile, the US State Department denied that the negotiations with the Iraqis were about the forces’ withdrawal, but rather about developing relations and coordinating security efforts.

On Thursday evening, US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said Washington discussed with the Iraqi government the future of the international coalition.

“At no time did we discuss the withdrawal of American forces from Iraq,” he noted, but pointed that talks were underway on the transition to what he described as a bilateral security partnership.

The Iraqi Foreign Ministry swiftly replied to the American statements by saying they were “inaccurate.”

In a press statement, the ministry emphasized that the work of the Supreme Military Committee focused during the past months on assessing the threat of the ISIS organization, with the aim of reaching a final date for ending the international mission.

“On this basis, the presence of international coalition advisors of all nationalities on Iraqi soil will be terminated,” it added.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, Hussein Allawi, advisor to the Iraqi Prime Minister, said that the Foreign Ministry’s statement indicated that those working on Iraqi soil were advisors to the international coalition, and that the Iraqi government was seeking to end their mission in accordance with the decision taken by the government in January.

“After ten years, Iraqi security forces are able to fully manage national sovereignty, and therefore the Supreme Military Committee has decisive meetings to set a timetable for ending the coalition’s mission,” he remarked.