Türkiye: No Agreement with Iraq to End Military Presence

Turkish and Iraqi defense ministers signed a memorandum of understanding to combat terrorism in Ankara on Aug. 15 (Turkish Foreign Ministry)
Turkish and Iraqi defense ministers signed a memorandum of understanding to combat terrorism in Ankara on Aug. 15 (Turkish Foreign Ministry)
TT

Türkiye: No Agreement with Iraq to End Military Presence

Turkish and Iraqi defense ministers signed a memorandum of understanding to combat terrorism in Ankara on Aug. 15 (Turkish Foreign Ministry)
Turkish and Iraqi defense ministers signed a memorandum of understanding to combat terrorism in Ankara on Aug. 15 (Turkish Foreign Ministry)

Türkiye has stressed that the memorandum of understanding on military and security cooperation and counter-terrorism signed with Iraq does not include any provision regarding the termination of Turkish military presence on Iraqi soil.

The Center for Combating Disinformation, affiliated with the Directorate of Communications at the Turkish Presidency, denied media reports that the MoU signed by Turkish Defense Minister Yasar Güler and Iraqi Defense Minister Thabet Muhammad al-Abbasi, aims to end the presence of Turkish military forces in Iraqi territory.

In a statement on Thursday, the center said that such reports are entirely incorrect and that there is no such clause in the MoU concerning military and security coordination and counter-terrorism signed between Ankara and Baghdad.

The statement added that under the memorandum of understanding, the two countries will establish a joint security coordination center in Baghdad and a joint training and cooperation center in Bashiqa.

“These centers will enable the elimination of threats posed by terrorist organizations to the sovereignty of both countries and their internal and regional security,” it noted.

The statement added that Türkiye’s war against terrorism “will continue resolutely, both domestically and beyond its borders,” and urged not to rely on claims from external sources but to consider only official statements.

In the same context, a Turkish Defense Ministry official confirmed that the text of the MoU circulating in some media is “not accurate” and differs from the text signed by the defense ministers of the two countries.

In a press briefing on Thursday, the military official stated that according to the MoU, the two parties will provide military training, law enforcement, counter-terrorism measures, joint border security, and the fight against illegal immigration and border infiltration.

He added that a joint security coordination center will be established in Baghdad, which will be jointly managed by a general appointed by both Iraq and Türkiye.

At the conclusion of the first meetings of the Joint Planning Committee and the fourth meeting of the High-Level Security Mechanism, held in Ankara on Aug. 15, the two countries confirmed their desire to strengthen their relations in various fields, with a focus on security coordination and combating terrorist organizations.

This came in accordance with the memorandum of understanding on military and security cooperation and counter-terrorism, which aims to end the threat posed by the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).



Progress at Talks on Sudan’s War Limited by Army’s No-Show, Mediators Say

UN Envoy for Sudan, Tom Perriello attends a press briefing on sidelines of Sudan peace talks at the US Mission in Geneva, Switzerland, August 23, 2024. (Reuters)
UN Envoy for Sudan, Tom Perriello attends a press briefing on sidelines of Sudan peace talks at the US Mission in Geneva, Switzerland, August 23, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Progress at Talks on Sudan’s War Limited by Army’s No-Show, Mediators Say

UN Envoy for Sudan, Tom Perriello attends a press briefing on sidelines of Sudan peace talks at the US Mission in Geneva, Switzerland, August 23, 2024. (Reuters)
UN Envoy for Sudan, Tom Perriello attends a press briefing on sidelines of Sudan peace talks at the US Mission in Geneva, Switzerland, August 23, 2024. (Reuters)

US-led mediators said on Friday they had secured guarantees from Sudan's warring parties at talks in Geneva to improve access for humanitarian aid, but that the Sudanese army's absence from the parley had hindered progress.

Over 10 days of talks a new group of mediators including Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates tried to negotiate more aid and protection for civilians facing famine, mass displacement and spreading disease after 16 months of war between the army and Rapid Support Forces (RSF) paramilitaries.

The mediators, calling themselves the Aligned for Advancing Lifesaving and Peace in Sudan (ALPS) Group, said they had secured promises to let aid flow through the Adre border crossing from Chad into the Darfur region and along the Dabbah Road from Port Sudan on the Red Sea. They also reported progress towards opening another route through the Sennar Junction.

However, they acknowledged that any progress fell far short of the response needed for one of the world's worst humanitarian crises.

"We hope that this will be a source of momentum for much bigger steps and progress down the road," US Sudan Envoy Tom Perriello told a press conference in Geneva.

"The sad thing is, the crisis in Sudan is so severe that we could do four of these (rounds of negotiations) and still be barely scratching the surface of what Sudanese people deserve."

In an illustration of the challenges, only a fraction of the aid available at Adre has been dispatched this week, as the army-aligned government imposed a halt to movements after the crossing opened for the first time in months.

Intense diplomatic lobbying failed to persuade the army to send a formal delegation to Switzerland, although mediators said they were in contact with the army virtually.

"Though we were in consistent communication with SAF (Sudanese Armed Forces) virtually, we regret their decision not to be present, and we believe that limited our ability to make more substantial progress towards key issues, particularly a national cessation of hostilities," ALPS said in a statement.

The war in Sudan began in April 2023 when competition between the army and the RSF, who had previously shared power after staging a coup, flared into open warfare.

The two sides had been seeking to protect their power and extensive economic interests as the international community promoted a plan for a transition towards civilian rule.

Overlapping efforts in pursuit of a ceasefire, including Saudi- and US-led talks in Jeddah, have not eased the fighting.

"We do believe that the national cessation of hostilities is possible. We know that that is going to take a great deal of work," said Perriello.