Debate Resurfaces Over Political Agreement After Al-Mashhadani Elected Iraqi Speaker

Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)
Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)
TT

Debate Resurfaces Over Political Agreement After Al-Mashhadani Elected Iraqi Speaker

Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)
Iraqi Parliament Speaker Mahmoud al-Mashhadani (Reuters)

Less than a week after the Iraqi parliament elected Mahmoud al-Mashhadani as speaker, the “political agreement” document has returned to the spotlight due to delays in its implementation caused by disagreements.

The speaker's position had been vacant for nearly a year after former speaker Mohamed al-Halbousi was dismissed by the Federal Supreme Court amid Sunni-Sunni and Sunni-Shiite tensions.

Al-Mashhadani, who had been competing for about nine months with four other candidates, including Salem al-Essawi, was elected with broad Sunni support and full backing from Shiite factions, as a key member of the Shiite Coordination Framework defended his candidacy.

A former Sunni politician and ex-MP told Asharq Al-Awsat that “practically, there is no Sunni-Sunni dispute over al-Mashhadani.”

“The issue is with his nomination process and the involvement of a Shiite party, which shouldn't be a factor, especially when Sunnis should have the right to choose their candidate based on sectarian quotas,” the source noted.

They added that “the delay in electing a speaker for a year was caused by Shiite forces insisting on a specific Sunni candidate, al-Mashhadani.”

“This sparked debate within the Sunni bloc, though all Sunnis, before this insistence, saw al-Mashhadani as one of the last respected historical Sunni leaders after 2003, often called 'the elder' because of his age,” the source noted.

The politician also pointed out that “Sunnis have key demands, which were part of the current government led by Mohamed Shia' al-Sudani, including the law on general amnesty, which is still being debated after being watered down, as well as the dissolution of the Accountability and Justice Commission and its shift to a judicial matter instead of being used against the Sunni community.”

At a meeting of the “State Administration Coalition” on Thursday evening, discussions on implementing the political agreement document resurfaced after the parliament resumed its sessions and extended its legislative term following the election of a new speaker.

According to sources, during the meeting, which included al-Sudani, al-Mashhadani, and leaders from the Shiite Coordination Framework, as well as Sunni and Kurdish representatives, Al-Siyada Alliance leader Khamis al-Khanjar presented the document.

He criticized the failure to implement Sunni demands, despite two years passing since the document was signed, and warned that further delays would have consequences.

Al-Khanjar, who recently resigned from the Al-Siyada party after being included in the Accountability and Justice file, had initially supported al-Mashhadani’s candidacy for speaker, despite backing his own candidate, Salem al-Essawi, earlier.



Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
TT

Berri to Asharq Al-Awsat: Resolution 1701 Only Tangible Proposal to End Lebanon Conflict

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and US envoy Amos Hochstein in Beirut. (AFP file)

Politicians in Beirut said they have not received any credible information about Washington resuming its mediation efforts towards reaching a ceasefire in Lebanon despite reports to the contrary.

Efforts came to a halt after US envoy Amos Hochstein’s last visit to Beirut three weeks ago.

Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri dismissed the reports as media fodder, saying nothing official has been received.

Lebanon is awaiting tangible proposals on which it can build its position, he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The only credible proposal on the table is United Nations Security Council resolution 1701, whose articles must be implemented in full by Lebanon and Israel, “not just Lebanon alone,” he stressed.

Resolution 1701 was issued to end the 2006 July war between Hezbollah and Israel and calls for removing all weapons from southern Lebanon and that the only armed presence there be restricted to the army and UN peacekeepers.

Western diplomatic sources in Beirut told Asharq Al-Awsat that Berri opposes one of the most important articles of the proposed solution to end the current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel.

He is opposed to the German and British participation in the proposed mechanism to monitor the implementation of resolution 1701. The other participants are the United States and France.

Other sources said Berri is opposed to the mechanism itself since one is already available and it is embodied in the UN peacekeepers, whom the US and France can join.

The sources revealed that the solution to the conflict has a foreign and internal aspect. The foreign one includes Israel, the US and Russia and seeks guarantees that would prevent Hezbollah from rearming itself. The second covers Lebanese guarantees on the implementation of resolution 1701.

Berri refused to comment on the media reports, but told Asharq Al-Awsat that this was the first time that discussions are being held about guarantees.

He added that “Israel is now in crisis because it has failed to achieve its military objectives, so it has resorted to more killing and destruction undeterred.”

He highlighted the “steadfastness of the UN peacekeepers in the South who have refused to leave their positions despite the repeated Israeli attacks.”