Sudan, Russia Agree on Port Sudan Naval Base

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R) and his Sudanese counterpart Ali Yusuf al-Sharif shake hands during press conference in Moscow, on February 12, 2025. (Photo by Maxim Shemetov / POOL / AFP)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R) and his Sudanese counterpart Ali Yusuf al-Sharif shake hands during press conference in Moscow, on February 12, 2025. (Photo by Maxim Shemetov / POOL / AFP)
TT
20

Sudan, Russia Agree on Port Sudan Naval Base

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R) and his Sudanese counterpart Ali Yusuf al-Sharif shake hands during press conference in Moscow, on February 12, 2025. (Photo by Maxim Shemetov / POOL / AFP)
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov (R) and his Sudanese counterpart Ali Yusuf al-Sharif shake hands during press conference in Moscow, on February 12, 2025. (Photo by Maxim Shemetov / POOL / AFP)

Sudan and Russia have reached a final agreement on the establishment of a Russian naval base in Port Sudan on the Red Sea, Sudanese Foreign Minister Ali Yusuf al-Sharif announced on Wednesday.

The plan has been discussed for years but never materialized due to the volatile security situation in Sudan.

The deal allows Russia to set up a naval base with up to 300 Russian troops, and to simultaneously keep up to four navy ships, including nuclear-powered ones, in the strategic Port Sudan.

“There are no obstacles, we are in complete agreement,” Sharif said following talks in Moscow with his Russian counterpart, Sergei Lavrov.

He did not elaborate on the terms of the current agreement, and whether the two sides had introduced new amendments to the deal reached between the two countries in 2017.

Lavrov avoided mentioning the military base, but said that during the meeting with Sharif, both sides paid special attention to the war in Sudan.

“We are interested in normalizing the situation in this friendly country, our good traditional partner in Africa, as soon as possible,” the Russian FM said.

“We reaffirmed our principled position on the need for an early cessation of hostilities along with the launch of a national dialogue, which should include representatives of all political, ethnic and religious groups in Sudan,” Lavrov said.

He noted that according to Sharif, the Sudanese leadership published two days ago a roadmap that should pave the way for progress in this direction.

Last December, Russia's embassy in Sudan refuted media reports alleging that the Sudanese authorities refused to host a Russian naval logistics support base.

Earlier in June, Mohamed Siraj, Sudan’s Ambassador to Russia, reaffirmed his country’s dedication to constructing a Russian naval base on the Red Sea.

In 2017, Khartoum and Moscow agreed during a visit by Sudan's ousted former president Omar al-Bashir to Moscow, to establish the base. But in 2021, weeks after Khartoum decided to freeze the deal, Moscow rushed to approve the binding agreement to establish the base in Sudan by passing it through all the legal mechanisms.

Russian President Vladimir Putin referred the agreement to the State Duma for ratification, in the second step of the final approval of the agreement after the Russian government formally ratified it a week earlier.

The Sudanese leadership had informed Moscow of its official position to freeze the deal through military and diplomatic channels.

A Russian source told Asharq Al-Awsat at the time that after referring the document to the Duma and Senate, Moscow is seeking to give it full legal force. This will allow Russia to negotiate later with Sudan to introduce some amendments.

Meanwhile in the Sudanese capital, Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Mohamed Othman al-Hussein said that “Khartoum intends to review the agreement,” noting that it was approved by the previous government and not the parliament.

Despite Sudan’s position, the Russian Foreign Ministry announced that the agreement remains binding for both parties because it was signed on July 23, 2019, by the representative of the Transitional Military Council, that is, after the change of the political system in Sudan.

Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova noted that the document has not yet been ratified by the Sudanese party because there is currently no legislative authority in the country with such powers.
Zakharova hinted at Russia’s readiness to show flexibility in revising the text of the agreement and said Moscow was interested in strengthening cooperation with Khartoum.
She explained that even before the agreement enters into force, changes can be introduced to its text at the discretion of both parties.

The agreement stipulates establishing a logistics center for the Russian fleet on the coast of Sudan in the Red Sea. It grants Russia the right to use an operational logistic center in Port Sudan, provided that the maximum number of working personnel does not exceed 300 soldiers, and no more than four Russian warships will be able to stay there at one time.
The agreement is valid for 25 years, with the possibility of extension.



Iraqis Urged to Protest Israel as Militias Warn US Against Intervention

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani attending a meeting for the Coordination Framework (INA)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani attending a meeting for the Coordination Framework (INA)
TT
20

Iraqis Urged to Protest Israel as Militias Warn US Against Intervention

Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani attending a meeting for the Coordination Framework (INA)
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani attending a meeting for the Coordination Framework (INA)

Iraq’s public support for Iran in its escalating missile standoff with Israel has triggered concern that the country could be drawn into a wider conflict involving both Washington and Tel Aviv, as threats from powerful armed factions intensify.

 

Major Shi’ite parties within the pro-Iran Coordination Framework – including Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani – ramped up their backing for Tehran by urging nationwide demonstrations in solidarity with Iran, the Iran-aligned Asaib Ahl al-Haq militia warned it may target US interests in Iraq if Washington joins Israel militarily.

 

Framework Condemns Israeli Strikes

 

The Coordination Framework held a late-night emergency meeting on Sunday, attended by Sudani, to discuss the unfolding political and security developments.

 

In a statement seen by Asharq Al-Awsat, the bloc denounced what it called Israel’s "repeated acts of aggression," including recent strikes on Iranian territory that killed a number of commanders and scientists.

 

“The Framework strongly condemns the Zionist entity’s repeated hostile behavior, particularly the latest attacks on Iran,” the statement read. It called on the international community, especially regional states, to take a stand against Israel’s “arrogance” and push for an end to its aggression.

 

The bloc also urged Iraqis to take to the streets in protest and to show support for Iran’s resilience. It reiterated its rejection of Iraqi airspace being used for attacks on neighboring countries but added that Iraq should continue “playing a role in finding a solution and containing the fallout of the crisis triggered by Israel’s ongoing strikes”.

 

Parliament Denies Israeli Attacks Launched from Iraq

 

In a separate development, Iraq’s parliamentary Security and Defense Committee rejected Iranian claims that recent Israeli attacks on Iran were launched from Iraqi territory.

 

“There is no evidence that Israeli airstrikes targeting Iran originated from Iraqi soil,” said committee member Yasser Watout. “We’ve spoken to military leadership, air force officials and aerial surveillance units – all confirm no such activity occurred”.

 

The denial follows remarks by Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who alleged that some of the recent attacks were launched from inside Iraq. He urged Baghdad to prevent its territory from being used against neighboring states.

 

Watout said Iraq “did not, and will not, allow its territory to be used for attacking any of its neighbors,” calling the Iranian allegations baseless.

 

Militias Warn of Retaliation

 

The warning from Asaib Ahl al-Haq came a day after Iraq’s Kataib Hezbollah said it would consider entering the fight against Israel if the United States militarily backs Tel Aviv.

 

In a statement on Monday, Asaib spokesman Jawad al-Talibawi said, “We warn the US administration of the consequences of participating alongside its Israeli ally in attacking the Iran”.

 

He pledged renewed allegiance to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, vowing to “offer our lives in defense of Islam and its people”.

 

Kataib Hezbollah, led by Abu Hussein al-Hamidawi, also threatened to strike US bases across the region if Washington joins the war. In a statement on Sunday night, Hamidawi said Iran does not require military assistance to confront Israel, asserting it has the “men and means” to defeat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

 

“We are closely monitoring the movements of the American enemy’s forces,” he said. “Should the US intervene, we will directly target its interests and military bases in the region, without hesitation”.

 

He called on the Iraqi government, the Coordination Framework, and what he described as “loyal defenders” to take a firm position to prevent the conflict from spiraling further. Hamidawi also demanded the closure of the US embassy in Baghdad and the expulsion of American forces from Iraq.

 

US Embassy Issues Security Alert

 

Meanwhile, the US embassy in Baghdad issued a security warning to American citizens, citing a heightened risk of violence or attacks against US interests in Iraq. The alert advised citizens to avoid areas frequented by foreigners and to steer clear of large gatherings.

 

The threat of Iraq being pulled into a broader confrontation underscores the region’s volatility as tensions soar between Iran and Israel – and as armed factions within Iraq flex their influence in a bid to shift the country's strategic posture.