‘We Acted Arrogantly’: Israel Presents Some Findings of Its Oct. 7 Investigations 

The destroyed contents of a dishwasher and household goods are seen at a home at Kibbutz Nir Oz following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack. (Reuters)
The destroyed contents of a dishwasher and household goods are seen at a home at Kibbutz Nir Oz following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack. (Reuters)
TT
20

‘We Acted Arrogantly’: Israel Presents Some Findings of Its Oct. 7 Investigations 

The destroyed contents of a dishwasher and household goods are seen at a home at Kibbutz Nir Oz following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack. (Reuters)
The destroyed contents of a dishwasher and household goods are seen at a home at Kibbutz Nir Oz following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack. (Reuters)

The Israeli army started presenting part of the findings of its investigation into the Hamas attack on the Nahal Oz military outpost on October 7, 2023.

The probe concluded that the Nahal Oz base has become a clear symbol of the army’s “neglect and security failure” on that day.

The delayed military response and security lapses led to the killing of 53 Israeli soldiers and the capture of 10 others from the Nahal Oz outpost, situated less than one kilometer from the Gaza border, the investigations showed.

The official findings of the probe are to be presented to relevant families and then made available to the public.

They mainly revealed that prior to the attack, soldiers at the Nahal Oz outpost say their warnings about suspicious Hamas activity were repeatedly ignored.

‘We acted arrogantly’

According to the investigation, Hamas collected accurate intelligence data about Nahal Oz and the Yiftach military base from afar for years prior to launching the deadly assault and was intimately familiar with the layout of the bases and their vulnerabilities.

The probe showed that the Israeli political leadership had ignored the military threats prior to the attack.

Speaking to a forum of senior officers, Brig. Gen. Yossi Sariel, head of the military intelligence Unit 8200 said: “We, and I above all others, did not do our duty, did not learn the lesson and acted arrogantly.”

The investigations showed that Hamas had detailed knowledge of the layout of the Nahal Oz base, including the locations of various rooms, guard positions, and the areas with lighter security.

Timing of the attack

According to the probe, Hamas assumed that the timing of the attack should be on a religious holiday or weekend, because fewer forces remain on the base at those times.

The night before the attack, at 6:00 pm, Hamas gave its fighters instructions on how to attack the base, and the squad commanders began preparations.

Warning signs had emerged on that night, but were ignored by the military leaderships. Senior officers alerted to the unusual movement concluded that there was no need to send troops down to the border.

The investigations found that at the time of the assault, only one guard was stationed at the front gate.

Although there were double the number of Israeli soldiers than Hamas gunmen, they lacked firepower and weapons.

Also, had troops been instructed to take up their positions, “the battle picture would have looked different,” the report said.

The probe showed that Hamas was able to easily kill large groups of Israeli soldiers who had gathered in bomb shelters, according to their plan.

Timeline

At 6:30 am, the attack began. Around 65 Hamas fighters stormed the base, located 800 meters from the border with Gaza. There were 162 soldiers stationed at the base, 90 of whom were armed, with 81 combat soldiers.

At 6:45 am, the deputy battalion commander was wounded shortly after the attack started, and the first wave of Hamas fighters infiltrated the post 20 minutes later.

At 7:30 am, Israeli soldiers were unable to repel the attackers. Ten minutes later, an Israeli army armored personnel carrier arrived with a company commander, marking the first military use of vehicles during the attack.

At 7:50 am, the Israeli forces were preparing for a counterattack, but by 8:20 am, part of the force was ambushed and killed, disrupting the counteroffensive.

At 8:53 am, Hamas fighters managed to destroy an Israeli tank that was stationed at the site.

At 9:00 am, a second wave of approximately 50 Hamas fighters arrived at the site.

At 10:00 am, a third wave of 100 more fighters entered the base.

At noon, the operations room was burned.

At 2:00 pm, the rescue forces arrive to evacuate the wounded.

At 8:00 pm, the base was completely cleared of Israeli forces.



Report: US, Israel Discuss Possible US-led Administration for Gaza  

Mourners grieve a Palestinian victim killed in an Israeli army airstrike in the Gaza city on Tuesday. (EPA) 
Mourners grieve a Palestinian victim killed in an Israeli army airstrike in the Gaza city on Tuesday. (EPA) 
TT
20

Report: US, Israel Discuss Possible US-led Administration for Gaza  

Mourners grieve a Palestinian victim killed in an Israeli army airstrike in the Gaza city on Tuesday. (EPA) 
Mourners grieve a Palestinian victim killed in an Israeli army airstrike in the Gaza city on Tuesday. (EPA) 

The United States and Israel have discussed the possibility of Washington leading a temporary post-war administration of Gaza, five people familiar with the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.

The “high-level” consultations have centered around a transitional government headed by a US official that would oversee Gaza until it had been demilitarized and stabilized, and a viable Palestinian administration had emerged, the sources said.

According to the discussions, which remain preliminary, there would be no fixed timeline for how long such a US-led administration would last, which would depend on the situation on the ground, the five sources said.

The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to discuss the talks publicly, compared the proposal to the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq that Washington established in 2003, shortly after the US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.

The authority was perceived by many Iraqis as an occupying force and it transferred power to an interim Iraqi government in 2004 after failing to contain a growing insurgency.

Other countries would be invited to take part in the US-led authority in Gaza, the sources said, without identifying which ones.

They said the administration would draw on Palestinian technocrats but would exclude the Hamas movement and the Palestinian Authority, which holds limited authority in the occupied West Bank.

Hamas, which has ruled Gaza since 2007, sparked the current war when its fighters stormed into southern Israeli communities on October 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and capturing another 251.

The sources said it remained unclear whether any agreement could be reached. Discussions had not progressed to the point of considering who might take on core roles, they said.

The sources did not specify which side had put forward the proposal nor provide further details of the talks.

In response to Reuters questions, a State Department spokesperson did not comment directly on whether there had been discussions with Israel about a US-led provisional authority in Gaza, saying they could not speak to ongoing negotiations.

“We want peace, and the immediate release of the hostages,” the spokesperson said, adding that: “The pillars of our approach remain resolute: stand with Israel, stand for peace.”

The office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declined to comment.

According to Reuters, a US-led provisional authority in Gaza would draw Washington deeper into the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and mark its biggest Middle East intervention since the Iraq invasion.

Such a move would carry significant risks of a backlash from both allies and adversaries in the Middle East, if Washington were perceived as an occupying power in Gaza, two of the sources said.

Israel's leadership, including Netanyahu, firmly rejects any role in Gaza for the Palestinian Authority, which it accuses of being anti-Israeli. Netanyahu also opposes Palestinian sovereignty.

Netanyahu said on Monday that Israel would expand its attacks in Gaza and that more Gazans would be moved “for their own safety.”

Israel is still seeking to recover 59 hostages being held in the enclave. Its offensive has so far killed more than 52,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health ministry data.

Some members of Netanyahu's right-coalition have called publicly for what they describe as the “voluntary” mass migration of Palestinians from Gaza and for the reconstruction of Jewish settlements inside the coastal enclave.

But behind closed doors, some Israeli officials have also been weighing proposals over the future of Gaza that sources say assumes that there won't be a mass exodus of Palestinians from Gaza, such as the US-led provisional administration.

Among those include restricting reconstruction to designated security zones, dividing the territory and establishing permanent military bases, said four sources, who include foreign diplomats and former Israeli officials briefed on the proposals.