Moody’s Affirms Lebanon’s “C” Rating Amid Deep Crisis, Fragile Reform Prospects

A woman takes a photo near an “I Love Beirut” sign in downtown Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)
A woman takes a photo near an “I Love Beirut” sign in downtown Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)
TT
20

Moody’s Affirms Lebanon’s “C” Rating Amid Deep Crisis, Fragile Reform Prospects

A woman takes a photo near an “I Love Beirut” sign in downtown Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)
A woman takes a photo near an “I Love Beirut” sign in downtown Beirut, Lebanon (Reuters)

Moody’s Investors Service has reaffirmed Lebanon’s sovereign credit rating at “C,” underscoring the country’s entrenched economic, financial, and social crisis that has persisted since 2020.

The rating reflects the agency’s expectation that losses for holders of Lebanese sovereign bonds could exceed 65%.

Lebanon has been mired in a financial collapse since 2019, which intensified following the government’s default on its sovereign debt in March 2020. This unraveling led to the dramatic devaluation of the national currency, hyperinflation, and a sharp deterioration in public services.

Despite numerous reform pledges, the country has remained locked in a downward spiral, deeply affecting the livelihoods of its citizens and the health of its economy.

In its latest report, Moody’s noted that the newly appointed government under Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who assumed office on February 8, 2025, has started to address some of these longstanding challenges.

Nevertheless, Lebanon continues to face major structural hurdles, particularly the need for comprehensive restructuring of government debt, the central bank, and the commercial banking sector. Securing international financial support from the International Monetary Fund and other global partners hinges on the successful implementation of these reforms.

Moody’s acknowledged some recent positive steps. These include amendments to the banking secrecy law approved by Parliament on April 24, 2025, allowing regulators access to banking records for up to ten years.

Furthermore, the Cabinet approved a draft law on April 12, 2025, aimed at restructuring the banking sector while prioritizing the protection of small depositors. These measures are viewed as critical for unlocking external assistance.

However, the core challenge remains unresolved: how to distribute the estimated $70 billion in financial system losses among stakeholders, including the government, central bank, commercial banks, and depositors. Previous reform attempts have stumbled over this politically and socially sensitive issue, highlighting the difficulty in forging a unified national response.

Following a staggering 25% contraction in real GDP in 2020, Lebanon experienced a brief phase of relative stability before the economy shrank again by 7.5% in 2024 due to intensifying conflict on Lebanese territory.

Moody’s forecasts a modest economic rebound in 2025, with growth projected at 2.5%, potentially rising to 3.5% in 2026, assuming an agreement on reform is reached.

The rating agency noted that Lebanon’s economic strength is severely weakened by the collapse of its pre-crisis economic model, which depended heavily on foreign capital inflows. Institutional and governance quality remain among the weakest globally, despite recent reform efforts.

Lebanon’s fiscal position is deeply strained, reinforcing Moody’s outlook for significant creditor losses once debt restructuring is undertaken. Additionally, the country faces elevated risks related to political instability, fiscal liquidity, banking sector fragility, and external vulnerabilities, all of which are unlikely to improve before the restructuring process is complete.

Moody’s does not expect Lebanon’s rating to improve in the near term given the scale of its unresolved challenges.

Any future upgrade will depend on the pace of fiscal and institutional reforms, the government’s ability to generate sustainable revenue, and the economy’s successful shift to a more resilient growth model. Long-term debt sustainability will also require the ability to produce and maintain large primary fiscal surpluses.



Boeing Shares Drop after Air India Crash

A tail of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane that crashed is seen stuck on a building after the incident in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave
A tail of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane that crashed is seen stuck on a building after the incident in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave
TT
20

Boeing Shares Drop after Air India Crash

A tail of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane that crashed is seen stuck on a building after the incident in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave
A tail of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner plane that crashed is seen stuck on a building after the incident in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS/Amit Dave

The crash of an Air India 787-8 Dreamliner jet minutes after taking off on Thursday poses another challenge for Boeing, whose new CEO has been trying to rebuild trust following a series of safety and production challenges.

It was not clear what caused the crash, as air disasters can occur for a number of different reasons. The London-bound plane crashed in India's western city of Ahmedabad, authorities said, in the world's worst aviation disaster in a decade.

The disaster, in which most of the 242 people on board were killed, muddies the efforts of CEO Kelly Ortberg to move past its recent issues after the planemaker hit production targets in May and received a vote of confidence from airline bosses in recent months. Shares were down about 4.9% on Thursday. Boeing said it was aware of the initial reports and was working to gather more information.

Before the crash, airline executives had been voicing greater confidence in Boeing's rebound in deliveries and in Ortberg's leadership after years of reputational damage for the planemaker.

At a recent summit in New Delhi, executives were more optimistic over Boeing's crises around safety and regulation. The widebody 787 planes, one of the most modern passenger aircraft in service, have never had a fatal crash until the Air India incident. They were grounded in 2013 due to battery issues, but no one was reported injured.

"It's a knee-jerk reaction (to the incident) and there's revised fears of the problems that plagued Boeing aircraft and Boeing itself in recent years," said Chris Beauchamp, analyst at IG Group.

Boeing's narrowbody 737 MAX jets were grounded for years following two fatal crashes and have faced years of scrutiny and production delays. Last year, the US planemaker came under renewed scrutiny after a door plug blew off a 737 MAX 9 mid-flight, prompting a temporary FAA grounding and fresh concerns over quality control.

Shares of Spirit AeroSystems, a key supplier, and GE Aerospace, which makes engines for the jet, also fell about 2% each. GE Aerospace said it has activated its emergency response team and would support the investigation, but did not specify if the Air India aircraft was equipped with its engines.

The engine maker did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Boeing's outstanding debt also sold off modestly after the crash. Its bonds maturing in May 2029 were trading at 88 basis points over Treasuries, or 10 basis points wider than on Wednesday, according to a bond broker.