‘Venom 3’ Tops Box Office Again, While Tom Hanks Film Struggles

‘Venom 3’ Tops Box Office Again, While Tom Hanks Film Struggles
TT

‘Venom 3’ Tops Box Office Again, While Tom Hanks Film Struggles

‘Venom 3’ Tops Box Office Again, While Tom Hanks Film Struggles

“Venom: The Last Dance” enjoyed another weekend at the top of the box office. The Sony release starring Tom Hardy added $26.1 million in ticket sales, according to studio estimates Sunday.
It was a relatively quiet weekend for North American movie theaters leading up to the presidential election. Charts were dominated by big studio holdovers, like “Venom 3,” “The Wild Robot” and “Smile 2,” while audiences roundly rejected the Tom Hanks, Robin Wright and Robert Zemeckis reunion “Here.” Thirty years after “Forrest Gump,” “Here” opened to only $5 million from 2,647 locations.
“Venom 3” only fell 49% in its second weekend, which is a notably small drop for a superhero film, though it didn’t exactly open like one either. In two weeks, the movie has made over $90 million domestically; The first two opened to over $80 million. Globally, the picture is brighter given that it has already crossed the $300 million threshold.
Meanwhile, Universal and Illumination’s “The Wild Robot” continues to attract moviegoers even six weeks in (and when it’s available by video on demand), placing second with $7.6 million. That's up 11% from last weekend. The animated charmer has made over $121 million in North America and $269 million worldwide, The Associated Press reported.
"'The Wild Robot' has quietly been this absolute juggernaut for the fall season," said Paul Dergarabedian, the senior media analyst for Comscore. “For that film to see an increase after six weeks is astounding.”
“Smile 2” landed in third place with $6.8 million, helping to push its worldwide total to $109.7 million.
The time-hopping “Here,” a graphic novel that was adapted by “Forrest Gump” screenwriter Eric Roth, was financed by Miramax and distributed by Sony’s TriStar. With a fixed position camera, it takes audiences through the years in one living room. Critics were not on board: In aggregate it has a lousy 36% on Rotten Tomatoes.
“It was a slow weekend anyway, but it didn’t resonate in a way that many thought it might," Dergarabedian said. "There are a lot of films out there for the audience that ‘Here’ was chasing."
Despite playing in almost 1,000 more locations, “Here” came in behind Focus Features' papal thriller “Conclave,” which earned $5.3 million. Playing in 1,796 theaters, “Conclave” dropped only 20% from its debut last weekend and has made $15.2 million so far. Two Indian films also cracked the top 10 in their debuts, “Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3” and “Singham Again.”
Overall box office continues to lag behind 2023 by almost 12%. But holiday moviegoing will likely give the industry an end-of-year boost with titles like “Gladiator II” and “Wicked” on the way.
“In a couple of weeks, it’ll get a lot more competitive,” Dergarabedian said.
Jesse Eisenberg’s film “A Real Pain,” a comedic drama about cousins on a Holocaust tour in Poland, launched in four theaters this weekend in New York and Los Angeles. It made an estimated $240,000, or $60,000 per screen, which is among the top three highest per theater averages of the year. Searchlight Pictures will be expanding the well-reviewed film nationwide in the coming weeks, going wide on Nov. 15 to over 800 theaters.
Box office charts don’t always paint a full picture of the moviegoing landscape, however. This weekend several relatively high-profile films playing in theaters did not report full grosses for various reasons, including the Clint Eastwood film “Juror #2,” Steve McQueen’s WWII film “Blitz” and the Cannes darling “Emilia Pérez.” Netflix, which is handling “Emilia Pérez,” never reports box office. Apple Original Films is following suit with “Blitz,” a likely awards contender, which is in theaters before hitting Apple TV+ on Nov. 22.
“Juror No. 2” is a Warner Bros. release, and a well-reviewed one at that. The film directed by Eastwood stars Nicholas Hoult as a juror on a murder case who faces a big moral dilemma. Domestic ticket sales were withheld. The studio did say that it earned $5 million from international showings, where it played on 1,348 screens.
Even major studios withhold box office numbers occasionally. Earlier this year, Disney did not report on the Daisy Ridley movie “Young Woman and the Sea.” Results were most notably withheld during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"It’s really up to the distributors," Dergarabedian said. “Often times the reason that certain movies may not be reported is that there’s a chance that the quality of the movie will be conflated with the box office number.”



'Amazing' AI De-Ages Tom Hanks in New Film 'Here'

Tom Hanks. (AP)
Tom Hanks. (AP)
TT

'Amazing' AI De-Ages Tom Hanks in New Film 'Here'

Tom Hanks. (AP)
Tom Hanks. (AP)

Tom Hanks has praised the "amazing" use of artificial intelligence to de-age him "in real time" on the set of new movie "Here," even as he accepted that the technology is causing huge concern in Hollywood.
"Here," out in theaters Friday, stars Hanks and Robin Wright as a couple striving to keep their family together through births, marriages, divorces and deaths, across multiple decades and even generations, said AFP.
Hanks portrays his character from an idealistic teen, through various stages of youth and middle age, to a frail, elderly man.
But rather than just relying on makeup, filmmakers teamed up with AI studio Metaphysic on a tool called Metaphysic Live, to rejuvenate and "age up" the actors.
The technology worked so fast that Hanks was able to immediately watch his "deep-faked" performance after each scene.
"The thing that is amazing about it is it happened in real time," said Hanks.
"We did not have to wait for eight months of post-production. There were two monitors on the set. One was the actual feed from the lens, and the other was just a nanosecond slower, of us 'deep-faked.'
"So we could see ourselves in real time, right then and there."
The rapidly increasing use of AI in films including "Here" has triggered vast concern in Hollywood, where actors last year went on strike over, among other things, the threat they believe the technology poses to their jobs and industry.
Hanks acknowledged those fears during a panel discussion with director Robert Zemeckis at last weekend's AFI Fest in Hollywood, saying a "lot of people" were worried about how it will be used.
"They took 8 million images of us from the web. They scraped the web for photos of us in every era that we've ever been -- every event we've filmed, every movie still, every family photo that might have existed anywhere," Hanks explained.
"And they put that into the box -- what is it, 'deepfake technology,' whatever you want to call it."
'Cinematic'
The use of AI is not the only unusual technological feat in "Here."
The film is entirely shot from one static camera, positioned for the most part in the corner of a suburban US home's living room.
Viewers occasionally see glimpses of the same geographic space before the house was built, as the action hops back and forth to colonial and pre-colonial times -- or even earlier.
"Here" is based on a graphic novel by Richard McGuire, which uses the same concept.
"It had to be true to the style of the book, and that's why it looks the way it does," Zemeckis told AFP.
"It worked in levels that I didn't expect. It's got a real powerful intimacy to it, and in a wonderful way, it's very cinematic."
But the film's use of AI has drawn the most attention.
'Very serious subject'
AI was also at the heart of a very different film at AFI Fest -- "Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl," the latest film for the beloved British stop-motion characters.
When Wallace constructs a "smart gnome" to take care of chores, his faithful pooch Gromit immediately sniffs danger.
Once Feathers McGraw -- the nefarious penguin introduced to audiences in 1993 short film "The Wrong Trousers" -- gets involved, the technology takes a sinister turn.
AI becomes "the wedge between Wallace and Gromit," explained co-director Merlin Crossingham.
"It is a very light touch, although it's a very serious subject," he said.
If "we can trigger some more intellectual conversation from our silly adventure with Wallace and Gromit, then that can't be a bad thing."
The film itself did not use AI.
"We don't and we wouldn't," said Crossingham, earning hearty applause from the Hollywood crowd.
"Vengeance Most Fowl" will be broadcast on Christmas Day in the United Kingdom and Ireland, before airing globally on Netflix from January 3.