International Community Divided on Niger Coup Response

 Niger's junta supporters take part in a demonstration in front of a French army base in Niamey, Niger, August 11, 2023. (Reuters)
Niger's junta supporters take part in a demonstration in front of a French army base in Niamey, Niger, August 11, 2023. (Reuters)
TT
20

International Community Divided on Niger Coup Response

 Niger's junta supporters take part in a demonstration in front of a French army base in Niamey, Niger, August 11, 2023. (Reuters)
Niger's junta supporters take part in a demonstration in front of a French army base in Niamey, Niger, August 11, 2023. (Reuters)

More than three weeks after a military coup in Niger forced out a democratically elected government, the international community appears hopelessly divided on how to handle the new status quo, with fault lines appearing even among Western allies, analysts say.

Former colonial master France remains steadfastly opposed to the new regime in Niamey while Russia, predictably, sees the coup as a chance to boost its influence, with everyone else somewhere in between.

France immediately condemned the coup, and let it be known that it might support African armed action to re-instate Mohamed Bazoum as president.

But Niger's neighbors, who would most likely take charge of military intervention, let their own ultimatum addressed to the new regime pass without sending in troops.

West African military chiefs started a two-day meeting in Ghana on Thursday to discuss a possible armed intervention after the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) agreed to activate a "standby force to restore constitutional order" in Niger, but did not say when, or even whether, it would be used.

'Calamitous consequences'

One ECOWAS member, Cape Verde, has come out strongly against the use of force, with President Jose Maria Neves saying efforts to restore constitutional order should not "under any circumstances include military intervention or armed conflict".

A view shared by Solomon Dersso, managing director at the Amani Africa research group, who said armed intervention could trigger "calamitous consequences", including the entire region being engulfed in war.

Instead of acting as a deterrent, sanctions and the threat of military action had given the new government in Niamey ammunition to stir nationalist sentiment among Nigeriens "and ride on their anti-neo-colonial sentiments", Dersso wrote.

Analysts said military action would need support from the African Union, a pan-African body, which has been silent since meeting on the Niger question on Monday, a sign of internal divisions.

Mali and Burkina Faso, where military governments took over in coups in recent years, have expressed their support for the new government in Niamey.

'Confused, muddled'

Subtle but important differences have meanwhile emerged between the two western powers most involved in Niger, the United States and France.

Washington keeps a permanent force of 1,100 soldiers in Niger to fight extremists linked to Al-Qaeda and the ISIS group, and "we don't want to see that partnership go", said Sabrina Singh, a spokeswoman for the Defense Department in Washington.

"We have invested hundreds of millions of dollars into bases there, trained with the military there, we really want to see a peaceful resolution," Singh said.

Officially, it is US policy to abstain from military cooperation with governments coming to power through a coup.

"But that's a flexible definition," said Colin Clarke, director of research at the Soufan Group consultancy.

"The American position is confused, muddled," Clarke told AFP.

France, which keeps 1,500 troops in Niger for the battle against extremists with the help of local soldiers, has meanwhile stuck to its inflexible position towards the West African country's new rulers.

President Emmanuel Macron's government last week gave unconditional support to ECOWAS when the military option was still favored by the organization.

"Our position is to support ECOWAS," a French diplomatic source told AFP.

"It is up to ECOWAS to take its decision, either in favor of sanctions, or in favor of a military intervention threat," the source said.

European Union heavyweight Germany on Thursday called on the EU to impose sanctions "against the putschists".

'Very transparent'

Analysts said Russia is a beneficiary of western divisions, with the Wagner paramilitary group -- loyal to Moscow despite cooler ties with the Kremlin since a short-lived rebellion in June -- waiting in the wings.

Wagner is active in the Central African Republic, in Sudan, in Mali despite Bamako's denials, and is looking for a role in Burkina Faso.

Niger, with its wealth of natural resources, looks an attractive target for the group.

"Wagner is very transparent about what they are there for," Clarke said. "They are not going to lecture the regime on human rights. They are here to get access to resources and in return they will provide political security."

The Sahel region's insurgents, meanwhile, continue to strike. On Tuesday 17 Niger soldiers were killed by suspected extremists near the western border with Burkina Faso "in a terrorist ambush", the defense ministry said.



Report: Israel Hit Syrian Bases Scoped by Türkiye, Hinting at Regional Showdown

 Debris is scattered at the site of an Israeli strike on a military airbase near Hama, Syria, Thursday, April 3, 2025. (AP)
Debris is scattered at the site of an Israeli strike on a military airbase near Hama, Syria, Thursday, April 3, 2025. (AP)
TT
20

Report: Israel Hit Syrian Bases Scoped by Türkiye, Hinting at Regional Showdown

 Debris is scattered at the site of an Israeli strike on a military airbase near Hama, Syria, Thursday, April 3, 2025. (AP)
Debris is scattered at the site of an Israeli strike on a military airbase near Hama, Syria, Thursday, April 3, 2025. (AP)

Türkiye scoped out at least three air bases in Syria where it could deploy forces as part of a planned joint defense pact before Israel hit the sites with air strikes this week, four people familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The bombardment signals the risks of a deepening rift between two powerful regional militaries over Syria, where opposition factions have installed a new government after toppling former leader Bashar al-Assad in December.

The Israeli strikes on the three sites Türkiye was assessing, including a heavy barrage on Wednesday night, came despite Ankara's efforts to reassure Washington that a deeper military presence in Syria was not intended to threaten Israel.

The factions replacing Assad have alarmed Israel, which is wary of their presence on its border and has lobbied the United States to curb Türkiye’s growing influence in the country.

Ankara, a longtime backer of opposition to Assad, is positioning to play a major role in the remade Syria, including with a possible joint defense pact that could see new Turkish bases in central Syria and use of Syria's airspace.

In preparation, Turkish military teams in recent weeks visited the T4 and Palmyra air bases in Syria's Homs province and the main airport in Hama province, according to a regional intelligence official, two Syrian military sources and another Syrian source familiar with the matter.

The sources spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the visits, which have not been previously reported.

Turkish teams evaluated the state of the runways, hangars and other infrastructure at the bases, the regional intelligence official said.

Another planned visit to T4 and Palmyra on March 25 was cancelled after Israel struck both bases just hours beforehand, according to the regional intelligence official and the two Syrian military sources.

Strikes at T4 "destroyed the runway, tower, hangars and the planes that were grounded. It was a tough message that Israel won't accept the expanded Turkish presence," said the intelligence official, who reviewed photographs of the damage.

"T4 is totally unusable now," said a fourth Syrian source, who is close to Türkiye.

When asked about the visits, a Turkish defense ministry official said: "Reports and posts regarding developments in Syria - whether real or alleged - that do not originate from official authorities should not be taken into consideration, as they lack credibility and may be misleading."

A spokesperson for Syria's defense ministry declined to comment.

Türkiye’s foreign ministry on Thursday called Israel "the greatest threat to regional security". On Friday, Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan told Reuters Türkiye wanted no confrontation with Israel in Syria.

HEAVY STRIKES

In the four months since Assad was toppled, Israel has seized ground in southwest Syria, made overtures to the Druze minority, and struck much of the Syrian military's heavy weapons and equipment. Wednesday's strikes were some of the most intense yet.

Syria's foreign ministry said Israel struck five separate areas within a 30-minute window, resulting in the near-total destruction of the Hama base and wounding dozens of civilians and soldiers.

Israel said it hit the T4 air base and other military capabilities at air bases in Hama and Homs provinces, as well as military infrastructure in the Damascus area.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz called the air strikes a warning that "we will not allow the security of the State of Israel to be harmed". Foreign Minister Gideon Saar accused Ankara of seeking a "Turkish protectorate" in Syria.

Noa Lazimi, a specialist in Middle East politics at Bar-Ilan University, said Israel was concerned that Türkiye could establish Russian anti-aircraft systems and drones at T4.

"The base would enable Türkiye to establish air superiority in this area, and this poses a serious concern for Israel because it undermines its operational freedom in the region," she said.

'IDEOLOGICAL COLLISION COURSE'

Türkiye has tried to reassure the US that it wants to work towards a stable Syria.

Foreign Minister Fidan told US officials in Washington last month that Syrian interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa would not pose a threat to neighbors, according to a senior regional diplomat close to Türkiye and a source in Washington briefed on the meetings.

Fidan and other Turkish officials had earlier told Sharaa that Ankara was carefully calibrating its moves towards a defense pact so as not to irk Washington, one of the Syrian military sources said.

" Türkiye, not Israel, would pay the highest price among regional states were there to be failure or destabilization in Syria, including with refugees and security," an official in Türkiye’s ruling AK Party told Reuters.

Soner Cagaptay, director of the Turkish Research Program at the Washington Institute think tank, said Türkiye and Israel were on an "ideological collision course" but could avoid military escalation through mediation with Washington.