Israelis Forgive Military for Failures, but Trust in Netanyahu Plummets to 18%

A Palestinian carries a boy, treated at the hospital for head injury, after an Israeli airstrike. (AFP)
A Palestinian carries a boy, treated at the hospital for head injury, after an Israeli airstrike. (AFP)
TT
20

Israelis Forgive Military for Failures, but Trust in Netanyahu Plummets to 18%

A Palestinian carries a boy, treated at the hospital for head injury, after an Israeli airstrike. (AFP)
A Palestinian carries a boy, treated at the hospital for head injury, after an Israeli airstrike. (AFP)

The Israel Democracy Institute released the findings of a recent poll, showing that the Israeli public is forgiving of the military's performance during the Oct. 7 attack by Hamas.

The military had apologized to Israelis for its security failures, taking responsibility for them, and deciding to engage in a comprehensive war in response to Hamas.

As a result, the military’s popularity increased from 85% to 87%, while the popularity of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government decreased to 18%.

Even among right-wing voters, the government’s popularity has dwindled, dropping from 43% in June of the previous year to 31%.

The public perceives the government as a failure, lacking the courage to acknowledge its responsibilities for these shortcomings, and consequently, it is losing the trust of the people.

Despite the massive public support rallying around the military and its war plans in Gaza, voices of reason have emerged, urging the cessation of the conflict and seeking an alternative path to put an end to the ongoing strife.

Some have warned that the conflict could spill over into the region, claiming the lives of thousands of Israelis, Palestinians, and Arabs.

While these voices remain limited, consisting of a select group of writers and opinion leaders, they mark an intriguing awakening.

Renowned author and art critic Rogel Alpher penned an article in Haaretz titled: “Again, Israel Is Choosing Death.” He lamented that Israel, as usual, was marching towards sacrificing hostages to the drums of war and making yet another catastrophic choice for death.

“It’s a perfect and horrifying welding of the Holocaust and the horrors of the Nazis to Hamas and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” he wrote.

“According to the new ethos, the slaughterers are not Hamas members alone, but all of Palestinian society, in Gaza and in the Palestinian Authority,” he explained.



Israel’s Messages Behind Strikes on Beirut’s Southern Suburb

Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)
Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

Israel’s Messages Behind Strikes on Beirut’s Southern Suburb

Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)
Men stand at the scene of an Israeli strike on a building in Beirut's southern suburbs on April 1, 2025. (AFP)

Israel’s latest airstrikes on Beirut’s southern suburb, known as Dahiyeh, have moved beyond mere retaliation for rocket fire, signaling a shift in the rules of engagement. By targeting the area twice in less than a week, Tel Aviv has effectively abandoned the informal understanding that had kept the suburb off-limits since the ceasefire took effect in November.

The escalation raises questions about how Lebanon’s government and Hezbollah will respond and whether this marks the beginning of a more intense phase of conflict.

Pressure to normalize ties

Observers close to Hezbollah believe Israel’s strikes are aimed to increase pressure on Lebanon to engage in normalization talks.

Brig. Gen. Mounir Shehadeh, former Lebanese government coordinator with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), suggested that the rockets fired into Israel last Friday—which prompted the initial Israeli response—ultimately served Israeli interests.

“It was evident that these were crude, suspicious rockets, giving Israel the pretext it needed to strike deep into Lebanese territory, specifically Dahiyeh,” Shehadeh told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He pointed to Tuesday’s assassination of a Hezbollah member in the Dahiyeh strike, describing it as a significant escalation. “Unlike last week, there was no pretext for this attack,” he said. “This confirms that Israel’s objective is to pressure Lebanon into normalization.”

Shehadeh argued that the US and Israel are working to push Lebanon into political negotiations involving diplomats and politicians rather than military representatives.

“There are also growing efforts to force Hezbollah into making internal concessions, particularly to disarm in areas north of the Litani River,” he added.

He stressed that Israel is sending a clear message: no location in Lebanon is off-limits, and it will continue to act whenever and wherever it sees fit.

A different perspective

Retired Brig. Gen. George Nader offered a different interpretation of the escalation. He believes Israel does not need excuses to carry out its attacks, but argues that Lebanon should avoid giving it any justification.

“We have failed to implement international resolutions, particularly Resolution 1701, and we continue to insist that Hezbollah’s disarmament requires national dialogue,” Nader told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He questioned the relevance of such discussions, given that Lebanon’s previous government had already signed an agreement calling for the disarmament of armed groups and the dismantling of their military infrastructure, starting south of the Litani River.

“As long as the situation remains unchanged, we should expect Israeli violations and attacks to intensify,” he warned. He also cited explicit US warnings that Lebanon could face cuts in military aid and even sanctions if it fails to implement the agreement.

“We are at a crossroads,” Nader said. “Either Hezbollah acknowledges the shifting regional and international dynamics, helps the state assert full sovereignty over Lebanese territory, and surrenders its weapons—or Israel will continue the aggressive approach we are seeing today.”