A Year After the Surprises

Palestinians inspect a destroyed building after an Israeli air strike on Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip (dpa)
Palestinians inspect a destroyed building after an Israeli air strike on Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip (dpa)
TT

A Year After the Surprises

Palestinians inspect a destroyed building after an Israeli air strike on Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip (dpa)
Palestinians inspect a destroyed building after an Israeli air strike on Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip (dpa)

The world may have witnessed the beginning of the current round of the Palestinian-Israeli war, but it sure won't know when and how it will end.

This round of the conflict is different, marked by a series of unexpected turns.

- The first surprise: Israel

Hamas' sudden massive invasion of the settlements around the Gaza Strip took Israel by surprise during its Yom Kippur celebrations. As soon as it woke up from its almost coma-like slumber, Hamas had killed, destroyed, and taken numerous captives to Gaza.

- The second surprise: Hamas

Hamas' modest capabilities compared to its opponent's surprised me.

This time, the surprise came from the Hamas movement, not the other side. No one could have predicted this level of unforeseen success, or it could have yielded this number of spoils.

The unexpected outcome left Israel contemplating its response, ranging from a ground invasion to limited action.

- The third surprise: the US

In the world's eyes, the firm notion that the superpower's intelligence and its regional branch, Israel, possess complete knowledge of what is happening above and below the ground was shattered.

The US itself was surprised. Under the shock, there was no time to assess the situation carefully and instead seemed to have pulled the gun immediately.

Without hesitation, it ordered its giant aircraft carriers to move to the nearest location opposite Gaza and Israel. President Joe Biden quickly dispatched the Secretary of State in anticipation of his visit.

The institutions of the major state began preparing for a danger that threatened the existence of the Hebrew state and risked a comprehensive regional war, with "exposed" US interests as a target.

- Fourth surprise: The old equation no longer applies

US intuitive assessment of the Israeli military force was that a brief intervention in a few days or weeks would suffice.

Israel itself had the same assessments, and it still considers the war, especially in Gaza, to be merely a disciplinary act that results in death and destruction greater than what it lost.

Tel Aviv deluded itself that Gaza is under control and that a tight siege and some bombings are enough to silence it. It believed no small or large war didn't end with a ceasefire or a medium- or long-term truce.

Israel was maintaining a fragile truce through limited concessions, such as increasing the number of workers, expanding the fishing area, and other things that were extremely limited, effective, and cheap to the point that it settled on protecting its southern borders within an equation that included a great deal of reassurance that Gaza would not do anything.

On October 7, the two partner allies, the US and Israel, were surprised that the old equation with Hamas no longer worked.

- Fifth surprise: resistance

Israel grew accustomed to a seemingly comfortable, calm Gaza, which provided it with additional capabilities to devote itself entirely to the West Bank, its central goal.

The West Bank, and Jerusalem in its heart, represents Israel's biggest and most dangerous challenge, with its broader geography and many entrances and exits that lead to every place in Israel.

The empty and crowded settlements cover the entire West Bank from its southernmost point to its northernmost point. Gaza is different because the settlements are still there, and the settlers, estimated at hundreds of thousands, are the reservists ready to participate without the need to be called up.

The resistance in the West Bank does pose no surprise. However, Gaza posed a different story.

Surprisingly, the Israeli army was shocked by the ferocity of the resistance in Gaza, placing the generals' estimates that the war was under control from beginning to end as an unreachable target.

They are fighting over every square meter of the Strip, which, under military standards, is considered the narrowest place on Earth exposed to the greatest amount of fire, with no decisive end in sight, according to the Israeli announced goals.

Every surprise of this war brings about subsequent surprises, and all estimates drawn from previous wars are no longer of value.

- Sixth surprise: global perception

Israel was content with the narrative shared with the US, portraying the Gaza war as a fight against ISIS and what it described as its "Palestinian branch."

The story lasted a few days but later declined, faded, and is no longer debatable. Thus, the Israeli behavior appears more "ISIS-y" than a defensive war, as it claimed at the beginning.

Israel's behavior awakened the conscience of the world shaken by the destruction of Gaza and the killing of thousands of civilians, half of whom were children, without mentioning those under the rubble.

The term "Israel's self-defense" has become mere nonsense that the world does not accept.

Israel was not surprised on a propaganda and narrative level only but also on a political level, as the world unanimously agreed that getting out of this cycle meant reaching a radical political solution to the Palestinian issue after it had become certain that its liquidation was impossible. This may be the seventh surprise.

As we approach the end of the year, two possibilities emerge, one positive and the other negative.

The first is for the world to move seriously towards a two-state solution, offering a real opportunity for the establishment of a Palestinian state.

Alternatively, the world's enthusiasm may wane, relegating the two-state solution to a mere slogan that Israel can obstruct.



Iran After Trump’s Win: Calls for New Approach, Challenge to Soleimani’s ‘Killer’

An Iranian holds a copy of the Hamshahri newspaper in a street in downtown Tehran (EPA)
An Iranian holds a copy of the Hamshahri newspaper in a street in downtown Tehran (EPA)
TT

Iran After Trump’s Win: Calls for New Approach, Challenge to Soleimani’s ‘Killer’

An Iranian holds a copy of the Hamshahri newspaper in a street in downtown Tehran (EPA)
An Iranian holds a copy of the Hamshahri newspaper in a street in downtown Tehran (EPA)

The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson has said that Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election offers an opportunity for the US to reassess its “misguided policies.”

“What matters for Iran is the performance of the US administration,” said Ismail Baghai on Thursday, noting that Tehran had “bitter experiences” with past US policies.

He added that Trump’s win is a “chance to reconsider the previous wrong directions” of the US, according to the official IRNA news agency.

Iranian newspapers were divided, with some calling for Tehran to adopt a new approach, while others opposed the policies of the “architect of maximum pressure” and the “killer” of Gen. Qasem Soleimani.

On Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said the US election result was of no concern to Iran.

“It doesn't matter to us who won the US election, as our strength lies in our internal power and a great nation,” Pezeshkian said.

“We are not narrow-minded in developing relations with other countries, prioritizing ties with Islamic and neighboring nations,” he added, according to Iranian media. It was unclear if he was referring to the US, with which Iran has no diplomatic ties.

Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has banned direct talks with the US.

On Wednesday, government spokesperson Fatemeh Mahdiani downplayed the importance of the election.

“The US presidential election won’t affect us. Iran’s policies remain unchanged,” she said.

“It doesn't matter who the US president is. We’ve already planned for various scenarios, given the sanctions on Iran for over 40 years,” she added.

Last Monday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said: “We don’t place much importance on the US election or who is elected.”

Baghai, speaking at his weekly press conference on Monday, said Iran’s stance on Trump is “clear” when asked how Tehran would respond if Trump offered to negotiate.

Trump’s victory comes amid rising tensions between Israel and Iran, with direct strikes exchanged after years of indirect conflict.

Reuters speculated that Trump’s return to office would mean stricter enforcement of US oil sanctions on Iran, which were imposed in 2018 after the US left the nuclear deal.

Trump criticized President Joe Biden’s policy of not enforcing strict sanctions on Iran’s oil exports, claiming it weakened the US and emboldened Tehran to expand its nuclear program and support armed groups.

In his first term, Trump reimposed sanctions after withdrawing from the 2015 nuclear deal, which had limited Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for economic benefits.

These sanctions hurt Iran’s oil exports, reduced government revenue, and led to unpopular measures like tax hikes, while inflation remained near 40%.

In September, Pezeshkian said Tehran was ready to resolve the nuclear issue with the West, which accuses Iran of seeking nuclear weapons.

Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but officials have hinted at possibly changing its direction.

Biden tried to revive the nuclear deal but failed to reach a new agreement. It’s unclear if Trump would pursue a similar approach.

Trump’s victory in the US presidential election dominated Iranian newspapers on Thursday morning, with the reformist Sazandegi newspaper, under the headline “Trump’s Return,” saying that no decision-makers in Iran are comfortable with Trump’s win, as it could harm the country in several ways.

The paper, aligned with former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani’s faction, predicted that Trump might increase uncertainty, tighten sanctions, block Iran’s oil exports, and destabilize the economy, which would hurt ordinary Iranians.

The paper also suggested that the situation could change if the Iranian government adjusts its approach in response to Trump’s win but criticized Iran’s decision-makers for being slow to adapt.

It acknowledged that while Iran’s actions over the past 50 years have led all US administrations to view it as an enemy, the impact of the US president can vary.

The newspaper warned that Trump’s policies could lead to a bigger budget deficit, rising inflation, and a higher exchange rate, all of which would harm various sectors of Iran’s economy.

It noted that the country’s currency stability relies on oil revenues and foreign political relations.

With ongoing regional tensions and sanctions, any drop in oil revenues and difficulty accessing global markets could worsen Iran’s economic challenges, making it harder for the government to manage its budget and financial crises.

Analysts quoted by Sazandegi said Trump’s reelection might not lead to war but could result in harsher sanctions targeting Iran’s nuclear and missile programs without military action.

They also predicted that Russia might increase its pressure on Iran, potentially pushing the country toward a “Look East” strategy.

Reformist politician Mohammad Hashemi Rafsanjani wrote in Arman Emruz that Trump, as a businessman, would likely prefer economic cooperation with Iran over military conflict.

He suggested Trump might push for trade talks with Iran, opening the market to US companies, similar to European firms before the nuclear deal.

Hashemi noted that any conflict could drive up oil and gas prices, and as a businessman, Trump would likely avoid this. Instead, he would seek to strengthen economic ties between Iran and the US.

Hashemi also pointed out that the nuclear deal brought Iran significant economic benefits, including the return of $100 billion in frozen assets.

Arman Emruz warned that Trump’s return could escalate Middle East tensions and complicate relations with China and Russia over issues like Ukraine and Taiwan.

Etemad newspaper said that during his first term, Trump tried to turn Iran from a legitimate player into a pariah state, aiming to restrict and isolate it. It added that Trump’s return now is not in Iran’s interest.

The paper called for a “different policy” toward Trump. Reformist activist and former MP Mahmoud Sadeghi said it’s too early to assess Trump’s performance, especially since he won unexpectedly.

Sadeghi pointed out that for Iranians, the key concern is how Trump’s election will affect domestic issues, recalling his role in the strike that killed Gen. Soleimani five years ago.

He warned against falling into “self-sanctions” and urged Iran to address the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) rules to fight money laundering.

On regional policy, Sadeghi stressed the need for the government to act wisely to avoid being caught in the Netanyahu-Trump rivalry. He emphasized the importance of seizing every opportunity, no matter how small.

Former MP Heshmatollah Falahatpisheh compared Trump’s return to the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan and dismissed the idea that Democrats and Republicans are the same, especially on the nuclear deal.