Hamas: Communication Network via Special Hubs, Written Messages

Tunnel for Hamas in Khan Yunis.The tunnels have communication hubs to facilitate secure communication among the movement’s leaders (AFP)
Tunnel for Hamas in Khan Yunis.The tunnels have communication hubs to facilitate secure communication among the movement’s leaders (AFP)
TT

Hamas: Communication Network via Special Hubs, Written Messages

Tunnel for Hamas in Khan Yunis.The tunnels have communication hubs to facilitate secure communication among the movement’s leaders (AFP)
Tunnel for Hamas in Khan Yunis.The tunnels have communication hubs to facilitate secure communication among the movement’s leaders (AFP)

In the thick of protracted Israeli war operations in Gaza, spanning over three months, the Hamas leadership is tackling increased scrutiny by intensifying its implementation of security measures, particularly in communication.

Hamas is maintaining heightened security for internal communications in Gaza, interactions with its armed wing (Al-Qassam Brigades), and communication with the group’s leaders abroad.

In order to uphold confidentiality, Hamas employs a covert communication system, starting with a dedicated ground network and evolving into a rudimentary method of human communication through written messages.

This comes at a time Hamas officials are compelled to engage in more stringent communication for discussions on war decisions, ceasefire proposals, and exchange deals.

Decisions on the fate of any proposal or deal lie with the Gaza leadership, leading to ongoing discreet discussions to prevent information leaks.

Hamas leaders use a unique communication system, especially with those abroad, given the frequent disruption of communications and the internet in Gaza, sources close to the group told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The system is also employed to avoid Israeli surveillance.

During the early stages of the Israeli war, Hamas relied on a ground communications network, developed by engineers from its military wing in 2009.

The technology has been periodically upgraded using equipment likely smuggled through tunnels along the Egyptian border.

Al-Qassam Brigades also installed underground switchboards connected to very old landline phones at specific points above ground. These setups are regularly checked and undergo monthly maintenance to prevent breaches.

Hamas leaders, whether in politics or the military, each have individual emergency contact points, each with a specific number for communication, sources revealed.

Israel was aware of this system and tried multiple times to breach it, including attempts to target it directly.

In an undeclared war in May 2018, Israel succeeded in detonating an explosive-rigged communication hub in Gaza, resulting in the assassination of Al-Qassam engineers.

Before and after that incident, Israel made several attempts to breach the system, including a special force infiltration in November 2018 that was discovered during a mission in Khan Yunis, leading to their extraction under fire and the loss of two members.

Despite Israeli forces targeting and destroying certain communication points, including tunnels with key communication hubs, it seems that Hamas has managed to maintain these channels.

Sources say that even though the communication network suffered damage, the leadership of the movement continued to operate through these hubs, including using them for the intense communications that led to the conclusion of a seven-day humanitarian ceasefire.

Engineers from the Al-Qassam Brigades were reportedly successful in restoring some of these hubs and activating new communication points.



Why Does Israel Insist on Hezbollah to Withdraw North of Litani River?

Israeli tanks on the Lebanese-Israeli border (AP)
Israeli tanks on the Lebanese-Israeli border (AP)
TT

Why Does Israel Insist on Hezbollah to Withdraw North of Litani River?

Israeli tanks on the Lebanese-Israeli border (AP)
Israeli tanks on the Lebanese-Israeli border (AP)

Lebanese fears became reality early Tuesday when the Israeli military announced a “limited ground operation” in southern Lebanon against Hezbollah.

This move comes after 15 days of escalating violence, which began with the explosion of Hezbollah’s pagers and communication devices and the assassination of key leaders, culminating in the killing of Hezbollah’s Secretary-General, Hassan Nasrallah.

Israeli officials stated their intent to “do everything necessary to return northern residents” to their homes and to use “all means” to push Hezbollah “beyond the Litani River.”

These remarks are viewed as serious threats.

The issue of the Litani River gained attention again on August 11, 2006, when the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1701.

This resolution called for a complete ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel, ending the July war pitting Hezbollah against the Israeli army.

Resolution 1701 established a zone between the Blue Line, the border between Lebanon and Israel, and the Litani River in southern Lebanon, banning all armed groups and military equipment except for the Lebanese Armed Forces and UN peacekeepers (UNIFIL).

Hezbollah initially accepted the resolution but later violated it by fully redeploying in southern Lebanon.

Israel has also repeatedly breached the resolution, failing to withdraw from the occupied Lebanese territories of Shebaa Farms and Kfar Shouba Hills.

It has conducted numerous air violations and recently bombarded southern villages, displacing over a million Lebanese residents.

Retired military analyst Brig. Gen. Saeed Kozah told Asharq Al-Awsat that

Israel aims to push Hezbollah fighters beyond the Litani River, believing this would reduce the threat by about 40 kilometers from its settlements.

Meanwhile, as Israel ramped up its military actions against Lebanon, air raid sirens continued to sound in Israeli settlements near the border.

This followed Hezbollah’s launch of dozens of rockets at military sites and settlements, including the city of Haifa.

The area of southern Lebanon around the Litani River covers about 850 square kilometers and is home to around 200,000 residents, 75% of whom are Shiite.

Observers believe this is a key reason why Hezbollah is unwilling to withdraw from the region.

Kozah noted that Hezbollah’s refusal to retreat is tied to its desire to “declare victory,” similar to its stance after the 2006 July war, as it does not want to admit defeat.

Kozah stated that while a Hezbollah withdrawal would reduce direct ground and rocket attacks, it would not eliminate the risk of missiles launched from the Bekaa Valley and other parts of Lebanon.

He emphasized that Hezbollah’s ballistic missiles could be fired from various locations, including Syria.