Iraq: Al-Hashimi’s Killer Is Released Due to ‘Lack of Evidence’

Prominent researcher and security expert Hisham al-Hashimi. (X platform)
Prominent researcher and security expert Hisham al-Hashimi. (X platform)
TT
20

Iraq: Al-Hashimi’s Killer Is Released Due to ‘Lack of Evidence’

Prominent researcher and security expert Hisham al-Hashimi. (X platform)
Prominent researcher and security expert Hisham al-Hashimi. (X platform)

The Iraqi judiciary acquitted and released the murderer of prominent researcher and security expert Hisham al-Hashimi last week.

Spokeswoman for the judiciary Sinan Ghanem told Asharq Al-Awsat that a court had acquitted Ahmed Hamdawi al-Kinani due to a “lack of evidence.”

The court’s decision came after the case was reopened last Wednesday, and al-Kinani was released Sunday, said an official with one of the country's Iran-backed militias.

Al-Kinani, accused of murdering al-Hashimi, was convicted on terrorism charges and sentenced to death by a criminal court last May, Iraq’s Supreme Judicial Council reported. The case later moved to an appeals court for further review.

Al-Hashimi, 47, was fatally shot outside his Baghdad home by motorcycle-riding assailants in July 2020, following threats from Iran-backed militias. He was on his way home after conducting a TV interview in which he criticized the armed groups’ attacks on diplomatic missions.

Renowned for his expertise on the ISIS group, al-Hashimi had advised the US-led coalition and became a vocal critic of Iran-backed militias after the defeat of the ISIS group in December 2017. He had reported multiple threats from these groups before his death.

A judicial source told Asharq Al-Awsat that al-Kinani denied before the appeals judge ever committing the crime.

Iraqi security authorities had released al-Kinani's confessions on July 16, 2020, ten days after the crime took place.

He confessed to having plotted and carried out the crime along with several other people who had monitored al-Hashimi's movements.

Al-Hashimi was parking his car after returning from a television interview when a motorist got off his motorcycle, walked towards him and shot him dead.

In a video confession, al-Kinani said he drew his police-issued gun and killed al-Hashimi in front of his house.

The security authorities released photos of the weapon and its registration number, as well as the bullet that killed al-Hashimi.

Activists questioned how the authorities could have released al-Kinani while they have the murder weapon and his verified confessions.

An Iraqi lawyer told Asharq Al-Awsat that appeals courts do not consider videos as enough evidence for conviction. They need something tangible like a confession and witnesses to confirm a ruling.

Judicial authorities usually release statements to the media about their ruling a week after they are made, but they did not in the case of al-Kinani's acquittal.

Conviction to acquittal

How did we get here? Al-Hashimi was known for his expertise in extremist groups and has helped government authorities dismantle ISIS’ structure during the liberation battles.

Many of his friends believe that his criticism of pro-Iran armed factions in the months ahead of his killing sealed his fate.

Extremist supporters of ISIS and backers of the Shiite factions celebrated his murder.

Al-Kinani's case started with arrest, his death sentence in absentia, an appeal against the ruling, followed by a retrial and culminating in his acquittal.

Legal experts believe that a court decision in summer 2023 to annul a committee formed by former Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi that was dedicated to pursuing “extraordinary crimes” was a turning point in al-Kinani's case.

The committee was headed by Ahmed Abou Ragheef and was tasked with carrying out arrests against suspects involved in corruption and “major” cases, including al-Hashimi's.

The committee carried out a wave of arrests against officials accused of corruption, drawing a wave of criticism among political circles.

The committee had referred al-Kinani's case to the central court in al-Rasafa, which then sentenced him to death in absentia in May 2023.

On July 31, the Federal Court of Cassation, headed by Faiq Zeidan, overruled the death sentence and returned the case to the Rasafa court so that it could go ahead with the investigation procedures “according to laws and regulations.”

Following that, al-Kinani did not appear at any of the ensuing trials, revealed trusted sources. Whether he was even held in prison or not was a mystery. Several rumors circulated that he had escaped or was smuggled out. None of the claims could be verified.

Several politicians and journalists have said that al-Kinani had “disappeared completely” since October 2022 which was when the pro-Iran Coordination Framework formed the current government headed by Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani.

The Court of Cassation’s ruling returned al-Kinani's case back to square one, leading to his acquittal due to a lack of evidence.

An Iraqi judicial source said the acquittal does not necessarily mean that the case will be completely shut. The ruling against al-Kinani or others can be appealed within two years if new evidence in the case emerges.

Back to work

Users on Facebook revealed that the al-Kinana tribe celebrated al-Kinani's release. News then emerged that he had returned to his government job “as usual”.

A security source told Asharq Al-Awsat that al-Kinani resumed his work at the Interior Ministry. Another source confirmed that he returned to the engineering directorate there.

Officials at the Ministry did not reply to Asharq Al-Awsat when asked about whether al-Kinani had returned to his post. An Iraqi officer said however, that it was normal for an employee to return after being acquitted.

Born in 1985, al-Kinani joined the police in 2007. He graduated from Amman, Jordan where Iraq was sending its security forces recruits as a safety precaution because the Iraqi training centers were targets of attacks at the time.

Al-Hashimi's family

Asharq Al-Awsat attempted to contact al-Hashimi's family after al-Kinani's release. A close associate of the family told Asharq Al-Awsat that it would rather stay away from the spotlight.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he said the security and judicial authorities had informed the family of the acquittal and asked them if they would want to take a legal position in the case, but they refused out of fear of reprisals.

He denied that the family had agreed to a financial settlement in the case and said it objected to how the case has been handled.

It would now like to dedicate itself to raising al-Hashimi children and avoid a confrontation with the party that plotted and carried out his murder, continued the source.

A member of the State Administration Coalition told Asharq Al-Awsat that the concerned Shiite political forces do not expect the public to react angrily to al-Kinani's release.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, he explained that the forces in power have succeeded in recent months in “neutralizing all sources of concern in the Iraqi street.”

Independent MP Sajjad Salem told Asharq Al-Awsat that this is the fourth case in which a killer is acquitted of a crime whose victims have been protesters, activists and researchers.

The forces in power have succeeded in completely defusing these cases, he stressed.

He revealed that he has submitted a draft law to try the killers and bring justice to the families of the victims. He had approached the government over the issue, but he ruled out the possibility of a breakthrough.

He said the Coordination Framework has managed to consolidate its power firmly in state institutions, leaving little room for any breakthrough in the future.



Career Diplomat Becomes the Face of Trump’s ‘America First’ Agenda at the UN

US Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea (C), addresses a UN Security Council meeting called following a recent missile strike by Russia on a residential area in Ukraine, at the United Nations headquarters in New York, New York, USA, 08 April 2025. (EPA)
US Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea (C), addresses a UN Security Council meeting called following a recent missile strike by Russia on a residential area in Ukraine, at the United Nations headquarters in New York, New York, USA, 08 April 2025. (EPA)
TT
20

Career Diplomat Becomes the Face of Trump’s ‘America First’ Agenda at the UN

US Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea (C), addresses a UN Security Council meeting called following a recent missile strike by Russia on a residential area in Ukraine, at the United Nations headquarters in New York, New York, USA, 08 April 2025. (EPA)
US Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea (C), addresses a UN Security Council meeting called following a recent missile strike by Russia on a residential area in Ukraine, at the United Nations headquarters in New York, New York, USA, 08 April 2025. (EPA)

The highest-ranking US representative now at the United Nations told Congress two years ago that Russia's invasion of Ukraine was "unprovoked" and "unjustified," urging UN members to condemn Moscow’s aggression and demand an end to the war.

In February, it was the same career diplomat, Dorothy Shea, who voiced the Trump administration's extraordinary decision to split with European allies and refuse to back a UN resolution blaming Russia for its invasion on the third anniversary of the war.

While it is typical for diplomats to stay on as US presidents — and their political parties — change, Shea's interim role has unexpectedly made her a face of the stunning US transition on the world stage, with President Donald Trump's "America First" approach increasingly upending the post-World War II international order.

Shea will be in place longer than expected after Trump's unusual decision last month to withdraw his nominee for UN ambassador, Rep. Elise Stefanik, from consideration because of a slim Republican House majority.

"I would say (Shea’s) position is unique. It is probably particularly unique in that because of the extraordinary change, not just from one administration to another, but really an era of US foreign policy, even when there were nuanced differences," said Phillip Reeker, the former acting assistant secretary of state for Europe. "The change in the vote that took place at the UN on the Russia-Ukraine war was really an inflection point in US policy."

A UN vote changes US messaging on Ukraine

On Feb. 24, the US joined Russia in voting against a European-backed Ukrainian resolution demanding an immediate withdrawal of Moscow's forces. A dueling US resolution noted "the tragic loss of life" and called for "a swift end to the conflict," but it didn't mention Moscow’s aggression as the Trump administration opened negotiations with Russia on a ceasefire.

"Continuing to engage in rhetorical rivalries in New York may make diplomats feel vindicated, but it will not save souls on the battlefield," Shea, 59, said at the time. "Let us prove to ourselves and to our citizens that we can come together and agree on the most basic principles. Let us show one another that the bold vision of peace that once pulled us out of hell can prevail."

The message was a shocking retreat for the US in the 193-member UN General Assembly, whose resolutions are not legally binding but are seen as a barometer of world opinion. It also reinforced the fears of some allies about what a second Trump presidency could mean for longstanding transatlantic partnerships — and whether the US could remain a bulwark against aggressors like Russia.

For Shea, it was another day at work. She has spent the last 30-plus years serving as a diplomat under both Republican and Democratic presidents — from Bill Clinton to Trump — carrying out their policies even if they were a departure from longstanding US positions.

"I don’t know what her personal views are on things. But administrations change, policies change. And your job as a diplomat is to advocate for those policies," said a former colleague and deputy US ambassador, Robert Wood, who recently retired.

The US mission to the UN declined to comment. The State Department did not immediately respond to an Associated Press request for comment.

The roots of a diplomat

Shea's work has included stints in South Africa, where she witnessed Nelson Mandela become the first democratically elected president, and Israel, where she worked on the Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

Shea grew up in the suburbs of Washington — her father a World War II veteran and her mother active in the local Japanese American friendship society. The experience of Japanese exchange students staying with her family over several summers and wanting to understand world events propelled her into international relations at the University of Virginia. After graduation, she scored a job offer with the US Foreign Service.

She worked her way up and in 2019 was tapped to be Trump's ambassador to Lebanon, where the soft-spoken diplomat made headlines for her criticism of the Hezbollah group. A Lebanese judge banned local and foreign media outlets from interviewing Shea for a year, saying her criticism of Hezbollah was seditious and a threat to social peace.

In 2023, Biden nominated Shea to become No. 2 at the UN.

The top US role at the UN — for now

It is unclear when Shea will hand off to a Senate-confirmed political appointee. Stefanik went through a confirmation hearing, but her nomination was pulled last month because her vote to advance Trump's agenda remains crucial to Republicans in the House. The GOP congresswoman was the fourth Trump nominee not to make it through the confirmation process.

Trump has made no mention of whom he would nominate to replace Stefanik and fill his last remaining Cabinet seat. Until then, Shea is at the helm at a critical moment for US foreign policy, selling big changes to dealing with both allies and adversaries and defending the administration's slashing of foreign assistance.

The White House recently proposed additional drastic cuts to the State Department, which would include eliminating funding for nearly all international organizations, such as the UN.

The proposal is highly preliminary but reflects the administration's isolationist view, which, along with funding uncertainties, poses a major challenge to the mandate and work of the UN.