Seven Arab Countries Struggle with Power Cuts as Renewable Energy Is Seen as a Solution

A view of Cairo during a power cut. (Reuters)
A view of Cairo during a power cut. (Reuters)
TT

Seven Arab Countries Struggle with Power Cuts as Renewable Energy Is Seen as a Solution

A view of Cairo during a power cut. (Reuters)
A view of Cairo during a power cut. (Reuters)

Seven Arab countries are struggling with frequent power cuts. The reasons for the inability to meet local demand for electricity may vary from one country to the other, but the people and economies are suffering as a result. The power cuts take on a new dimension during the summer, with people languishing in soaring temperatures when they are unable to cool off with air conditioning.

The power cuts are most severe in Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Sudan and Kuwait and people have resorted to renewable energy as an alternative, which ends up eating into their savings.

Egypt

Egypt’s electricity shortages have in recent months turned into a real crisis. The government has tried to ease the crisis by only cutting power by around two to three hours a day. When the crisis intensified, the Egyptian Electricity Holding Company introduced a schedule for the cuts so that the people may organize their daily affairs around them.

The government recently announced that it would implement a plan to address technical malfunctions as part of a pledge to resolve the electricity shortage.

Prime Minister Mustafa Madbouly had said power consumption had increased to new levels in 2024. Egypt uses around 37.5 megawatts per day, a 12 percent increase from 2023. He did not mention the impact of the construction of new cities on demand.

He said 3 to 4 megawatts were needed to plug the gap and meet daily needs. “They will be provided through new and renewable energy,” he revealed, saying Egypt was cooperating with the United Arab Emirates to that end.

Only 12 percent of power generated in Egypt comes from renewable energy.

A student studies for high school exams at an Alexandria library during a power cut. (EPA)

Impact on crops

The power shortage is having an indirect impact on crops.

A soybean farmer spoke to Asharq Al-Awsat about a shortage in fertilizer for his crops that can be traced to the electricity crisis.

Fertilizer companies in Egypt were forced to stop operations due to the power cuts. The Misr Fertilizers Production Company (MOPCO) announced in July that it was halting operations at its three companies due to a lack of gas supplies.

The state electricity company was forced to use the gas, which would normally have been allotted to MOPCO and others, to operate its own power stations.

Other fertilizer companies have also suffered from the same problem.

Egypt is a major exporter of fertilizer, ranking sixth in the world.

The drop in production has led to the emergence of a black market where the product is sold at exploitative prices. Farmers are forced to turn to the black market, even while incurring losses, just so their crops don’t go to waste.

The rise in the cost of fertilizer has also led to a hike in prices of food, which in turn feeds inflation, which is a global problem.

Diesel-operated private generators are seen in Beirut. (AP)

Darkness in Beirut

In Lebanon, frequent power cuts, which can last a whole 24 hours, have affected all aspects of life, including education.

One citizen, Hanadi al-Hajj, complained to Asharq Al-Awsat about how the power cuts meant children studying online were unable to use their computers because they had no electricity.

She said: “The power cuts forced us to install solar panels.” She added, however, that she can’t rely on the panels during the winter because of a lack of sunlight, so she also has to turn to electricity provided by private generators, which is eating away at her savings.

At the beginning of the year, the state power company, Electricite du Liban, was able to provide around six to ten hours of electricity per day depending on the region, an increase from one to two hours previously.

Boiling temperatures in Iraq

On July 14, protests broke out in the Iraqi province of al-Diwaniyah over the “complete lack of electricity” even as the temperatures soared to boiling, said Ahmed Hussein, who took part in the rallies.

Hussein, a blacksmith, told Asharq Al-Awsat that his work relies on electricity. “A job, which would normally take three hours of work, can now take three days or more” because of the power cuts, he explained, saying his income is suffering as a result.

“How can a person live without electricity in a country where temperatures reach boiling degrees. I come from the country of oil. How is possible that we are suffering like this?” he asked incredulously.

Oil- and gas- rich Iraq produces 26,000 megawatts of electricity, while it needs 35,000 to meet local demand.

The irony is that Lebanon relies on fuel from Iraq to address its electricity problem, while Iraq itself can’t fix its own crisis.

The power cuts are attributed to deteriorating infrastructure at electricity plants and a shortage in fuel.

Iraq boasts four times the gas reserves as Egypt, but it produces no more than a tenth of what Egypt does. So, it relies on gas imports from Iran to plug demand.

GDP and electricity

In Yemen, power cuts can last around 12 hours a day, 10 in Iraq, 10 to 14 in Sudan, 12 to 20 in Lebanon, 10 to 20 in Syria, three in Egypt and two to three in Kuwait.

Electricity is the main mover of growth and a significant element in production. Yemeni economic expert Mustafa Nasr noted that Arab countries suffering from power cuts, have also witnessed a drop in their GDP.

“Electricity really is part of national security,” he told Asharq Al-Awsat.

He explained how a three-hour power cut in Egypt leads to a halt in industrial and electronic services, meaning the economy is losing around 90 hours of production a month. Prolonged shortages throughout a year could total over 1,000 hours, or around 45 days of the year.

This means the economy had come to a halt for 45 days, on top of the country’s national holidays, which in Egypt amount to 22.

Egypt’s GDP in 2023 reached around 396 billion dollars, Iraq 251 billion, Kuwait 162 billion and Yemen 21 billion in 2018, which is the latest figure from the World Bank.

Electrical cables are seen in Baghdad. (AFP)

Temperature and electricity

Ahmed al-Sayyed, an economics and finance professor, said the recent electricity problems can also be attributed to rising temperatures.

In remarks to Asharq Al-Awsat, he said studies have shown that 2024 will likely be the hottest on record.

The infrastructure and production capacity differs from country to country and how they are impacted by rising temperatures, he added.

The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) seasonal forecast service showed that July 22, 2024, was the hottest day ever recorded so far.

Temperatures soared to new highs in cities in Japan, Indonesia and China in August, while countries in the Arab Gulf and other Arab countries boiled in heat that reached over 60 degrees. Cities in Europe also simmered at 45 degrees and sometimes more.

Along with rising temperatures, director of economic research at an Arab center, Mohammed Youssef said resolving power cuts must be approached from three angles.

The first lies in ability, like chronic inability to produce enough power to meet demand. The second lies in the weakness of networks that is preventing the electricity from reaching certain regions. The third lies in regulating production in areas receiving power, he told Asharq Al-Awsat from Abu Dhabi.

Hafez Salmawy, energy sector aide to several Arab countries, said the electricity crisis in Egypt lies in a lack of fuel, which in turn was caused by a shortage in dollars. Once foreign currency is available, the problem will be solved. The same applies to Kuwait.

Syria and Yemen, however, face a different, much more difficult situation because of the damage to the electricity network and impact of sanctions on the economy. The problems there are therefore political, he explained.

Oil-rich Libya is also suffering from political problems that are preventing it from solving its power problems. Iraq, which has the finances, is suffering from run down networks and a low production capacity.

Yemenis sort electrical cable lines to connect power to their homes. (EPA)

Same solutions

Despite the different reasons for the power cuts in each country, the crises all fall under energy security because they are affecting the people and threatening overall economies.

Ali al-Rumyan, an international energy expert, said energy security for any country means a stable energy sector that allows for sustainable investments and long-term plans. This means providing the necessary resources and allowing power to reach everyone, whether this power is electric, solar, gas, solar, wind or hydrogenic.

Arab and Gulf countries must focus more on providing energy security, especially given climate change and rising global temperatures, he urged.

Solutions to the power crises lie in establishing a strategic reserve of fuel to buy the product when prices drop, said Salmawy. Energy sector debts must also be paid to encourage investment.

Renewable energy must also be incorporated more into the local energy mix, he added.

Sayyed suggested drafting plans for the early detection of crises, which aren’t difficult to come up with given data on climate change.

Dargham Mohammed Ali, an economic expert from Iraq, said renewable energy, especially solar energy, should be seen as an effective solution in Arab countries given their climate.

Mohammed Youssef, the economic expert, said Yemen should forge international partnerships that would provide it with grants and aid to its electricity sector. It can also benefit from technical and financial support from the World Bank.

Networks must also be extended to reach all rural and urban residential areas, he added.



Why Greenland Is Strategically Important to Arctic Security

Houses covered by snow are seen on the coast of a sea inlet of Nuuk, Greenland, on March 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka, File)
Houses covered by snow are seen on the coast of a sea inlet of Nuuk, Greenland, on March 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka, File)
TT

Why Greenland Is Strategically Important to Arctic Security

Houses covered by snow are seen on the coast of a sea inlet of Nuuk, Greenland, on March 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka, File)
Houses covered by snow are seen on the coast of a sea inlet of Nuuk, Greenland, on March 7, 2025. (AP Photo/Evgeniy Maloletka, File)

Location, location, location: Greenland’s position above the Arctic Circle makes the world’s largest island a key part of security strategy.

Increasing international tensions, global warming and the changing world economy have put Greenland at the heart of the debate over global trade and security, and US President Donald Trump wants to make sure his country controls the mineral-rich island that guards the Arctic and North Atlantic approaches to North America.

Greenland is a self-governing territory of Denmark, a longtime US ally that has rejected Trump’s overtures. Greenland’s own government also opposes US designs on the island, saying the people of Greenland will decide their own future.

The island, 80% of which lies above the Arctic Circle, is home to about 56,000 mostly Inuit people who until now have been largely ignored by the rest of the world.

Here’s why Greenland is strategically important to Arctic security:

Greenland’s location is key

Greenland sits off the northeastern coast of Canada, with more than two-thirds of its territory lying within the Arctic Circle. That has made it crucial to the defense of North America since World War II, when the US occupied Greenland to ensure it didn’t fall into the hands of Nazi Germany and to protect crucial North Atlantic shipping lanes.

Following the Cold War, the Arctic was largely an area of international cooperation. But climate change is thinning the Arctic ice, promising to create a northwest passage for international trade and reigniting competition with Russia, China and other countries over access to the region’s mineral resources.

Security threats

In 2018, China declared itself a “near-Arctic state” in an effort to gain more influence in the region. China has also announced plans to build a “Polar Silk Road” as part of its global Belt and Road Initiative, which has created economic links with countries around the world.

Then US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo rejected China’s move, saying: “Do we want the Arctic Ocean to transform into a new South China Sea, fraught with militarization and competing territorial claims?”

Meanwhile, Russia has sought to assert its influence over wide areas of the Arctic in competition with the US, Canada, Denmark and Norway. Moscow has also sought to boost its military presence in the polar region, home to its Northern Fleet and a site where the Soviet Union tested nuclear weapons. Russian military officials have said that the site is ready for resuming the tests, if necessary.

Russia's military has been restoring old Soviet infrastructure in the Arctic and building new facilities. Since 2014, the Russian military has opened several military bases in the Arctic and worked on reconstructing airfields.

European leaders’ concerns have been heightened since Russia launched a war in Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022.

Last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin noted that Moscow is worried about NATO’s activities in the Arctic and will respond by strengthening the capability of its armed forces there. But he said that Moscow was holding the door open to broader international cooperation in the region.

US military presence

The US Department of Defense operates the remote Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, which was built after the US and Denmark signed the Defense of Greenland Treaty in 1951. It supports missile warning, missile defense and space surveillance operations for the US and NATO.

Greenland also guards part of what is known as the GIUK (Greenland, Iceland, United Kingdom) Gap, where NATO monitors Russian naval movements in the North Atlantic.

Thomas Crosbie, an associate professor of military operations at the Royal Danish Defense College, said that an American takeover wouldn't improve upon Washington’s current security strategy.

“The United States will gain no advantage if its flag is flying in Nuuk (Greenland's capital) versus the Greenlandic flag,” he told The Associated Press. “There’s no benefits to them because they already enjoy all of the advantages they want.

"If there’s any specific security access that they want to improve American security, they’ll be given it as a matter of course, as a trusted ally. So this has nothing to do with improving national security for the United States.”

Denmark’s parliament approved a bill last June to allow US military bases on Danish soil. It widened a previous military agreement, made in 2023 with the Biden administration, where US troops had broad access to Danish air bases in the Scandinavian country.

Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, in a response to lawmakers’ questions, wrote over the summer that Denmark would be able to terminate the agreement if the US tries to annex all or part of Greenland.

Danish armed forces in Greenland

Denmark is moving to strengthen its military presence around Greenland and in the wider North Atlantic. Last year, the government announced a roughly 14.6 billion-kroner ($2.3 billion) agreement with parties including the governments of Greenland and the Faroe Islands, another self-governing territory of Denmark, to “improve capabilities for surveillance and maintaining sovereignty in the region.”

The plan includes three new Arctic naval vessels, two additional long-range surveillance drones and satellite capacity.

Denmark’s Joint Arctic Command is headquartered in Nuuk, and tasked with the “surveillance, assertion of sovereignty and military defense of Greenland and the Faroe Islands,” according to its website. It has smaller satellite stations across the island.

The Sirius Dog Sled Patrol, an elite Danish naval unit that conducts long-range reconnaissance and enforces Danish sovereignty in the Arctic wilderness, is also stationed in Greenland.

Mineral wealth

Greenland is also a rich source of the so-called rare earth minerals that are a key component of cellphones, computers, batteries and other high-tech gadgets that are expected to power the world’s economy in the coming decades.

That has attracted the interest of the US and other Western powers as they try to ease China’s dominance of the market for these critical minerals.

Development of Greenland’s mineral resources is challenging because of the island’s harsh climate, while strict environmental controls have proved an additional hurdle for potential investors.


Protest-Hit Iran Warily Watches the US After its Raid on Venezuela

Iranians protest a 22-year-old woman Mahsa Amini's death after she was detained by the morality police, in Tehran, Sept. 20, 2022, in this photo taken by an individual not employed by the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran. (AP Photo/ File)
Iranians protest a 22-year-old woman Mahsa Amini's death after she was detained by the morality police, in Tehran, Sept. 20, 2022, in this photo taken by an individual not employed by the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran. (AP Photo/ File)
TT

Protest-Hit Iran Warily Watches the US After its Raid on Venezuela

Iranians protest a 22-year-old woman Mahsa Amini's death after she was detained by the morality police, in Tehran, Sept. 20, 2022, in this photo taken by an individual not employed by the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran. (AP Photo/ File)
Iranians protest a 22-year-old woman Mahsa Amini's death after she was detained by the morality police, in Tehran, Sept. 20, 2022, in this photo taken by an individual not employed by the Associated Press and obtained by the AP outside Iran. (AP Photo/ File)

Iran faces a new round of protests challenging the country's theocracy, but it seems like the only thing people there want to talk about is half a world away: Venezuela.

Since the US military seized Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, a longtime ally of Tehran, over the weekend, Iranian state media headlines and officials have condemned the operation. In the streets and even in some official conversations, however, there's a growing question over whether a similar mission could target the country's top officials including the supreme leader, 86-year-old Ali Khamenei.

The paranoia feeds into wider worries among Iranians. Many fear that close US ally Israel will target Iran again as it did during the 12-day war it launched against Tehran in June. Israel killed a slew of top military officials and nuclear scientists, and the US bombed Iranian nuclear enrichment sites. Khamenei is believed to have gone into hiding for his protection.

“God bless our leader, we should be careful too," said Saeed Seyyedi, a 57-year-old teacher in Tehran, worried the US could act as it did in Venezuela.

"The US has always been after plots against Iran, especially when issues like oil, Israel are part of the case. In addition, it can be complicated when it is mixed with the Russia-Ukraine war, the Lebanese (group) Hezbollah and drug accusations.”

The US long has accused the Iranian-backed Hezbollah of running drug-smuggling operations to fund its operations, including in Latin America, which the group denies.

‘Please pray’

Immediately after Maduro’s seizure, an analyst on Iranian state television claimed, without offering evidence, that the US and Israel had plans during the war last year to kidnap Iranian officials with a team of dual-national Iranians. Even for conspiracy-minded Iranian television, airing such a claim is unusual.

Then on Sunday night, the prominent cleric Mohammad Ali Javedan warned an audience at prayers in Tehran University that Khamenei's life was in danger.

“Someone said he had a bad dream that the leader’s life is in danger," Javedan said, without elaborating. "Please pray.”

However, Iran is roughly twice the size of Venezuela and has what analysts consider to be a much stronger military and robust security forces. The memory of Operation Eagle Claw, a failed US special forces mission to rescue hostages held after the 1979 US Embassy takeover in Tehran, also haunts Washington.

Then there's the political situation in Iran, with its theocracy protected by hard-liners within the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, who answer only to Khamenei.

They could launch assassinations, cyberattacks and assaults on shipping in the Middle East, warned Farzin Nadimi, senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy who studies Iran’s military.

And crucially, Iran also still has fissile nuclear material.

“In the grand-strategy scheme of things, they need to think about the day after,” Nadimi said of anyone considering a Venezuela-style raid. “Iran is a much more complex political situation. They have to calculate the costs and benefits.”

Not just the Iranians

Others wonder what part of the world the US might take interest in next, while critics have warned about setting a dangerous precedent.

“The regime in Iran should pay close attention to what is happening in Venezuela,” Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid posted on social media on Saturday.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not directly link Maduro's detention to Iran but acknowledged the protests sweeping Tehran and other cities, saying: “It is very possible that we are standing at the moment when the Iranian people are taking their fate into their own hands.”

Hours before the US action in Venezuela, US President Donald Trump warned Iran that if Tehran “violently kills peaceful protesters” the US “will come to their rescue.”

On Monday, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei denounced the comments by Trump and Netanyahu as an “incitement to violence, terrorism and killing.”

US Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Republican who had been close to Trump but resigned Monday after a falling-out with the president, directly linked the Venezuela operation to Iran.

“The next obvious observation is that by removing Maduro this is a clear move for control over Venezuelan oil supplies that will ensure stability for the next obvious regime change war in Iran," Greene wrote on social media.

‘Make Iran Great Again’

US Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican, put on a “Make Iran Great Again” hat during a Sunday segment on Fox News. He later posted an image showing him and Trump smiling after the president autographed a similar-looking hat.

“I pray and hope that 2026 will be the year that we make Iran great again," Graham said.


Iran at a Critical Crossroads Testing the Survival of its Regime

Burning debris lies in the middle of a street during protests in Hamedan, western Iran, Jan. 1, 2026. (AFP/Getty Images)
Burning debris lies in the middle of a street during protests in Hamedan, western Iran, Jan. 1, 2026. (AFP/Getty Images)
TT

Iran at a Critical Crossroads Testing the Survival of its Regime

Burning debris lies in the middle of a street during protests in Hamedan, western Iran, Jan. 1, 2026. (AFP/Getty Images)
Burning debris lies in the middle of a street during protests in Hamedan, western Iran, Jan. 1, 2026. (AFP/Getty Images)

Iran is confronting one of the most consequential junctures since the founding of the republic in 1979. The pressures bearing down on the system are no longer confined to economic sanctions or familiar forms of external coercion, but now cut to the heart of the governing formula itself: how to ensure the regime’s survival without accelerating the very forces that threaten to undermine it.

At the center of this moment lies a stark existential dilemma. A permissive response to internal unrest risks allowing protests to spread and harden into a protracted campaign of political attrition, while a sweeping security crackdown would heighten external dangers, at a time of mounting international hostility and unprecedented US warnings.

Caught between these two paths, Tehran finds its room for maneuver shrinking to levels it has rarely faced before.

Passing protests or structural shift?

The evolution of the current protests raises a central question about their nature: are they a containable social wave, or a deeper expression of a shift in public mood? The spread of demonstrations to small and medium-sized cities, and the widening of their social base, reflect an advanced level of discontent, even if it has not yet reached the threshold of a comprehensive explosion.

Farzin Nadimi, a senior Iran analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, argues that this wave differs from previous ones.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the latest protests, unlike earlier waves led by university students or low-income workers in major cities, are now driven by young people in smaller towns and supported by university students nationwide.

He described them as “more entrenched and widespread,” though not yet as large as some previous protests, noting the absence of government employees and oil workers, alongside a strong female presence once again.

This assessment aligns with the reading of Michael Rubin, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, who pointed to three key differences defining this wave: the nature of the participating forces, the symbolism of its launch from Tehran’s bazaar, and the impact of Israeli strikes that have punctured the aura surrounding Iran.

By contrast, Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, cautions against overestimating the street’s ability to bring about rapid change, noting that the Iranian system is highly organized and does not hesitate to use violence to control society.

‘Political fuel’

Iran’s economic crisis is no longer a technical issue that can be separated from politics. The collapse of the currency, the erosion of purchasing power, and declining trust in institutions have turned the economy into a direct driver of protest.

With each new round of pressure or sanctions, the sense deepens that the system is incapable of delivering real solutions without making political concessions.

Alex Vatanka, a Senior Fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington, argues that what is unfolding goes beyond anger over prices or living conditions.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that the protests reflect a deeper shift in public opinion, in which opposition is no longer directed at specific policies but at the model of governance itself. This shift, he said, confronts the system with a difficult question: can the economy be saved without rethinking the structure of power?

The security establishment: cohesion or fatigue?

Security institutions, from the Revolutionary Guards and their Basij mobilization arm to the intelligence services, form the backbone of the system’s ability to endure. Historically, these institutions have been the primary guarantor of internal stability, but mounting pressures now raise questions about their moral and ideological cohesion.

Rubin said that cracks are widening, pointing to rumors that Tehran has turned to deploying forces from Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces and Afghanistan’s Fatemiyoun Brigade due to declining confidence in some Revolutionary Guard units’ willingness to carry out orders.

Vatanka, for his part, acknowledged that these institutions remain cohesive for now, but warned that this cohesion is under growing strain from economic and social exhaustion, which over time could erode morale and produce partial fractures, even if open defections remain unlikely in the foreseeable future.

From deterrence to breaking taboos

If internal challenges are pressing on the structure of power, the external environment multiplies the risks. US-Israeli escalation, coupled with the waning weight of regional allies, places Iran before a radically different strategic landscape.

Threats by US President Donald Trump to support Iranian protesters signal a qualitative shift in US rhetoric, in which the focus is no longer confined to the nuclear program, but now includes Iran’s internal dynamics as part of the pressure equation.

Nadimi said that the developments in Venezuela and the arrest of Nicolas Maduro as carrying troubling implications for Tehran, while stressing the differences between the two cases, arguing that Iran is larger and more complex, and that Washington does not believe its system can be easily overthrown without a clear internal alternative.

Vatanka, however, sees a significant psychological impact from that precedent, saying it has weakened the assumption that leaders are immune from personal targeting.

The regional network: asset or burden?

Israeli strikes in June that targeted military leaders and sovereign symbols inside Iran reflect a shift in Israel’s security doctrine, from containment to direct confrontation.

O’Hanlon said that this pattern, following events in Venezuela and attacks on figures linked to Iran’s nuclear program, has become more likely under Trump, reflecting a willingness to break taboos that once held.

At the same time, questions are resurfacing over the effectiveness of Iran’s regional network. According to Vatanka, these arms are no longer a real deterrent, but have become, given their rising costs, a strategic burden.

Rubin agreed, adding that they have drained the state treasury, although he does not rule out the system turning to them if the crisis intensifies on the domestic front.

Amid this complex entanglement between internal and external pressures, the Iranian system’s options are narrowing as never before.

Between those who see this weakness as an opportunity to rebalance the region and those who fear widespread chaos, the core question remains: Is Tehran facing a manageable crisis of governance or an existential crisis that could shape Iran and the region for decades to come?