Ghassan Salame’s Road to Solve the Libyan Dilemma

Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
TT
20

Ghassan Salame’s Road to Solve the Libyan Dilemma

Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi

UN Envoy for Libya Ghassan Salame said that a solution to the Libyan crisis would need three requisites, namely the constitution, the elections and the national reconciliation.

Salame, a former Lebanese minister and prominent academic, assumed the position of international envoy to Libya last September, and shortly after he submitted a roadmap for a Libyan solution, which received unanimous support from the UN Security Council and General Assembly.

In Cairo, which is currently sponsoring attempts by Libyan officials to unify the army, Salame, 66, listened to officials at the Egyptian defense ministry and expressed his hope that the efforts deployed by Cairo would yield positively on the unification of Libya’s institutions, warning that divisions would further weaken the central government in the country.

Salame spent less than two days in Egypt, where he held extensive meetings with officials at the Egyptian government and the Arab League. Then, he headed to Tunisia, to pursue his efforts towards a solution to the Libyan crisis.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Salame said he was seeking to complete the work of the UN mission, which, in 2015, has succeeded in forging the Skhirat Agreement between the different Libyan factions.

The agreement stipulated, among other items, the formation of a presidential council and an interim government.

After nearly two years of continuous efforts, Libya remains in turmoil. Salame wants to rearrange things, not from outside the political agreement, but from within it. This may require a surgeon’s skill, because the situation is complicated, and the Libyans’ ambitions are big, hasty and also confusing.

A political process, whether in Libya or in any other country, “is like flower in your home... if you do not water it, every day, it withers and dies,” Salame said.

He continued: “I want all Libyans to adopt a political solution, and I do not want the political solution to be monopolized by a certain group.”

“I want all Libyans to accept two things… first, not a return to the past, and second, to build the future in consultation and negotiation, not with weapons,” Salame added.

The UN envoy touched on the role of Egypt in the process of unifying the Libyan army, describing it as “a special role that we want to succeed”.

He also expressed his desire to remain “more clearly aware of what is actually happening on the ground in relation to the security and military situation” in Libya.

Based on his words, Salame seemed to be very concerned with the divisions within Libyan institutions. Even the central bank suffers from a split that negatively affects the economy and the lives of millions of people.

“I never seek quick fake victories. I seek the establishment of permanent institutions of durable nature. So I was interested, for example, in the process of unifying the army, and work hard to unite a large number of other institutions,” he stated.

Salame’s lengthy discussions, both in the Egyptian foreign ministry and elsewhere, have touched on the fear of the spread of illegal weapons in a country without a unified or strong authority.

“If you are a neighbor of a country with 23 million pieces of weapons, and where the government is not able to control this weapon, it is your legitimate right to say, 'I want to protect my border,'” he said

“Egypt’s border with Libya is long, and the Egyptian State pays hundreds of millions of pounds to defend and control its western borders,” Salame noted, adding that Algeria and Tunisia have both expressed the same concerns.

Salame voiced his fear that resorting to elections in conflict-prone countries would be just an escape.

“Sometimes elections are an escape, when a solution cannot be found. I am not a proponent of such escape. I tell you, I was against the first elections that took place in Iraq after the invasion, because I did not find that there was enough freedom for the people to run and vote. There are many similar cases in the world… in Angola, Algeria, and elsewhere,” he said.

In the Libyan case, Salame noted that he was seeking to repeat the Tunisian experience he was involved in three years ago.

“I have a simple, modest experience that I am talking about proudly,” he says.

“In 2014 we were able to gather all the main party leaders in Tunisia. They came to the town hall and pledged before all the cameras in the world to accept the outcome of the elections before they were held ... I will say frankly: Yes, I am seeking this in Libya,” Salame recounted.

In order to achieve this goal, the UN envoy underlined the need to form an interim government that would emerge from the heart of the political agreement. He noted that such government would take care of the living conditions of the people, while managing the political affairs until the end of the transitional phase in September.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.