Ghassan Salame’s Road to Solve the Libyan Dilemma

Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
TT
20

Ghassan Salame’s Road to Solve the Libyan Dilemma

Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
Ghassan Salame, UN Libya envoy, arrives for a meeting in Tunis, Tunisia September 26, 2017. REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi

UN Envoy for Libya Ghassan Salame said that a solution to the Libyan crisis would need three requisites, namely the constitution, the elections and the national reconciliation.

Salame, a former Lebanese minister and prominent academic, assumed the position of international envoy to Libya last September, and shortly after he submitted a roadmap for a Libyan solution, which received unanimous support from the UN Security Council and General Assembly.

In Cairo, which is currently sponsoring attempts by Libyan officials to unify the army, Salame, 66, listened to officials at the Egyptian defense ministry and expressed his hope that the efforts deployed by Cairo would yield positively on the unification of Libya’s institutions, warning that divisions would further weaken the central government in the country.

Salame spent less than two days in Egypt, where he held extensive meetings with officials at the Egyptian government and the Arab League. Then, he headed to Tunisia, to pursue his efforts towards a solution to the Libyan crisis.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Salame said he was seeking to complete the work of the UN mission, which, in 2015, has succeeded in forging the Skhirat Agreement between the different Libyan factions.

The agreement stipulated, among other items, the formation of a presidential council and an interim government.

After nearly two years of continuous efforts, Libya remains in turmoil. Salame wants to rearrange things, not from outside the political agreement, but from within it. This may require a surgeon’s skill, because the situation is complicated, and the Libyans’ ambitions are big, hasty and also confusing.

A political process, whether in Libya or in any other country, “is like flower in your home... if you do not water it, every day, it withers and dies,” Salame said.

He continued: “I want all Libyans to adopt a political solution, and I do not want the political solution to be monopolized by a certain group.”

“I want all Libyans to accept two things… first, not a return to the past, and second, to build the future in consultation and negotiation, not with weapons,” Salame added.

The UN envoy touched on the role of Egypt in the process of unifying the Libyan army, describing it as “a special role that we want to succeed”.

He also expressed his desire to remain “more clearly aware of what is actually happening on the ground in relation to the security and military situation” in Libya.

Based on his words, Salame seemed to be very concerned with the divisions within Libyan institutions. Even the central bank suffers from a split that negatively affects the economy and the lives of millions of people.

“I never seek quick fake victories. I seek the establishment of permanent institutions of durable nature. So I was interested, for example, in the process of unifying the army, and work hard to unite a large number of other institutions,” he stated.

Salame’s lengthy discussions, both in the Egyptian foreign ministry and elsewhere, have touched on the fear of the spread of illegal weapons in a country without a unified or strong authority.

“If you are a neighbor of a country with 23 million pieces of weapons, and where the government is not able to control this weapon, it is your legitimate right to say, 'I want to protect my border,'” he said

“Egypt’s border with Libya is long, and the Egyptian State pays hundreds of millions of pounds to defend and control its western borders,” Salame noted, adding that Algeria and Tunisia have both expressed the same concerns.

Salame voiced his fear that resorting to elections in conflict-prone countries would be just an escape.

“Sometimes elections are an escape, when a solution cannot be found. I am not a proponent of such escape. I tell you, I was against the first elections that took place in Iraq after the invasion, because I did not find that there was enough freedom for the people to run and vote. There are many similar cases in the world… in Angola, Algeria, and elsewhere,” he said.

In the Libyan case, Salame noted that he was seeking to repeat the Tunisian experience he was involved in three years ago.

“I have a simple, modest experience that I am talking about proudly,” he says.

“In 2014 we were able to gather all the main party leaders in Tunisia. They came to the town hall and pledged before all the cameras in the world to accept the outcome of the elections before they were held ... I will say frankly: Yes, I am seeking this in Libya,” Salame recounted.

In order to achieve this goal, the UN envoy underlined the need to form an interim government that would emerge from the heart of the political agreement. He noted that such government would take care of the living conditions of the people, while managing the political affairs until the end of the transitional phase in September.



Syrian Minister of Economy: Sanctions Relief Tied to Reforms

Syrian Minister of Economy and Industry Nidal Al-Shaar standing in line outside Al-Razi Bakery in Aleppo Province, listening to citizens’ concerns (Facebook page). 
Syrian Minister of Economy and Industry Nidal Al-Shaar standing in line outside Al-Razi Bakery in Aleppo Province, listening to citizens’ concerns (Facebook page). 
TT
20

Syrian Minister of Economy: Sanctions Relief Tied to Reforms

Syrian Minister of Economy and Industry Nidal Al-Shaar standing in line outside Al-Razi Bakery in Aleppo Province, listening to citizens’ concerns (Facebook page). 
Syrian Minister of Economy and Industry Nidal Al-Shaar standing in line outside Al-Razi Bakery in Aleppo Province, listening to citizens’ concerns (Facebook page). 

Syrian Minister of Economy and Industry Nidal Al-Shaar stated that while the serious lifting of US sanctions on Syria could gradually yield positive results for the country’s economy, expectations must remain realistic, as rebuilding trust in the Syrian economy is essential.

In an exclusive interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Al-Shaar described the removal of sanctions as a necessary first step toward eliminating the obstacles that have long hindered Syria’s economic recovery. Although the immediate impact will likely be limited, he noted that in the medium term, improvements in trade activity and the resumption of some banking transactions could help create a more favorable environment for investment and production.

The breakthrough came after Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman successfully facilitated a thaw in relations between Washington and Damascus, ultimately convincing the US president to lift sanctions on Syria. During his historic visit to Saudi Arabia last Wednesday, President Donald Trump announced he would order the removal of all sanctions on Syria to “give it a chance to thrive”—a move seen as a major opportunity for the country to begin a new chapter.

Al-Shaar cautioned, however, that Syrians should not expect an immediate improvement in living standards. “We need to manage the post-sanctions phase with an open and pragmatic economic mindset,” he said, stressing that real progress will only come if sanctions relief is accompanied by meaningful economic reforms, increased transparency, and support for the business climate.

He added that Syrians will begin to feel the difference when the cost of living declines and job opportunities grow—an outcome that requires time, planning, and stability.

According to Al-Shaar, the first tangible benefits of lifting sanctions are likely to be seen in the banking and trade sectors, through facilitated financial transfers, improved access to essential goods, and lower transportation and import costs. “We may also see initial interest from investors who were previously deterred by legal restrictions,” he said. “But it’s important to emphasize that political openness alone isn’t enough—there must also be genuine economic openness from within.”

He also underscored the importance of regional support, saying that any positive role played by neighboring countries in encouraging the US to lift sanctions and normalize ties with Damascus “must be met with appreciation and cooperation.” Al-Shaar emphasized that robust intra-Arab economic relations should form a cornerstone of any reconstruction phase. “We need an economic approach that is open to the Arab world, and we could see strategic partnerships that reignite the national economy—especially through the financing of major infrastructure and development projects.”

When asked whether he expects a surge in Arab and foreign investment following the lifting of sanctions, Al-Shaar responded: “Yes, there is growing interest in investing in Syria, and several companies have already entered the market. But investors first and foremost seek legal certainty and political guarantees.” He explained that investment is not driven solely by the removal of sanctions, but by the presence of an encouraging institutional environment. “If we can enhance transparency, streamline procedures, and ensure stability, we will gradually see greater capital inflows—especially in the service, industrial, and agricultural sectors.”

As for which countries may play a significant role in Syria’s reconstruction, Al-Shaar said: “Countries with long-term interests in regional stability will be at the forefront of the rebuilding process. But we must first rebuild our internal foundations and develop an economic model capable of attracting partners under balanced conditions—ones that protect economic sovereignty and promote inclusive development.”

The minister concluded by stressing that lifting sanctions, while significant, is not the end of the crisis. “Rather, it may mark the beginning of a new phase—one filled with challenges,” he said. “The greatest challenge isn’t securing funding, but managing resources wisely, upholding the principles of productivity, justice, and transparency. We need a proactive—not reactive—economy. We must restore the value of work and implement policies that put people at the center of development. Only then can we say we are beginning to emerge from the bottleneck.”

Last Wednesday, Riyadh hosted a landmark meeting between the Crown Prince, Trump, and Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa—marking the first meeting between a Syrian and a US president since Hafez Al-Assad met Bill Clinton in Geneva in 2000.

Most US sanctions on Syria were imposed after the outbreak of the country’s conflict in 2011. These targeted deposed President Bashar Al-Assad, members of his family, and various political and economic figures. In 2020, additional sanctions came into effect under the Caesar Act, targeting Assad’s inner circle and imposing severe penalties on any entity or company dealing with the Syrian regime. The Act also sanctioned Syria’s construction, oil, and gas sectors and prohibited US funding for reconstruction—while exempting humanitarian organizations operating in the country.