‘Shi’ite Signature’ May Re-Spark Dispute between Lebanese President, Speaker

Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri. (NNA)
Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri. (NNA)
TT
20

‘Shi’ite Signature’ May Re-Spark Dispute between Lebanese President, Speaker

Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri. (NNA)
Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Saad Hariri. (NNA)

Lebanese President Michel Aoun and Prime Minister Saad Hariri recently signed a decree on “giving priority” to officers who graduated from the military academy in 1994.

This issue reopened a debate in Lebanon over the “Shi’ite signature” on the majority of decrees in the country.

Decrees are usually signed by the president, a Christian, and the premier, a Sunni. The signature of Finance Minister Ali Hassan Khalil, a Shi’ite, was ignored in this case, which angered Speaker Nabih Berri, also a Shi’ite.

The development may reflect negatively on Berri’s relationship with Aoun and fuel his insistence that a Shi’ite be handed the Finance Ministry portfolio in future cabinets. This would ensure that the Shi’ite voice is heard in any government decree.

Informed sources told Asharq Al-Awsat that the “priority for officers” decree does not have financial demands and therefore does not need the minister’s signature.

“What happened was not a precedent and it does not deserve this uproar,” they remarked.

They stressed that several decrees had been signed in the past by presidents without the signature of the Finance Minister.

They underlined however that the president is keen on respecting the sectarian balance in Lebanon.

They questioned however the timing of the campaign against the signing of the decree, keeping in mind that several decrees had been issued by Aoun without Khalil’s signature and no one protested against them.



Israel Draws up Buffer Zone in Southern Lebanon, Warns People against Approaching it

Israeli artillery fire is seen in the Lebanese section of Shebaa. (AFP file)
Israeli artillery fire is seen in the Lebanese section of Shebaa. (AFP file)
TT
20

Israel Draws up Buffer Zone in Southern Lebanon, Warns People against Approaching it

Israeli artillery fire is seen in the Lebanese section of Shebaa. (AFP file)
Israeli artillery fire is seen in the Lebanese section of Shebaa. (AFP file)

Israel has drawn up a map of a buffer zone in southern Lebanon, the first time it has done so since the ceasefire agreement went into effect in November.

An Israeli drone threw on Thursday leaflets with a map of the zone as it flew over the southeastern town of Shebaa.

The map delineated the zone with a red line, warning people against crossing it. “Anyone who enters the area is putting himself in danger,” read the leaflet.

Some observers said such a move is purely part of Israeli security measures, while others have interpreted it as an attempt to impose a new reality on the ground.

Field sources said Israel had previously thrown similar leaflets in Shebaa in July, warning beekeepers to clear areas Israel had deemed as “sensitive”.

On Wednesday, Israeli Chief of the General Staff commander Eyal Zamir toured areas inside southern Lebanon, in a move seen as consolidating the new security status quo on the border.

Retired Major General Dr. Abdel Rahman Shahtali said that with the new map, Israel is working on imposing a new reality along the border.

This is a very dangerous development, “rather, it is more dangerous than dangerous,” he told Asharq al-Awsat.

He warned that if Lebanon agrees to it, then it is effectively giving up Lebanese territory to Israel.

These areas are defined as Lebanese through official agreements between Lebanon and Syria, he stressed.

The area covered in the new map spans around 50 kms squared. “These are completely Lebanese areas,” Shahtali said.

He explained that Israel is aiming to prevent the owners of these territories from accessing them and planting their crops there, in an attempt to consolidate their gradual occupation, just the way it did in the Syrian Golan Heights.

At first it imposed new field realities before later annexing the Golan, he remarked.

The new map effectively draws a new border between Lebanon and Israel, which may later be used as the basis of any new agreements or settlements in the future. The new measure must be confronted immediately, he urged.

As for Shebaa, Shahtali explained that Israel had occupied one section of the area in 1967 during a war that Lebanon did not even join.

Syrian forces were deployed there at the time and so, Israel viewed the territory as Syrian, he said. Israel expanded its occupation in the following years.

Shahtali demanded that the Lebanese government take an immediate strong response to the development and file a complaint at the United Nations.