Opposition Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iranian Regime Is a Soviet Product

Iranian anti-regime protests. (AFP)
Iranian anti-regime protests. (AFP)
TT

Opposition Official to Asharq Al-Awsat: Iranian Regime Is a Soviet Product

Iranian anti-regime protests. (AFP)
Iranian anti-regime protests. (AFP)

The US Congress described the National Iranian Congress (NIC) as the most influential opposition group in the country. Its founder, Amir-Abbas Fakhravar, has been in opposition to the regime since he was a student and he has been thrown in jail 19 times for his views. His torture in prison has not deterred him from pursuing his mission to expose the regime as a Russian product that only seeks to expand in the region at the expense of the Iranian people. In 2006, Fakhravar managed to flee to the US where he established contacts with senior officials.

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that former US President Barack Obama betrayed the Iranians, the Middle East and the whole world. Had it not been for him, the current regime would have collapsed. Fakhravar, 42, is currently close to the administration of President Donald Trump and he makes frequent visits to Congress to inform them of the real developments inside Iran.

Fakhravar first came at odds with the Iranian regime when he delivered a speech when he was a student of 16 years, asking: “Why doesn’t the regime benefit from the talents of the new generation to fix the country’s problems?” That question landed him eight months of solitary confinement in a prison in northwestern Iran. There, he mocked the supreme leader, saying: “Contrary to what he claims, I do not believe we have freedom in this country.” This landed him another prison sentence where he came under severe torture.

In 1999, he released a book, “The Greenest Eyes on Earth,” that earned him international fame. This, in turn, earned him an eight-year term in jail. He never finished the sentence and instead managed to escape to the US, where he later released another book, “Comrade Ayatollah.”

In the book, he highlights the role played by the Soviet Union in the Iranian revolution and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s eventual ascension to power. Over three million copies of the publication were sold in the black market in Iran. The book includes hundreds of documents that reveal that Iran’s mullahs are not spiritual leaders, but in fact Soviet agents of the KGB intelligence agency. They received training in Moscow in the 1960s and 70s and the book includes documents to verify these assertions.

“I obtained the documents from the KJB archive, as well as the CIA and Israeli Mossad and even the Iranian intelligence itself. I did not use a single Iranian opposition document,” Fakhravar told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“After the book was released, several Khamenei supporters, Basij and Iranian Revolutionary Guards members contacted me to thank me for opening their eyes because they believed the regime was holy,” he added.

The recent anti-regime protests have demonstrated the weakness of the regime, he said, while stressing that the demonstrations are still ongoing.

He also asserted that Khamenei and his family had fled to Russia, to which Russian officials said that he was currently in Turkey.

Several hundred other senior Iranian officials have also fled the country, stated Fakhravar.

How can a regime claim to be so stable when something as simple as a social media call for protest could make it falter? he asked.

The opposition figure said that his movement had worked from as far back as 1999 to try to achieve change in Iran. Despite the failure of demonstrations in 1999 and 2009, “we have hope in the new protests.” Fakhravar attributed his optimism to the new US administration after Obama “betrayed the 2009 movement.”

Trump in a tweet said that he will support the people if they took to the streets once again.

“We want the president to back the people and prevent the regime from committing a bloodbath,” declared Fakhravar, revealing that he had contacted the administration to urge it for its support. Trump’s tweet was the result of Fakhravar’s efforts.

“This gave hope to the people that the situation this time around would be different,” he claimed.

Moreover, he said that his book, “Comrade Ayatollah,” also helped shed light to the Iranians on the developments going on behind the scenes in their country. “This was demonstrated in how several members of the Basij and Revolutionary Guards refused to confront the protesters, while several Guards personnel actually fearlessly tore up their membership cards,” he remarked.

Asked if Russian President Vladimir Putin would allow the Iranian regime to falter, Fakhravar replied that he will help it stay in power and protesters were heard chanting: “The Russian embassy is a center for the spies.” In the past, the chants used to be directed against the American embassy, but the Iranians now know the real story behind the revolution and regime.

“Russia and China will support the regime until the end and they will not leave our country alone,” he noted.

“We are struggling to achieve democracy and freedom and we stand against the mullah regime and their Russian protectors,” he declared.

He revealed that the opposition had presented a new Iranian constitution to the US Congress. The opposition stressed that a new Iran would not be a state sponsor of terrorism or seek to control other countries.

“We want freedom and democracy and we want to be good neighbors in the region,” Fakhravar said.

The demonstrations, he added, have not stopped and protesters have been instructed to write anti-regime slogans on walls throughout the country.

He warned that the situation could escalate into an armed conflict if the regime chose to use force to suppress the protesters, who could easily acquire weapons from border regions.

Fakhravar firmly believed that the protesters, if successful, could change the region and the world.

“The regime is not as smart as the new generation of Iranian youths,” he stressed to Asharq Al-Awsat.

On whether President Hassan Rouhani aspires to become the new supreme leader, Fakhravar replied that up until last month, this dream was feasible.

“His recent budget, however, revealed that the funds are going to the spiritual leaders and powerful officials. Rouhani was lining himself to be the new supreme leader, but the recent protests destroyed that dream.”



Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
TT

Goldrich to Asharq Al-Awsat: No US Withdrawal from Syria

US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat
US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich during the interview with Asharq Al-Awsat

Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ethan Goldrich has told Asharq Al-Awsat that the US does not plan to withdraw its forces from Syria.

The US is committed to “the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with,” he said.

Here is the full text of the interview.

Question: Mr. Goldrich, thank you so much for taking the time to sit with us today. I know you are leaving your post soon. How do you assess the accomplishments and challenges remaining?

Answer: Thank you very much for the chance to talk with you today. I've been in this position for three years, and so at the end of three years, I can see that there's a lot that we accomplished and a lot that we have left to do. But at the beginning of a time I was here, we had just completed a review of our Syria policy, and we saw that we needed to focus on reducing suffering for the people in Syria. We needed to reduce violence. We needed to hold the regime accountable for things that are done and most importantly, from the US perspective, we needed to keep ISIS from reemerging as a threat to our country and to other countries. At the same time, we also realized that there wouldn't be a solution to the crisis until there was a political process under resolution 2254, so in each of these areas, we've seen both progress and challenges, but of course, on ISIS, we have prevented the reemergence of the threat from northeast Syria, and we've helped deal with people that needed to be repatriated out of the prisons, and we dealt with displaced people in al-Hol to reduce the numbers there. We helped provide for stabilization in those parts of Syria.

Question: I want to talk a little bit about the ISIS situation now that the US troops are still there, do you envision a timeline where they will be withdrawn? Because there were some reports in the press that there is a plan from the Biden administration to withdraw.

Answer: Yeah. So right now, our focus is on the mission that we have there to keep ISIS from reemerging. So I know there have been reports, but I want to make clear that we remain committed to the role that we play in that part of Syria, to the partnership that we have with the local forces that we work with, and to the need to prevent that threat from reemerging.

Question: So you can assure people who are saying that you might withdraw, that you are remaining for the time being?

Answer: Yes, and that we remain committed to this mission which needs to continue to be pursued.

Question: You also mentioned the importance of humanitarian aid. The US has been leading on this. Are you satisfied with where you are today on the humanitarian front in Syria?

Answer: We remain committed to the role that we play to provide for humanitarian assistance in Syria. Of the money that was pledged in Brussels, we pledged $593 million just this past spring, and we overall, since the beginning of the conflict, have provided $18 billion both to help the Syrians who are inside of Syria and to help the refugees who are in surrounding countries. And so we remain committed to providing that assistance, and we remain keenly aware that 90% of Syrians are living in poverty right now, and that there's been suffering there. We're doing everything we can to reduce the suffering, but I think where we would really like to be is where there's a larger solution to the whole crisis, so Syrian people someday will be able to provide again for themselves and not need this assistance.

Question: And that's a perfect key to my next question. Solution in Syria. you are aware that the countries in the region are opening up to Assad again, and you also have the EU signaling overture to the Syrian regime and Assad. How do you deal with that?

Answer: For the United States, our policy continues to be that we will not normalize with the regime in Syria until there's been authentic and enduring progress on the goals of resolution 2254, until the human rights of the Syrian people are respected and until they have the civil and human rights that they deserve. We know other countries have engaged with the regime. When those engagements happen, we don't support them, but we remind the countries that are engaged that they should be using their engagements to push forward on the shared international goals under 2254, and that whatever it is that they're doing should be for the sake of improving the situation of the Syrian people.

Question: Let's say that all of the countries decided to talk to Assad, aren’t you worried that the US will be alienated in the process?

Answer: The US will remain true to our own principles and our own policies and our own laws, and the path for the regime in Syria to change its relationship with us is very clear, if they change the behaviors that led to the laws that we have and to the policies that we have, if those behaviors change and the circumstances inside of Syria change, then it's possible to have a different kind of relationship, but that's where it has to start.

Question: My last question to you before you leave, if you have to pick one thing that you need to do in Syria today, what is it that you would like to see happening today?

Answer: So there are a number of things, I think that will always be left and that there are things that we will try to do, to try to make them happen. We want to hold people accountable in Syria for things that have happened. So even today, we observed something called the International Day for victims of enforced disappearances, there are people that are missing, and we're trying to draw attention to the need to account for the missing people. So our step today was to sanction a number of officials who were responsible for enforced disappearances, but we also created something called the independent institution for missing persons, and that helps the families, in the non-political way, get information on what's happened. So I'd like to see some peace for the families of the missing people. I'd like to see the beginning of a political process, there hasn't been a meeting of the constitutional committee in two years, and I think that's because the regime has not been cooperating in political process steps. So we need to change that situation. And I would, of course, like it's important to see the continuation of the things that we were talking about, so keeping ISIS from reemerging and maintaining assistance as necessary in the humanitarian sphere. So all these things, some of them are ongoing, and some of them remain to be achieved. But the Syrian people deserve all aspects of our policy to be fulfilled and for them to be able to return to a normal life.