‘Isnad’ Center Aims to Go beyond Aid and Provide Development for Yemen

The King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center delivers aid in Yemen. (SPA)
The King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center delivers aid in Yemen. (SPA)
TT
20

‘Isnad’ Center Aims to Go beyond Aid and Provide Development for Yemen

The King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center delivers aid in Yemen. (SPA)
The King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center delivers aid in Yemen. (SPA)

In December 2017, the Saudi capital Riyadh hosted two important meetings to draft a humanitarian plan for Yemen.

The coalition for restoring legitimacy in Yemen presented to officials traveling from the UN a plan that seeks to go beyond simply providing aid. It seeks to improve living conditions in Yemen, as well as implement development and economic plans. The plan will effectively reach all regions without discrimination and provide safe passages and improve and develop current ones.

After a series of meetings and studies, the Isnad center was established with the purpose of implementing a comprehensive humanitarian operation throughout Yemen. A number of media appearances, interviews and social media posts were made to highlight this initiative.

The United Nations has since the Houthi coup of September 2014 been operating in Yemen as part of what activists said was a “temporary” plan.

Representative of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Jamie McGoldrick, who recently completed his mission in Yemen, said that the organization had worked tirelessly with its partners to meet the demands of 10 million Yemeni people in the past year.

He added that operations targeted the most vulnerable people, but acknowledged that workers in the humanitarian field had limited means and resources. The only way to meet the needs of the people is through ending the war and resuming political consultations.

Yemeni activist Al-Bara Shiban responded to McGoldrick, saying that UN relief agencies tried to show that resolving the Yemeni conflict starts by ending the humanitarian crisis. They fail to see that the failure of the political process is the cause of the war.

Ending the conflict therefore should not always be addressed from the humanitarian angle because the humanitarian crisis was caused by the failure of the political process, he added.

They are therefore not addressing the real source of the problem, which is the coup that dragged the country towards its current humanitarian crisis, he stressed.

“We feel as if the priorities of the UN relief agencies are not the same as that of many Yemeni people. For example, attention has been greatly focused on the humanitarian issue, while ignoring the rehabilitation of state institutions. Restoring the functioning of these institutions is much more important than relief programs,” he declared.

Restoring them back to normal is part of a long-term solution, while relief programs are only temporary, Shiban said.

Another Yemeni social activist, Fayza al-Suleimani, stated: “Innovative solutions must be considered. State institutions should be supported because the local authorities are the main guarantors and they primarily play a role in building and sustaining the complete development system.”

“The humanitarian crisis emerged due to the absence of the state in Yemen and due to the Houthi coup,” she stressed.

Given these discrepant stances, Isnad was introduced to offer emergency aid and pave the way for a plan that would restore hope for Yemen.

The Isnad plan is more than just an offer for aid, but it is an innovation. The Arab Coalition is speaking about some 15,000 job opportunities that are offered in just one project related to roads.

Economic aid meanwhile started with a $2 billion grant for Yemen’s central bank and $1.5 billion for the UN. In addition, a relief bridge has been opened for around week.

It witnessed the delivery of aid to islands that had never dreamed of receiving such services or help, said Yemeni activists.

Saudi Ambassador to Yemen and Isnad CEO Mohammed al-Jaber explained that its humanitarian program is based on a “long-term plan that includes that encompasses the central bank and 17 safe passages that start from six main centers.”

He told Asharq Al-Awsat that with cooperation with the legitimate Yemeni government, passages for UN convoys can be opened any time they want and according to a schedule. The UN should coordinate with the Houthis if it wants to send aid to Houthi-controlled regions.

“We held two workshops with the UN through Isnad. The center seeks to support all international organizations, including the King Salman Humanitarian Aid and Relief Center,” he stressed.

Meanwhile, a western official in London stressed that Saudi Arabia understands the humanitarian situation in Yemen.

Asked to comment on the comprehensive humanitarian plan that was recently unveiled by the Arab Coalition, he said that the “humanitarian plan is good,” but Hodeidah needs to operate as a main port.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said that the port is currently operating at 70 percent of the capacity it was at in November.

The port was temporarily closed after the Houthis fired a ballistic missile against Riyadh.

A UN official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, deemed as “excellent” the plan on providing safe passage for aid delivery “should the Houthis respect it when the convoys pass through their territories.”

This also hinges of the monitoring UN agency and whether it is accurate in reporting violations.



The US and Iran Have Had Bitter Relations for Decades. After the Bombs, a New Chapter Begins

Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
TT
20

The US and Iran Have Had Bitter Relations for Decades. After the Bombs, a New Chapter Begins

Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
Iran's and US' flags are seen printed on paper in this illustration taken January 27, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

Now comes a new chapter in US-Iran relations, whether for the better or the even worse.

For nearly a half century, the world has witnessed an enmity for the ages — the threats, the plotting, the poisonous rhetoric between the “Great Satan” of Iranian lore and the “Axis of Evil” troublemaker of the Middle East, in America's eyes, The Associated Press reported.

Now we have a US president saying, of all things, “God bless Iran.”

This change of tone, however fleeting, came after the intense US bombing of Iranian nuclear-development sites this week, Iran's retaliatory yet restrained attack on a US military base in Qatar and the tentative ceasefire brokered by President Donald Trump in the Israel-Iran war.

The US attack on three targets inflicted serious damage but did not destroy them, a US intelligence report found, contradicting Trump's assertion that the attack “obliterated” Iran's nuclear program.

Here are some questions and answers about the long history of bad blood between the two countries:

Why did Trump offer blessings all around? In the first blush of a ceasefire agreement, even before Israel and Iran appeared to be fully on board, Trump exulted in the achievement. “God bless Israel,” he posted on social media. “God bless Iran.” He wished blessings on the Middle East, America and the world, too.

When it became clear that all hostilities had not immediately ceased after all, he took to swearing instead.

“We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the f— they’re doing,” he said on camera.

In that moment, Trump was especially critical of Israel, the steadfast US ally, for seeming less attached to the pause in fighting than the country that has been shouting “Death to America” for generations and is accused of trying to assassinate him.

Why did US-Iran relations sour in the first place? In two words, Operation Ajax.

That was the 1953 coup orchestrated by the CIA, with British support, that overthrew Iran's democratically elected government and handed power to the shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The Western powers had feared the rise of Soviet influence and the nationalization of Iran's oil industry.

The shah was a strategic US ally who repaired official relations with Washington. But grievances simmered among Iranians over his autocratic rule and his bowing to America's interests.

All of that boiled over in 1979 when the shah fled the country and the theocratic revolutionaries took control, imposing their own hard line.

How did the Iranian revolution deepen tensions? Profoundly.

On Nov. 4, 1979, with anti-American sentiment at a fever pitch, Iranian students took 66 American diplomats and citizens hostage and held more than 50 of them in captivity for 444 days.

It was a humiliating spectacle for the United States and President Jimmy Carter, who ordered a secret rescue mission months into the Iran hostage crisis. In Operation Eagle Claw, eight Navy helicopters and six Air Force transport planes were sent to rendezvous in the Iranian desert. A sand storm aborted the mission and eight service members died when a helicopter crashed into a C-120 refueling plane.

Diplomatic ties were severed in 1980 and remain broken.

Iran released the hostages minutes after Ronald Reagan's presidential inauguration on Jan. 20, 1981. That was just long enough to ensure that Carter, bogged in the crisis for over a year, would not see them freed in his term.

Was this week's US attack the first against Iran? No. But the last big one was at sea.

On April 18, 1988, the US Navy sank two Iranian ships, damaged another and destroyed two surveillance platforms in its largest surface engagement since World War II. Operation Praying Mantis was in retaliation against the mining of the USS Samuel B. Roberts in the Persian Gulf four days earlier. Ten sailors were injured and the explosion left a gaping hole in the hull.

Did the US take sides in the Iran-Iraq war? Not officially, but essentially.

The US provided economic aid, intelligence sharing and military-adjacent technology to Iraq, concerned that an Iranian victory would spread instability through the region and strain oil supplies. Iran and Iraq emerged from the 1980-1988 war with no clear victor and the loss of hundreds of thousands of lives, while US-Iraq relations fractured spectacularly in the years after.

What was the Iran-Contra affair? An example of US-Iran cooperation of sorts — an illegal, and secret, one until it wasn't.

Not long after the US designated Iran a state sponsor of terrorism in 1984 — a status that remains — it emerged that America was illicitly selling arms to Iran. One purpose was to win the release of hostages in Lebanon under the control of Iran-backed Hezbollah. The other was to raise secret money for the Contra rebels in Nicaragua in defiance of a US ban on supporting them.

President Ronald Reagan fumbled his way through the scandal but emerged unscathed — legally if not reputationally.

How many nations does the US designate as state sponsors of terrorism? Only four: Iran, North Korea, Cuba and Syria.

The designation makes those countries the target of broad sanctions. Syria's designation is being reviewed in light of the fall of Bashar Assad’s government.

Where did the term ‘Axis of Evil’ come from? From President George W. Bush in his 2002 State of the Union address. He spoke five months after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the year before he launched the invasion of Iraq on the wrong premise that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction.

He singled out Iran, North Korea and Saddam's Iraq and said: “States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.”

In response, Iran and some of its anti-American proxies and allies in the region took to calling their informal coalition an Axis of Resistance at times.

What about those proxies and allies? Some, like Hezbollah and Hamas, are degraded due to Israel's fierce and sustained assault on them. In Syria, Assad fled to safety in Moscow after losing power to opposition factions once tied to al-Qaida but now cautiously welcomed by Trump.

In Yemen, Houthi militants who have attacked commercial ships in the Red Sea and pledged common cause with Palestinians have been bombed by the US and Britain. In Iraq, armed Shia factions controlled or supported by Iran still operate and attract periodic attacks from the United States.

What about Iran's nuclear program? In 2015, President Barack Obama and other powers struck a deal with Iran to limit its nuclear development in return for the easing of sanctions. Iran agreed to get rid of an enriched uranium stockpile, dismantle most centrifuges and give international inspectors more access to see what it was doing.

Trump assailed the deal in his 2016 campaign and scrapped it two years later as president, imposing a "maximum pressure" campaign of sanctions. He argued the deal only delayed the development of nuclear weapons and did nothing to restrain Iran's aggression in the region. Iran's nuclear program resumed over time and, according to inspectors, accelerated in recent months.

Trump's exit from the nuclear deal brought a warning from Hassan Rouhani, then Iran's president, in 2018: “America must understand well that peace with Iran is the mother of all peace. And war with Iran is the mother of all wars.”

How did Trump respond to Iran's provocations? In January 2020, Trump ordered the drone strike that killed Qassem Soleimani, Iran's top commander, when he was in Iraq.

Then Iran came after him, according to President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland. Days after Trump won last year's election, the Justice Department filed charges against an Iranian man believed to still be in his country and two alleged associates in New York.

“The Justice Department has charged an asset of the Iranian regime who was tasked by the regime to direct a network of criminal associates to further Iran’s assassination plots against its targets, including President-elect Donald Trump," Garland said.

Now, Trump is seeking peace at the table after ordering bombs dropped on Iran, and offering blessings.

It is potentially the mother of all turnarounds.