Morocco Demands Partisan Representation, Steers Clear from National Council for Human Rights

Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)
Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)
TT

Morocco Demands Partisan Representation, Steers Clear from National Council for Human Rights

Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)
Morocco’s civil associations called for nonpartisan members at the National Council for Human Rights. (Reuters)

Morocco’s civil associations called on Tuesday for suspending a number of parliament members from the National Council for Human Rights to ensure its independence from political parties.

The government also backed the move put forth by human rights groups, after heated controversy broke as parliamentary majority parties insisted on introducing an amendment to article 35 of draft law No. 76.15 concerning the reorganization of the National Council for Human Rights.

A plenary session of the House of Representatives for ratification is expected to handle the amendment, which seeks to provide four parliamentarians with membership to the national human rights body, despite mounting opposition by the government and National Council for Human Rights itself.

The Moroccan Association of Human Rights (MAHR), alongside many other human rights groups, said they have followed with deep concern the debate on the bill in the House of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights Committee.

They cited special concern regarding the amendment proposed to article 35, where majority groups called for the representation of four parliamentarians within the Council.

Human rights groups said in a statement: “The membership of parliamentarians within the National Council for Human Rights diminishes the independence of the institution and the lack of partisan representation within the Council will strengthen its independence and credibility.”

Human rights organizations called for “the non-representation of lawmakers within the National Council for Human Rights, in order to protect the body’s full independence from political parties."

They explained that such impartiality is a position in line with the guidelines of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, which recommends that "national human rights institutions must remain independent, and to seek to establish relations with all parties and political factions while remaining uninvolved with partisan agendas.”

Opponents of the amendment also argued that lawmakers also becoming members of the National Council for Human Rights will put them in the position of dealing with “overlapping tasks.”



Independent Israeli Commission Blames Netanyahu and Others for October 2023 Attack

A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)
A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Independent Israeli Commission Blames Netanyahu and Others for October 2023 Attack

A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)
A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)

The independent civilian commission of inquiry into the October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel has found Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu directly responsible for the failures leading up to the attack, alongside former defense ministers, the army chief and the heads of the security services.

The civil commission presented its findings today after a four-month probe in which it heard some 120 witnesses. It was set up by relatives of victims of the Hamas attack, in response to the absence of any state probe.

The commission determined that the Israeli government, its army and security services “failed in their primary mission of protecting the citizens of Israel.”

It said Netanyahu was responsible for ignoring “repeated warnings” ahead of Oct. 7, 2023 for what it described as his appeasing approach over the years toward Hamas, and for “undermining all decision-making centers, including the cabinet and the National Security Council, in a way that prevented any serious discussion” on security issues.

The commission further determined that the military and defense leaders bear blame for ignoring warnings from within the army, and for reducing the army’s presence along the Gaza border while relying excessively on technological means.

On the day of the Hamas attack, the report says, the army’s response was both slow and lacking.

The civil commission called for the immediate establishment of a state commission of inquiry into the Oct. 7 attack.

Netanyahu has opposed launching a state commission of inquiry, arguing that such an investigation should begin only once the war is over.