Baghdad Holds Solution to Ending Economic Paralysis in Iraqi Kurdistan

The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)
The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)
TT

Baghdad Holds Solution to Ending Economic Paralysis in Iraqi Kurdistan

The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)
The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)

The Iraqi Kurdistan region witnessed during the past decade remarkable economic development in wake of the 2003 collapse of the former regime in Baghdad.

That period witnessed a period of prosperous trade with Iraq to reach tens of billions of dollars annually. The real estate sector in the region’s three provinces, most notably Irbil, witnessed a sharp rise in real estate prices, even exceeding those in the world’s most famous capitals.

Experts said that the economic boon could be attributed to the dozens of foreign and Arab investments that were attracted to the Kurdish market. They benefited from facilitations provided by the regional government, which included tax exemptions and property ownership rights.

This positive investment atmosphere helped boost the economy at the time and improve living conditions in the region by creating thousands of job opportunities, reviving the private sector and attracting foreign capital.

This consequently led private sector companies to limit their dependence on foreign labor.

This general revival in Iraqi Kurdistan however was followed with a gradual decline with mounting political disputes with Baghdad starting mid 2013.

This culminated with the Iraqi federal government’s decision in 2014 to completely cut Kurdistan’s share of the annual budget, said the regional government.

This was followed with Kurdistan’s war against the ISIS terrorist organization and the flow of refugees from Iraq and Syria that topped 2 million. This dealt a strong blow to the already fragile economy in the region.

This forced dozens of investment companies to quit the region within only two years. Hundreds of local firms also filed for bankruptcy amid a sharp rise in foreign debt that reached nearly 22 billion dollars, said parliamentary and semi-official sources from the region.

This was all coupled with the local government’s inability to pay pubic employee salaries, which it was forced to cut back by 75 percent since 2015. This weakened the individual’s purchasing power, especially since several citizens ran out of their savings.

As the economic crisis enters its fifth year, economy professor at the Catholic University in Irbil Dr. Salahaddin Kako told Asharq Al-Awsat that the primary cause for this poor situation is the government’s inability, for more than three years, to pay employee salaries.

In addition, he said that the purchasing power is determined by the level of a person’s income and the prices of goods in the market. The purchasing power will naturally decrease with the drop in salaries. He noted however that the prices of goods have remained stable and at times even dropped.

Kako explained that Kurdistan’s economy could be revived if the Iraqi federal government agreed to dispense public employee salaries, which will in turn improve living conditions.

Foreign debt, he said, can be paid through various means, such as proposing attractive investment opportunities.

An oil sector employee said that prior to the economic crisis in Kurdistan, he used to earn $1,200 a month, which allowed him and the five members of his family to live comfortably.

When the company he was working for decided to quit Kurdistan, he was left with a monthly salary of barely $200.

“I was no longer able to buy a kilogram of meat per month,” he lamented.

Many locals believe that key to ending the crisis lies in Baghdad’s hands and in resolving its pending disputes with Irbil.



Harris Tries to Thread the Needle on Gaza After Meeting with Netanyahu 

US Vice President Kamala Harris meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House grounds, in Washington, DC, US, July 25, 2024. (Reuters)
US Vice President Kamala Harris meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House grounds, in Washington, DC, US, July 25, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Harris Tries to Thread the Needle on Gaza After Meeting with Netanyahu 

US Vice President Kamala Harris meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House grounds, in Washington, DC, US, July 25, 2024. (Reuters)
US Vice President Kamala Harris meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House grounds, in Washington, DC, US, July 25, 2024. (Reuters)

Vice President Kamala Harris, the likely Democratic nominee for president, is attempting to bridge divides within the party over the war in Gaza, emphasizing Israel's right to defend itself while also focusing on alleviating Palestinian suffering.

She delivered remarks after meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday that reflected a delicate balancing act on one of the country's most divisive political issues. Some Democrats have been critical of President Joe Biden's steadfast support for Israel despite the increasing death toll among Palestinians, and Harris is trying to unite her party for the election battle with Republican candidate Donald Trump.

"We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies," she said. "We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering. And I will not be silent."

Harris did not deviate from the administration's approach to the conflict, including grueling negotiations aimed at ending the fighting, releasing hostages held by Hamas and eventually rebuilding Gaza. She also said nothing about military assistance for Israel, which some Democrats want to cut.

Instead, she tried to refocus the conversation around mitigating the calamity in Gaza, and she used language intended to nudge Americans toward an elusive middle ground.

"The war in Gaza is not a binary issue," she said. "But too often, the conversation is binary when the reality is anything but."

In addition, Harris made a more explicit appeal to voters who have been frustrated by the ceaseless bloodshed, which began when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7.

"To everyone who has been calling for a ceasefire, and to everyone who yearns for peace, I see you, and I hear you," she said.

Harris' meeting with Netanyahu was private, and she described it as "frank and constructive." She also emphasized her longtime support for Israel, which includes raising money to plant trees in the country when she was a young girl.

Jewish Americans traditionally lean Democratic, but Republicans have tried to make inroads. Trump claimed this week that Harris "is totally against the Jewish people" because she didn't attend Netanyahu's address to a joint meeting of Congress. The vice president was traveling in Indiana during the speech.

Harris is married to a Jewish man, Doug Emhoff, who has played an outspoken role in the administration's efforts to combat antisemitism.

Netanyahu did not speak publicly after his meeting with Harris. His trip was scheduled before Biden dropped his reelection bid, but the meeting with Harris was watched closely for clues to her views on Israel.

"She is in a tricky situation and walking a tightrope where she’s still the vice president and the president really is the one who leads on the foreign policy agenda," said Dearborn Mayor Abdullah Hammoud, a Democrat whose city is home to one of the largest Arab American communities in the nation. "But as the candidate, the presumptive nominee, she has to now create the space to differentiate in order for her to chart a new course."

Protesters gathered outside Union Station on the day of Netanyahu's speech, ripping down American flags and spray painting "Hamas is coming."

Harris sharply criticized those actions, saying there were "despicable acts by unpatriotic protesters and dangerous hate-fueled rhetoric. "

"I support the right to peacefully protest, but let’s be clear: Antisemitism, hate and violence of any kind have no place in our nation," she said in a statement.

As vice president, Harris has tried to show little daylight between herself and Biden. But David Rothkopf, a foreign policy writer who has met with her, said there's been "a noticeable difference in tone, particularly in regards to concern for the plight of innocent Palestinians."

The difference was on display in Selma, Alabama, in March, when Harris commemorated the anniversary of the Bloody Sunday march for voting rights in 1965.

During her speech, Harris said that "given the immense scale of suffering in Gaza, there must be an immediate ceasefire."

The audience broke out in applause. A few sentences later, Harris emphasized that it was up to Hamas to accept the deal that had been offered. But her demand for a ceasefire still resonated in ways that Biden's comments had not.

An AP-NORC poll conducted in June found that about 6 in 10 Democrats disapproved of the way Biden is handling the conflict between the Israelis and the Palestinians. Roughly the same number said Israel's military response in Gaza had gone too far.

Israeli analysts said they doubted that Harris would present a dramatic shift in policies toward their country.

Chuck Freilich, a former Israeli deputy national security adviser and senior fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies, a Tel Aviv think tank, said Harris was from a generation of American politicians who felt they could both support Israel and publicly criticize its policies.

"The question is as president, what would she do?" Freilich said. "I think she would put considerably more pressure on Israel on the Palestinian issue overall."