Baghdad Holds Solution to Ending Economic Paralysis in Iraqi Kurdistan

The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)
The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)
TT

Baghdad Holds Solution to Ending Economic Paralysis in Iraqi Kurdistan

The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)
The economy in Iraqi Kurdistan has suffered due to ongoing political disputes with Baghdad. (Reuters)

The Iraqi Kurdistan region witnessed during the past decade remarkable economic development in wake of the 2003 collapse of the former regime in Baghdad.

That period witnessed a period of prosperous trade with Iraq to reach tens of billions of dollars annually. The real estate sector in the region’s three provinces, most notably Irbil, witnessed a sharp rise in real estate prices, even exceeding those in the world’s most famous capitals.

Experts said that the economic boon could be attributed to the dozens of foreign and Arab investments that were attracted to the Kurdish market. They benefited from facilitations provided by the regional government, which included tax exemptions and property ownership rights.

This positive investment atmosphere helped boost the economy at the time and improve living conditions in the region by creating thousands of job opportunities, reviving the private sector and attracting foreign capital.

This consequently led private sector companies to limit their dependence on foreign labor.

This general revival in Iraqi Kurdistan however was followed with a gradual decline with mounting political disputes with Baghdad starting mid 2013.

This culminated with the Iraqi federal government’s decision in 2014 to completely cut Kurdistan’s share of the annual budget, said the regional government.

This was followed with Kurdistan’s war against the ISIS terrorist organization and the flow of refugees from Iraq and Syria that topped 2 million. This dealt a strong blow to the already fragile economy in the region.

This forced dozens of investment companies to quit the region within only two years. Hundreds of local firms also filed for bankruptcy amid a sharp rise in foreign debt that reached nearly 22 billion dollars, said parliamentary and semi-official sources from the region.

This was all coupled with the local government’s inability to pay pubic employee salaries, which it was forced to cut back by 75 percent since 2015. This weakened the individual’s purchasing power, especially since several citizens ran out of their savings.

As the economic crisis enters its fifth year, economy professor at the Catholic University in Irbil Dr. Salahaddin Kako told Asharq Al-Awsat that the primary cause for this poor situation is the government’s inability, for more than three years, to pay employee salaries.

In addition, he said that the purchasing power is determined by the level of a person’s income and the prices of goods in the market. The purchasing power will naturally decrease with the drop in salaries. He noted however that the prices of goods have remained stable and at times even dropped.

Kako explained that Kurdistan’s economy could be revived if the Iraqi federal government agreed to dispense public employee salaries, which will in turn improve living conditions.

Foreign debt, he said, can be paid through various means, such as proposing attractive investment opportunities.

An oil sector employee said that prior to the economic crisis in Kurdistan, he used to earn $1,200 a month, which allowed him and the five members of his family to live comfortably.

When the company he was working for decided to quit Kurdistan, he was left with a monthly salary of barely $200.

“I was no longer able to buy a kilogram of meat per month,” he lamented.

Many locals believe that key to ending the crisis lies in Baghdad’s hands and in resolving its pending disputes with Irbil.



Biden’s Legacy: Far-Reaching Accomplishments That Didn’t Translate into Political Support

US President Joe Biden waves while boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on November 1, 2022. (AFP)
US President Joe Biden waves while boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on November 1, 2022. (AFP)
TT

Biden’s Legacy: Far-Reaching Accomplishments That Didn’t Translate into Political Support

US President Joe Biden waves while boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on November 1, 2022. (AFP)
US President Joe Biden waves while boarding Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland on November 1, 2022. (AFP)

Sitting in the Oval Office behind the iconic Resolute desk in 2022, an animated President Joe Biden described the challenge of leading a psychologically traumatized nation.

The United States had endured a life-altering pandemic. There was a jarring burst of inflation and now global conflict with Russia invading Ukraine, as well as the persistent threat to democracy he felt Donald Trump posed.

How could Biden possibly heal that collective trauma?

“Be confident,” he said emphatically in an interview with The Associated Press. “Be confident. Because I am confident.”

But in the ensuing two years, the confidence Biden hoped to instill steadily waned. And when the 81-year-old Democratic president showed his age in a disastrous debate in June against Trump, he lost the benefit of the doubt as well. That triggered a series of events that led him Sunday to step down as his party's nominee for the November's election.

Democrats, who had been united in their resolve to prevent another Trump term, suddenly fractured. And Republicans, beset by chaos in Congress and the former president’s criminal conviction, improbably coalesced in defiant unity.

Biden never figured out how to inspire the world’s most powerful country to believe in itself, let alone in him.

He lost the confidence of supporters in the 90-minute debate with Trump, even if pride initially prompted him to override the fears of lawmakers, party elders and donors who were nudging him to drop out. Then Trump survived an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania and, as if on cue, pumped his fist in strength. Biden, while campaigning in Las Vegas, tested positive for the coronavirus Wednesday and retreated to his Delaware beach home to recover.

The events over the course of three weeks led to an exit Biden never wanted, but one that Democrats felt they needed to maximize their chance of winning in November’s elections.

Biden seems to have badly misread the breadth of his support. While many Democrats had deep admiration for the president personally, they did not have the same affection for him politically.

Rice University historian Douglas Brinkley said Biden arrived as a reprieve from a nation exhausted by Trump and the pandemic, reported The Associated Press.

“He was a perfect person for that moment,” said Brinkley, noting Biden proved in era of polarization that bipartisan lawmaking was still possible.

Yet, there was never a “Joe Biden Democrat” like there was a “Reagan Republican.” He did not have adoring, movement-style followers as did Barack Obama or John F. Kennedy. He was not a generational candidate like Bill Clinton. The only barrier-breaking dimension to his election was the fact that he was the oldest person ever elected president.

His first run for the White House, in the 1988 cycle, ended with self-inflicted wounds stemming from plagiarism, and he didn’t make it to the first nominating contest. In 2008, he dropped out after the Iowa caucuses, where he won less than 1% of the vote.

In 2016, Obama counseled his vice president not to run. A Biden victory in 2020 seemed implausible, when he finished fourth in Iowa and fifth in New Hampshire before a dramatic rebound in South Carolina that propelled him to the nomination and the White House.

David Axelrod, a former senior adviser to Obama who also worked closely with Biden, said that history would treat Biden kinder than voters had, not just because of his legislative achievements but because in 2020 he defeated Trump.

“His legacy is significant beyond all his many accomplishments,” Axelrod said. “He will always be the man who stepped up and defeated a president who placed himself above our democracy."

But Biden could not avoid his age. And when he showed frailty in his steps and his speech, there was no foundation of supporters that could stand by him to stop calls for him to step aside.

It was a humbling end to a half-century career in politics, yet hardly reflective of the full legacy of his time in the White House.

In March of 2021, Biden launched $1.9 trillion in pandemic aid, creating a series of new programs that temporarily halved child poverty, halted evictions and contributed to the addition of 15.7 million jobs. But inflation began to rise shortly thereafter as Biden’s approval rating as measured by the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research fell from 61% to 39% as of June.

He followed up with a series of executive actions to unsnarl global supply chains and a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure package that not only replaced aging infrastructure but improved internet access and prepared communities to withstand the damages from climate change.

In 2022, Biden and his fellow Democrats followed up with two measures that reinvigorated the future of US manufacturing.

The CHIPS and Science Act provided $52 billion to build factories and create institutions to make computer chips domestically, ensuring that the US would have access to the most advanced semiconductors needed to power economic growth and maintain national security. There was also the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided incentives to shift away from fossil fuels and enabled Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

Biden also sought to compete more aggressively with China, rebuild alliances such as NATO and completed the US withdrawal from Afghanistan that resulted in the death of 13 US service members.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in early 2022 worsened inflation as Trump and other Republicans questioned the value of military aid to the Ukrainians.

Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023 attack in Israel sparked a war that showed divisions within the Democratic party about whether the United States should continue to support Israel as tens of thousands of Palestinians died in months of counterattacks. The president was also criticized over illegal border crossings at the southern border with Mexico.

Yet it was the size of the stakes and the fear of a Biden loss that prevailed, resulting in a bet by Democrats that the tasks he began could best be completed by a younger generation.

“History will be kinder to him than voters were at the end,” Axelrod said.