Intel Introduces New Smart Glasses

Intel develops the “Vaunt” smart glasses. (Reuters)
Intel develops the “Vaunt” smart glasses. (Reuters)
TT

Intel Introduces New Smart Glasses

Intel develops the “Vaunt” smart glasses. (Reuters)
Intel develops the “Vaunt” smart glasses. (Reuters)

Intel has developed a pair of smart glasses that won't make you look like a hopeless geek. The new glasses, dubbed “Vaunt”, are still in the prototype phase. They look like ordinary glasses, with a faint, red glimmer that occasionally appears on the right lens.

Information sent to the glasses appear to be displayed on a screen but in reality is beamed to the retina of a wearer's eye. In a review published in The Verge, Dieter Bohn wrote: “The prototypes I wore in December also felt virtually indistinguishable from regular glasses. They come in several styles, work with prescriptions, and can be worn comfortably all day”.

Constant Focus

Vaunt uses Bluetooth and is designed to work with a smartphone, much as smartwatches do. A very low-powered laser (VCSEL) shines a red monochrome image at around 400 x 150 pixels onto a holographic reflector on the right lens of the glasses. That image is sent to the back of the eyeball, directly to the retina. Because the image is sent directly to the retina, it's always in focus, which is why the system works on both prescription and non-prescription glasses.

In his review, Bohn said that the Intel prototype did not have a microphone, however, he expected that future models may have one that would enable them to interact with artificial intelligence software like Amazon's Alexa, Google's Assistant or Apple's Siri.

He also revealed that Intel will be launching an early access program for developers later this year, so they can start experimenting with things the glasses might be able to do.

Limited Capacities

While you may not stick out in a crowd wearing Vaunt, you're not going to overwhelm anyone with its power, either. Eric Abbruzzese, a senior analyst at ABI Research commented on Intel’s new innovation saying that the new glasses has no camera, touchpad, or microphone.

Humble applications: Abbruzzese explained during an interview with TechNewsWorld: “That means these are only going to serve the simplest applications, mainly around notifications, navigation, step-by-step instruction, and personal notifications.”

For her part, Kristen Hanich, an analyst at Parks Associates said: “It's a pretty light-touch device, so it mostly allows users to see contextual information such as notifications from phones, map directions, recipes, shopping lists and such.”

Augmented reality devices like Vaunt have been used in settings such as manufacturing, logistics and healthcare, Hanich noted. However, a lot of those applications are being driven by more powerful devices such as Google Glass and Microsoft's HoloLens that have the ability to see what's directly in front of the user.

However, Vaunt’s potential to attract the regular consumer may not be an easy task. Experts see that it hasn't solved one of Google Glass' primary downfalls, which was lack of valuable use cases for consumers.

Hanich said that consumers will have to be sold on the value of Vaunt, but that sell will be easier if the price is right. If it's priced similar to a smart watch, then there'll be some potential there, she noted.

Not a Gamer choice. Gaming is one area that's attracted consumer interest in virtual reality and augmented reality devices, but Vaunt isn't likely to make much headway in that market. "The device is too simplistic for any visually intensive applications," Abbruzzese said.

Power is another issue for Vaunt. Hanich noted that the glasses don't have cameras, or a lot of processing ability, or the ability to display data in any color besides red. “Something like Pokémon Go may work on them, but developers will have to sacrifice graphics and the ability to display an object in sync with the terrain," she explained.

However, there are some advantages of not having a camera. Hanich said: “Part of the backlash against Google Glass was that the glasses were so conspicuous, including a visible camera. Without a camera, Vaunt has few problems in terms of privacy."

Futuristic Market

Although devices like Vaunt are creating a buzz now, it likely will be a year or two before AR glasses make it to the mass market. ABI predicted that the inflection point for consumer AR headgear likely will be in the late 2019-early 2020 time frame. Abbruzzese considered that it really requires strong brands and marketing to push AR glasses to the masses. Apple has such a brand, and it is rumored to have a pair of AR specs in the works.

Abbruzzese noted that Vaunt isn't likely to have that sort of impact, but they can be an important bridge between the consumer-side disappointments of Google Glass to a more realistic consumer AR market.

Brian Blau, a research director at Gartner said that Vaunt is a clear sign that wearable display technology is quickly advancing.

Talking to TechNewsWorld, he added that the new glasses represent a form factor that any technology provider would see as a great next step, as it's one that isn't that different from a typical pair of eyeglasses.”

Blau concluded that “we still have some years before smart glasses like Vaunt arrive in consumers’ hands, but it's great to see these early prototypes as they get brands and businesses interested in smart glasses, even at this early stage of their development.”



NASA Downplays Role in Development of Titan Submersible that Imploded

(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)
(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)
TT

NASA Downplays Role in Development of Titan Submersible that Imploded

(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)
(FILES) This undated image courtesy of OceanGate Expeditions, shows their Titan submersible beginning a descent. (Photo by Handout / OceanGate Expeditions / AFP)

OceanGate co-founder Stockton Rush said the carbon fiber hull used in an experimental submersible that imploded en route to the wreckage of the Titanic was developed with help of NASA and aerospace manufacturers, but a NASA official testified Thursday that the space agency actually had little involvement at all.
OceanGate and NASA partnered in 2020 with NASA planning to play a role in building and testing the carbon fiber hull. But the COVID-19 pandemic prevented NASA from fulfilling its role, other than providing some consulting on an early mockup, not the ultimate carbon fiber hull that was used for people, said Justin Jackson, a materials engineer for NASA.
“We provided remote consultations throughout the build of their one third scale article, but we did not do any manufacturing or testing of their cylinders,” The Associated Press quoted Jackson as saying.
At one point, Jackson said NASA declined to allow its name to be invoked in a news release by OceanGate. “The language they were using was getting too close to us endorsing, so our folks had some heartburn with the endorsement level of it,” he told a Coast Guard panel that’s investigating the tragedy.
Rush was among the five people who died when the submersible imploded in June 2023. The design of the company's Titan submersible has been the source of scrutiny since the disaster.
The Coast Guard opened a public hearing earlier this month that is part of a high level investigation into the cause of the implosion. Some of the testimony has focused on the troubled nature of the company.
In addition to Jackson, Thursday's testimony was to include Mark Negley of Boeing Co.; John Winters of Coast Guard Sector Puget Sound; and Lt. Cmdr. Jonathan Duffett of the Coast Guard Office of Commercial Vessel Compliance.
Earlier in the hearing, former OceanGate operations director David Lochridge said he frequently clashed with Rush and felt the company was committed only to making money. “The whole idea behind the company was to make money,” Lochridge testified. “There was very little in the way of science.”
Lochridge and other previous witnesses painted a picture of a company that was impatient to get its unconventionally designed craft into the water. The accident set off a worldwide debate about the future of private undersea exploration.
The hearing is expected to run through Friday and include more witnesses.
The co-founder of the company told the Coast Guard panel Monday that he hoped a silver lining of the disaster is that it will inspire a renewed interest in exploration, including the deepest waters of the world’s oceans. Businessman Guillermo Sohnlein, who helped found OceanGate with Rush, ultimately left the company before the Titan disaster.
“This can’t be the end of deep ocean exploration. This can’t be the end of deep-diving submersibles and I don’t believe that it will be,” Sohnlein said.
Coast Guard officials noted at the start of the hearing that the submersible had not been independently reviewed, as is standard practice. That and Titan’s unusual design subjected it to scrutiny in the undersea exploration community.
OceanGate, based in Washington state, suspended its operations after the implosion. The company has no full-time employees currently, but has been represented by an attorney during the hearing.
During the submersible’s final dive on June 18, 2023, the crew lost contact after an exchange of texts about Titan’s depth and weight as it descended. The support ship Polar Prince then sent repeated messages asking if Titan could still see the ship on its onboard display.
One of the last messages from Titan’s crew to Polar Prince before the submersible imploded stated, “all good here,” according to a visual re-creation presented earlier in the hearing.
When the submersible was reported overdue, rescuers rushed ships, planes and other equipment to an area about 435 miles (700 kilometers) south of St. John’s, Newfoundland. Wreckage of the Titan was subsequently found on the ocean floor about 330 yards (300 meters) off the bow of the Titanic, Coast Guard officials said. No one on board survived.
OceanGate said it has been fully cooperating with the Coast Guard and NTSB investigations since they began. Titan had been making voyages to the Titanic wreckage site going back to 2021.