Lebanese Parliament Speaker ‘Pessimistic’ on Govt. Formation Prospects

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. (NNA)
Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. (NNA)
TT

Lebanese Parliament Speaker ‘Pessimistic’ on Govt. Formation Prospects

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. (NNA)
Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. (NNA)

Lebanese parliament Speaker Nabih Berri expressed on Saturday his pessimism over the prospects that a new government will be formed soon amid the ongoing disputes between the rival Christian parties of the Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) and Lebanese Forces (LF) over the distribution of portfolios.

Five months after parliamentary elections were held, Berri said that the process of forming a new government returned “to zero”.

"We have gone back to zero," Berri told Lebanese newspaper al-Akhbar. "There had been signs of a resolution, but after yesterday's statements I have become pessimistic."

Throughout these five months, there has been no sign of the concessions sought by Prime Minister-designate Saad al-Hariri that would enable the formation of a unity government that can get to work on badly needed economic reforms.

Politicians are warning that Lebanon faces an economic crisis.

On Friday the Christian parties clashed over how power should be divided in the government, casting doubt over Hariri's prediction on Thursday that an agreement would be reached soon.

Caretaker Foreign Minister and head of the FPM Jebran Bassil set on Friday a new condition for the government formation by proposing that each parliamentary bloc be granted one minister for every five seats won in the May elections.

His new standard would allow his parliamentary bloc to take six ministers in the new cabinet, in return of only three to the LF.

The LF rejected the new conditions and said Bassil was not responsible for forming the new cabinet.

“The only standard we will follow is the popular one, which allows us to receive one third of Christian ministers,” it added.



UN General Assembly Asks Court to Say What Israel Needs to Provide in Gaza

The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File
The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File
TT

UN General Assembly Asks Court to Say What Israel Needs to Provide in Gaza

The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File
The UN General Assembly often finds itself taking up measures that cannot get through the Security Council due to political concerns. JOHN ANGELILLO / POOL/AFP/File

The UN General Assembly approved a resolution Thursday asking the UN’s highest court to state what Israel’s obligations are in Gaza and the West Bank to provide humanitarian assistance essential for the survival of Palestinian civilians.
The vote on the Norwegian-sponsored resolution seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice was 137-12, with 22 abstentions. The United States, Israel's closest ally, voted against the resolution.
Resolutions in the 193-member General Assembly are not legally binding, though they do reflect world opinion, The Associated Press said.
It follows the ICJ’s condemnation of Israel’ s rule over lands it captured 57 years ago. In a nonbinding opinion in July, the court said Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territories is unlawful and called on Israel to end its occupation and halt settlement construction immediately.
Thursday's resolution also follows Israeli laws passed in late October, which take effect in 90 days, that effectively ban the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, known as UNRWA, from operating in the Palestinian territories.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has stressed that no other UN agency can take on UNRWA's role, and a UN spokesman reiterated Thursday that under international law, as the occupying power, Israel would be responsible for fulfilling the basic needs of Palestinians if UNRWA is banned.
Norway’s deputy foreign minister, Andreas Kravik, told reporters that the international community has a responsibility to react to tens of thousands of deaths in Gaza and virtually the entire population experiencing acute hunger, and some near famine.
He said many countries, the UN and its agencies, and aid organizations are ready to step up their humanitarian efforts but the problem is “there’s a lack of access.”
Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon told the assembly before the vote that its members were debating “the same recycled nonsense, where all that matters is attacking Israel and challenge its right to protect its citizens.”
“This time the Palestinians are using a new tool in this diplomatic circus: the International Court of Justice,” he said.
The resolution demands that Israel comply with all its legal obligations under international law, including by the UN's top court.
It expresses concern about the Israeli legislation on UNRWA and Israeli measures to impede assistance to the Palestinians.
The resolution seeks the ICJ’s guidance on additional questions about its July ruling, including what Israel's obligations are “to ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently needed supplies essential to the survival of the Palestinian civilian population.”