Damascus National Museum Partly Reopened after 7-Year Shutdown

Damascus National Museum reopening to visitors. AFP
Damascus National Museum reopening to visitors. AFP
TT
20

Damascus National Museum Partly Reopened after 7-Year Shutdown

Damascus National Museum reopening to visitors. AFP
Damascus National Museum reopening to visitors. AFP

The Damascus National Museum opened its doors, for the first time in almost seven years, after it had closed to protect antiquities from the repercussions of the conflict ravaging Syria since 2011.

Last year, the Directorate General of Antiquities and Museums announced retrieving over 78 missing artifacts found in Lebanon, in addition to about 20 Maaloula mosaic plates that will be put on display at the museum.

Maaloula is known as one of three remaining villages where Western Neo-Aramaic is spoken and is home to two important monasteries: the Eastern Catholic Mar Sarkis and Greek Orthodox Mar Thecla.

Only a single wing of the museum was opened, but it displayed archaeological artifacts dating to several historical periods that were hidden during the past years.

The Damascus National Museum, which was founded in early 1920 and moved to its current building in 1936, consists of several sections, including prehistoric monuments, ancient Syrian monuments, classical monuments, Islamic monuments and modern art.

During the years of the war, the Syrian archaeological sites were subjected to vandalism and looting despite The International Council of Museums (ICOM) publishing an “Emergency Red List of Syrian Cultural Objects at Risk” that could turn up on the international art market.

For its part, the Directorate undertook emergency measures, including the transfer of valuable artifacts and rare pieces from Damascus and Aleppo museums to a safe area, and provided security insurance for the remaining pieces at warehouses.

Syria was inhabited by many civilizations from the Canaanites to the Ottomans, and has treasures of Roman, Mamluk and Byzantine ruins, with mosques, churches and Crusader castles.

Since the conflict in 2011, archeological sites have not escaped destruction, vandalism and robbery.

The most prominent of these is the Aleppo Citadel and the ruins of Palmyra, such as the Temple of Bell, the Arc de Triomphe and the Lion of Latt.

The number of stolen and smuggled artifacts was estimated at 25,000, which were listed by ICOM.

According to the information, most of these pieces are registered and known to the Directorate of Antiquities, and can be retrieved. But a challenge rises when dealing with unregistered artifacts stolen for depots. Most unlisted pieces were illegally excavated in untouched archaeological sites throughout Syria.



These Canadian Rocks May Be the Oldest on Earth

A close-up view of metagabbroic rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt in Nunavik, Quebec, Canada, that are 4.16 billion years old is seen in this photograph released on June 26, 2025. (Jonathan O'Neil/Handout via Reuters)
A close-up view of metagabbroic rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt in Nunavik, Quebec, Canada, that are 4.16 billion years old is seen in this photograph released on June 26, 2025. (Jonathan O'Neil/Handout via Reuters)
TT
20

These Canadian Rocks May Be the Oldest on Earth

A close-up view of metagabbroic rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt in Nunavik, Quebec, Canada, that are 4.16 billion years old is seen in this photograph released on June 26, 2025. (Jonathan O'Neil/Handout via Reuters)
A close-up view of metagabbroic rocks from the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt in Nunavik, Quebec, Canada, that are 4.16 billion years old is seen in this photograph released on June 26, 2025. (Jonathan O'Neil/Handout via Reuters)

Scientists have identified what could be the oldest rocks on Earth from a rock formation in Canada.

The Nuvvuagittuq Greenstone Belt has long been known for its ancient rocks — plains of streaked gray stone on the eastern shore of Hudson Bay in Quebec. But researchers disagree on exactly how old they are.

Work from two decades ago suggested the rocks could be 4.3 billion years old, placing them in the earliest period of Earth's history. But other scientists using a different dating method contested the finding, arguing that long-ago contaminants were skewing the rocks' age and that they were actually slightly younger at 3.8 billion years old.

In the new study, researchers sampled a different section of rock from the belt and estimated its age using the previous two dating techniques — measuring how one radioactive element decays into another over time. The result: The rocks were about 4.16 billion years old.

The different methods "gave exactly the same age,” said study author Jonathan O'Neil with the University of Ottawa.

The new research was published Thursday in the journal Science.

Earth formed about 4.5 billion years ago from a collapsing cloud of dust and gas soon after the solar system existed. Primordial rocks often get melted and recycled by Earth's moving tectonic plates, making them extremely rare on the surface today. Scientists have uncovered 4 billion-year-old rocks from another formation in Canada called the Acasta Gneiss Complex, but the Nuvvuagittuq rocks could be even older.

Studying rocks from Earth's earliest history could give a glimpse into how the planet may have looked — how its roiling magma oceans gave way to tectonic plates — and even how life got started.

“To have a sample of what was going on on Earth way back then is really valuable,” said Mark Reagan with the University of Iowa, who studies volcanic rocks and lava and was not involved with the new study.

The rock formation is on tribal Inukjuak lands and the local Inuit community has temporarily restricted scientists from taking samples from the site due to damage from previous visits.

After some geologists visited the site, large chunks of rock were missing and the community noticed pieces for sale online, said Tommy Palliser, who manages the land with the Pituvik Landholding Corp. The Inuit community wants to work with scientists to set up a provincial park that would protect the land while allowing researchers to study it.

“There's a lot of interest for these rocks, which we understand,” said Palliser, a member of the community. “We just don't want any more damage.”