Ankara Vows Retaliation against Syrian Regime Attacks on Turkish Observation Posts

Fighters of National Army, backed by Turkey, stand at a back of a truck in the city of al-Bab, Syria August 5, 2018. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
Fighters of National Army, backed by Turkey, stand at a back of a truck in the city of al-Bab, Syria August 5, 2018. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
TT
20

Ankara Vows Retaliation against Syrian Regime Attacks on Turkish Observation Posts

Fighters of National Army, backed by Turkey, stand at a back of a truck in the city of al-Bab, Syria August 5, 2018. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi
Fighters of National Army, backed by Turkey, stand at a back of a truck in the city of al-Bab, Syria August 5, 2018. REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi

Ankara warned neighboring Damascus that regime forces assaulting any Turkish observation posts set up in Syria’s northern Idlib province would be unacceptable.

Moscow and Tehran, both regime backers, were also asked to reign in Syrian army forces attacking Turkish assets in the war-torn Middle Eastern country.

According to the Defense Ministry, Turkey's 10th observation post was "deliberately" targeted in a recent mortar attack in which three soldiers were wounded.

Foreign Minister Mevlüt Cavusoglu confirmed that “Turkey won’t tolerate Syrian regime harassment of its soldiers,” just hours after an attack occurred. He stressed that Ankara “will teach them their place,” but that essentially it is the responsibility of Russia and Iran to halt the attacks.

Speaking during his visit to the southern Turkish province of Hatay, which is near borders with Syria, Cavusoglu held Russia and Iran responsible for regime actions based on arrangements achieved at the trilateral Syria peace talks held in the Kazakh capital, Astana.

Contrary to Russia and Iran, who act as backers of the Syrian regime, Turkey presents itself as a guarantor for opposition armed factions at the Astana sessions.

“At that point, stopping the regime is the responsibility of Russia and Iran, which we have been working with closely in Syria, so far. They are both guarantors of the regime in the political process and according to commitments on the ground,” Cavusoglu said.

Earlier Sunday, Syrian regime forces attacked a Turkish observation post in Idlib with no casualties; Turkey retaliated with heavy weapons, the Defense Ministry said in a statement.

Regime forces have repeatedly targeted Turkish observation posts in de-escalation zones in Idlib and Hama provinces in north and central Syria.

Ankara, therefore, considered the recent attack a breach of the Sochi agreement with Russia, which established a buffer zone to protect Idlib’s armed opposition factions from regime offensives—it was reached last September between Ankara and Moscow.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for his part, vowed Turkey would retaliate against Syrian regime attacks against its assets in Syria.



Iraq Reiterates Need for Int’l Coalition Forces to Remain

A convoy of US forces seen on the border between Syria and Iraq. (Reuters file)
A convoy of US forces seen on the border between Syria and Iraq. (Reuters file)
TT
20

Iraq Reiterates Need for Int’l Coalition Forces to Remain

A convoy of US forces seen on the border between Syria and Iraq. (Reuters file)
A convoy of US forces seen on the border between Syria and Iraq. (Reuters file)

Iraq’s security and defense committee announced on Sunday that “the need still stands” for the US-led anti-ISIS international coalition to remain in the country.

It made its announcement days after Defense Minister Thabet al-Abbasi made similar remarks.

In televised statements, he stressed that the international troops were still needed in Syria, adding that “Iraq and Syria’s security are indivisible.”

Security and military coordination with the coalition continues, he said.

Baghdad has not received any official notice about the withdrawal of the forces from Syria or Iraq, he revealed.

Iraq had in 2024 held three rounds of dialogue with the United States about organizing the presence of the coalition after the completion of the pullout of remaining American forces.

Pro-Iran factions in Iraq, which had for years demanded the withdrawal, have so far not commented on the latest statements about the coalition.

Abbasi added that the American and coalition forces were necessary in Syria to maintain the fight against ISIS remnants, which continue to be a cross-border threat.

The US Defense Department recently said that American troop movement from northern and eastern Syria to more secure locations in Iraq was part of a calculated, safe and professional redeployment plan aimed at consolidating the successes against ISIS and cementing regional stability.

It does not mean the end of the coalition’s mission in Syria, it added.

A Pentagon official said local partners remain in the field in Syria and are an effective force against ISIS.

The US will continue to empower those partners in performing most of their remaining counter-terrorism duties, including guarding ISIS detainees, he went on to say.

ISIS is seeking to exploit any instability in the area, but the US efforts to deter its resurgence cannot be underestimated. The coalition remains committed to achieving the permanent defeat of ISIS in Syria and Iraq, he vowed.

Member of the security and defense committee Yasser Iskander Watout said on Sunday that Iraq needs major logistic and aerial support since the means at its disposal were not enough to control borders with neighbors.

The continued deployment of the international coalition forces is “necessary and realistic”, he said.

The Interior Ministry and border and security forces have secured the border with Syria, but members of the committee said the need remains for aerial support to bolster stability in the area, he revealed.

Watout agreed with Abbasi on the need for the international forces to remain given that it boasts air forces that have effectively secured Iraq’s skies.

He noted that recent government contracts for the purchase of 14 modern jets “were not enough to cover all our needs.”

The coalition currently has 2,500 forces deployed in Iraq to counter ISIS and offer Iraqi forces logistic support.

Pro-Iran factions that have long been opposed to the international troops have not commented on the recent statements on their continued deployment given the Israeli threats against Tehran and US President Donald Trump’s urging of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against carrying out attacks against the factions themselves.