Morocco: Joining AfCFTA is Not Recognition of Polisario

Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. (Getty Images file photo)
Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. (Getty Images file photo)
TT

Morocco: Joining AfCFTA is Not Recognition of Polisario

Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. (Getty Images file photo)
Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. (Getty Images file photo)

Morocco’s accession to the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) does not imply a “recognition” of an entity that poses a threat to its territorial integrity and national unity, announced Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita.

He made his remarks in reference to the “Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic” that was unilaterally declared by the separatist Polisario Front.

Speaking to the press at the conclusion of 12th Extraordinary Summit of the African Union in Niamey, Bourita said Morocco was strongly involved in establishing the AfCFTA, but its ratification of the agreement cannot be interpreted as an “acknowledgment” of the Polisario.

Rabat was acting according to a clear doctrine and principles in differentiating between membership in an organization and the recognition of entities that could be part of it, but which Morocco does not recognize, he continued.

He wondered how an entity that has no territory could belong to a free trade area. He said that if it wanted to carry out trade from Tinduf city, then it will be considered as internal trade within Algeria, another member of the AU.

Referring to the situation as an “obvious aberration”, he also wondered which currency it will use to perform its operations.

Separately, Bourita noted that AfCFTA is fully in line with the vision of King Mohammed VI for an integrated and prosperous Africa.

The establishment of AfCFTA should encourage the establishment of “Made in Africa” brand, which will open up important prospects for the development of enterprises and bolster regional relations through increased trade and investment among African countries, he told the Moroccan Press Agency (MAP).



Independent Israeli Commission Blames Netanyahu and Others for October 2023 Attack

A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)
A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)
TT

Independent Israeli Commission Blames Netanyahu and Others for October 2023 Attack

A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)
A protester walks between vehicles as people protest demanding the release of hostages who were kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023 attack, ahead of a possible ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon, in Tel Aviv, Israel, November 26, 2024. (Reuters)

The independent civilian commission of inquiry into the October 2023 Hamas attack on Israel has found Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu directly responsible for the failures leading up to the attack, alongside former defense ministers, the army chief and the heads of the security services.

The civil commission presented its findings today after a four-month probe in which it heard some 120 witnesses. It was set up by relatives of victims of the Hamas attack, in response to the absence of any state probe.

The commission determined that the Israeli government, its army and security services “failed in their primary mission of protecting the citizens of Israel.”

It said Netanyahu was responsible for ignoring “repeated warnings” ahead of Oct. 7, 2023 for what it described as his appeasing approach over the years toward Hamas, and for “undermining all decision-making centers, including the cabinet and the National Security Council, in a way that prevented any serious discussion” on security issues.

The commission further determined that the military and defense leaders bear blame for ignoring warnings from within the army, and for reducing the army’s presence along the Gaza border while relying excessively on technological means.

On the day of the Hamas attack, the report says, the army’s response was both slow and lacking.

The civil commission called for the immediate establishment of a state commission of inquiry into the Oct. 7 attack.

Netanyahu has opposed launching a state commission of inquiry, arguing that such an investigation should begin only once the war is over.