Exclusive – Why Did Paraguay Designate Hezbollah as Terrorist?

Hezbollah members carry flags during the funeral of a fellow fighter. (Reuters)
Hezbollah members carry flags during the funeral of a fellow fighter. (Reuters)
TT
20

Exclusive – Why Did Paraguay Designate Hezbollah as Terrorist?

Hezbollah members carry flags during the funeral of a fellow fighter. (Reuters)
Hezbollah members carry flags during the funeral of a fellow fighter. (Reuters)

Paraguay designate Hezbollah as a terrorist organization less than a month after Argentina became the first South American country to blacklist the Iran-backed group. Paraguay made its move after authorities gathered enough evidence that confirmed the armed party’s close ties with criminal organizations that are active in its shared border region with Brazil and Argentina. The area is a hub for drug smuggling, money-laundering and human-trafficking.

Hezbollah’s operations in Latin America are a cause for mounting concern in the continent, which will likely mean that more countries will follow in Paraguay and Argentina’s lead and blacklist the party.

Are these developments connected to the ongoing clash between the United States and Iran? Most definitely so.

Tehran is the vital connection for funding all of its proxy terrorist groups, starting with Hezbollah. The party’s secretary general even admitted that the members receive all of their salaries directly from Iran. The renewed sanctions on Tehran have, however, impacted the party, forcing it to set up boxes for donations in Lebanon in order to compensate from the drop in financing. This has led to insignificant results, forcing party members to consider the illicit activity in South America as a possible replacement for Iran’s funds.

The party’s actions have not evaded US attention and many officials in Washington have started to demand that Hezbollah be uprooted from South America given its close proximity to US soil.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz had in July addressed a letter to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to underscore Hezbollah’s growing threat in South America. "We must recommit to ensuring that Hezbollah and other Iranian proxies are denied the resources they need to escalate their campaign of global terrorism,” he said on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of Hezbollah’s bombing of the Jewish community center in Argentina. The attack left 85 people dead and 200 wounded.

Cruz’ remarks highlight the major and dangerous project Iran is pursuing through Hezbollah in spreading Shiism in South America. Instilling dogmatic beliefs will pave the way to a future generation that is hostile to the US and that will fuel a major terrorist war against it. Washington has started to realize this threat.

How has Hezbollah, as an Iranian terrorist proxy, managed to reach Latin America?

This did not take place overnight. It began at the end of the Iranian-Iraqi war when Tehran saw in the huge Arab diaspora in South America a fertile ground to recruit agents who will further its revolution and propagate its terrorism. Hezbollah managed to deepen its ties with several populist governments in South America, especially Venezuela with which Iran enjoyed good relations under the rule of late President Hugo Chavez. He believed that the best way to spite the US was to bolster ties with Iran. He therefore, greatly facilitated Hezbollah’s operations in Venezuela and from there, the rest of the continent.

Its spread in South America was made easy by weak governments and border security, as well as rampant corruption.

Matthew Levitt, director of the Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, warned of Hezbollah’s drug trade, saying it would soon be able to reap more funds from it than from any other source.

Moreover, he warned of Hezbollah sleeper cells that are waiting for the signal to strike inside the US itself.

The noose is, however, tightening around Hezbollah in Latin America. Brazil, whose President Jair Bolsonaro boasts very good relations with his American counterpart Donald Trump, may very soon designate Hezbollah as terrorist. The US Congress had recently spoken of the party’s strong support in Brazil, where some 7 million people trace their roots back to Lebanon. One million of those people are Shiites who share Hezbollah’s ideology. Most alarming of all is that the party believes that it can exploit these people to infiltrate any Brazilian government or security agency.

Brazil’s general prosecution also found evidence that ties Hezbollah to two notorious criminal organizations, the Primeiro Comando da Capital and Comando Vermelho.



Trump Carves Up World and International Order with It

Analysts say talks to end the war in Ukraine 'could resemble a new Yalta'. TASS/AFP
Analysts say talks to end the war in Ukraine 'could resemble a new Yalta'. TASS/AFP
TT
20

Trump Carves Up World and International Order with It

Analysts say talks to end the war in Ukraine 'could resemble a new Yalta'. TASS/AFP
Analysts say talks to end the war in Ukraine 'could resemble a new Yalta'. TASS/AFP

By casting doubt on the world order, Donald Trump risks dragging the globe back into an era where great powers impose their imperial will on the weak, analysts warn.
Russia wants Ukraine, China demands Taiwan and now the US president seems to be following suit, whether by coveting Canada as the "51st US state", insisting "we've got to have" Greenland or kicking Chinese interests out of the Panama Canal.
Where the United States once defended state sovereignty and international law, Trump's disregard for his neighbors' borders and expansionist ambitions mark a return to the days when the world was carved up into spheres of influence.
As recently as Wednesday, US defense secretary Pete Hegseth floated the idea of an American military base to secure the Panama Canal, a strategic waterway controlled by the United States until 1999 which Trump's administration has vowed to "take back".
Hegseth's comments came nearly 35 years after the United States invaded to topple Panama's dictator Manuel Noriega, harking back to when successive US administrations viewed Latin America as "America's backyard".
"The Trump 2.0 administration is largely accepting the familiar great power claim to 'spheres of influence'," Professor Gregory O. Hall, of the University of Kentucky, told AFP.
Indian diplomat Jawed Ashraf warned that by "speaking openly about Greenland, Canada, Panama Canal", "the new administration may have accelerated the slide" towards a return to great power domination.
The empire strikes back
Since the end of the Cold War, the United States has posed as the custodian of an international order "based on the ideas of countries' equal sovereignty and territorial integrity", said American researcher Jeffrey Mankoff, of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
But those principles run counter to how Russia and China see their own interests, according to the author of "Empires of Eurasia: how imperial legacies shape international security".
Both countries are "themselves products of empires and continue to function in many ways like empires", seeking to throw their weight around for reasons of prestige, power or protection, Mankoff said.
That is not to say that spheres of influence disappeared with the fall of the Soviet Union.
"Even then, the US and Western allies sought to expand their sphere of influence eastward into what was the erstwhile Soviet and then the Russian sphere of influence," Ashraf, a former adviser to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, pointed out.
But until the return of Trump, the United States exploited its position as the "policeman of the world" to ward off imperial ambitions while pushing its own interests.
Now that Trump appears to view the cost of upholding a rules-based order challenged by its rivals and increasingly criticized in the rest of the world as too expensive, the United States is contributing to the cracks in the facade with Russia and China's help.
And as the international order weakens, the great powers "see opportunities to once again behave in an imperial way", said Mankoff.
Yalta yet again
As at Yalta in 1945, when the United States and the Soviet Union divided the post-World War II world between their respective zones of influence, Washington, Beijing and Moscow could again agree to carve up the globe anew.
"Improved ties between the United States and its great-power rivals, Russia and China, appear to be imminent," Derek Grossman, of the United States' RAND Corporation think tank, said in March.
But the haggling over who gets dominance over what and where would likely come at the expense of other countries.
"Today's major powers are seeking to negotiate a new global order primarily with each other," Monica Toft, professor of international relations at Tufts University in Massachusets wrote in the journal Foreign Affairs.
"In a scenario in which the United States, China, and Russia all agree that they have a vital interest in avoiding a nuclear war, acknowledging each other's spheres of influence can serve as a mechanism to deter escalation," Toft said.
If that were the case, "negotiations to end the war in Ukraine could resemble a new Yalta", she added.
Yet the thought of a Ukraine deemed by Trump to be in Russia's sphere is likely to send shivers down the spines of many in Europe -- not least in Ukraine itself.
"The success or failure of Ukraine to defend its sovereignty is going to have a lot of impact in terms of what the global system ends up looking like a generation from now," Mankoff said.
"So it's important for countries that have the ability and want to uphold an anti-imperial version of international order to assist Ukraine," he added -- pointing the finger at Europe.
"In Trump's world, Europeans need their own sphere of influence," said Rym Momtaz, a researcher at the Carnegie Endowment for Peace.
"For former imperial powers, Europeans seem strangely on the backfoot as nineteenth century spheres of influence come back as the organising principle of global affairs."