Freedom and Change Leader: Military Coup Is Possible, Gosh Has No Role In Sudanese Revolution

Khaled Omer (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Khaled Omer (Asharq Al-Awsat)
TT
20

Freedom and Change Leader: Military Coup Is Possible, Gosh Has No Role In Sudanese Revolution

Khaled Omer (Asharq Al-Awsat)
Khaled Omer (Asharq Al-Awsat)

The leader of the forces of the Declaration of Freedom and Change and the Secretary-General of the Sudanese Congress Party, Khaled Omer, ruled out any role of the former director of National Intelligence and Security Service Salah Abdallah “Gosh” in the Sudanese revolution, adding that such claims were baseless.

In an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat, Omer said: “the forces of freedom and change, relied entirely on the popular will for change and had no connection with any party to the former regime.”

Omer warned of a possible military coup against the transitional authority, noting: “The possibility is present, and its exclusion is a desire; because there are internal and external parties have an interest in blocking the road to the revolution.”

In this regard, he called on the forces of freedom and change and the transitional government to fill the loopholes through which the coup could be carried out, by expanding the base of civil and public forces.

Omer explained that measures taken against the masterminds and perpetrators of the 1989 coup were aimed at holding accountable those who committed crimes against the Sudanese people.
“They are not directed against a particular group or ideology, or Islamists,” he stressed.

“Any Islamist, who has not committed crimes or corruption, has the right to practice political work, preach his ideas and compete in the elections,” Omer underlined.

Regarding the file of transitional justice, Omer explained that the transitional government was very serious in its investigation.
“Certainly the criminals will be held accountable for what they have committed… there is a real will to enforce justice without political influences,” the Sudanese official remarked.

Omer said he believed that it was premature to assess the performance of the transitional government, adding that the forces of freedom and change and the government were doing their best to meet the high aspirations of the people and overcome great challenges ahead.

He described the “divergence of views and attitudes” within a broad coalition such as the forces of freedom and change, including the civil forces, as a “natural reflection” of their different analyses, tactics, and predictions of the prevailing political conditions.

Omer pointed out that the former regime harmed Sudan’s relations with its Arab and African regional environment.
“One of the tasks of the revolution is to establish relations that preserve national sovereignty and reach understandings with the regional environment as a necessary and important issue,” he emphasized.

“The forces of change and the transitional government are doing their utmost to deal with the complex regional issues… and build balanced relations with neighboring countries,” he concluded.



Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
TT
20

Hochstein to Asharq Al-Awsat: Land Border Demarcation between Lebanon, Israel ‘is Within Reach’

AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon
AFP file photo of Amos Hochstein speaking to reporters at the Grand Serail in Beirut, Lebanon

The former US special envoy, Amos Hochstein, said the maritime border agreement struck between Lebanon and Israel in 2022 and the ceasefire deal reached between Israel and Hezbollah at the end of last year show that a land border demarcation “is within reach.”

“We can get to a deal but there has to be political willingness,” he said.

“The agreement of the maritime boundary was unique because we’d been trying to work on it for over 10 years,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“I understood that a simple diplomatic push for a line was not going to work. It had to be a more complicated and comprehensive agreement. And there was a real threat that people didn’t realize that if we didn’t reach an agreement we would have ended up in a conflict - in a hot conflict - or war over resources.”

He said there is a possibility to reach a Lebanese-Israeli land border agreement because there’s a “provision that mandated the beginning of talks on the land boundary.”

“I believe with concerted effort they can be done quickly,” he said, adding: “It is within reach.”

Hochstein described communication with Hezbollah as “complicated,” saying “I never had only one interlocutor with Hezbollah .... and the first step is to do shuttle diplomacy between Lebanon, Lebanon and Lebanon, and then you had to go to Israel and do shuttle diplomacy between the different factions” there.

“The reality of today and the reality of 2022 are different. Hezbollah had a lock on the political system in Lebanon in the way it doesn’t today.”

North of Litani

The 2024 ceasefire agreement requires Israel to withdraw from Lebanon and for the Lebanese army to take full operational control of the south Litani region, all the way up to the border. It requires Hezbollah to demilitarize and move further north of the Litani region, he said.

“I don’t want to get into the details of other violations,” he said, but stated that the ceasefire works if both conditions are met.

Lebanon’s opportunity

“Lebanon can rewrite its future ... but it has to be a fundamental change,” he said.

“There is so much potential in Lebanon and if you can bring back opportunity and jobs - and through economic and legal reforms in the country - I think that the future is very bright,” Hochstein told Asharq Al-Awsat.

“Hezbollah is not trying to control the politics and remember that Hezbollah is just an arm of Iran” which “should not be imposing its political will in Lebanon, Israel should not be imposing its military will in Lebanon, Syria should not. No one should. This a moment for Lebanon to make decisions for itself,” he added.