Pentagon Denies Trying to Underplay Injuries From Iran Attack

US soldiers are seen at the site where an Iranian missile hit at Ain al-Asad airbase in Anbar province, Iraq. REUTERS/John Davison
US soldiers are seen at the site where an Iranian missile hit at Ain al-Asad airbase in Anbar province, Iraq. REUTERS/John Davison
TT
20

Pentagon Denies Trying to Underplay Injuries From Iran Attack

US soldiers are seen at the site where an Iranian missile hit at Ain al-Asad airbase in Anbar province, Iraq. REUTERS/John Davison
US soldiers are seen at the site where an Iranian missile hit at Ain al-Asad airbase in Anbar province, Iraq. REUTERS/John Davison

The Pentagon said on Friday there had been no effort to play down or delay the release of information on concussive injuries from Iran’s Jan. 8 attack on a base hosting US forces in Iraq, saying the public learned just hours after the defense secretary.

US President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, and others throughout the US government for a week had said that Iran’s attack on bases in Iraq, in retaliation for the killing of an Iranian general, had not killed or injured any US servicemembers.

That is no longer true, the Pentagon now acknowledges. But US military leadership in Washington only became aware on Thursday that 11 US service members were flown out of Iraq due to concussive symptoms, Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman said.

“This idea that there was an effort to de-emphasize injuries for some sort of amorphous political agenda doesn’t hold water,” Reuters quoted Hoffman as saying.

But the disclosure of the concussive symptoms late on Thursday, more than a week after the attack itself, is likely at a minimum to open a debate about the Pentagon’s longstanding treatment of brain injury as a different class of wounds that it says do not require immediate reporting up the chain of command.

US military has to immediately report incidents threatening life, limb or eyesight. But suspected brain injury, which can take time to manifest and diagnose, does not have that urgent requirement.

Esper was only informed on Thursday that the service members were flown out of Iraq to receive additional screening and treatment in bases in Kuwait and Germany, the Pentagon said.

The first U.S. service member was flown out of Iraq on Jan. 10 for further evaluation, while others were flown out on Jan. 15.



Diplomats Dismiss to Asharq Al-Awsat Claims about UNIFIL Withdrawal from Lebanon

Peacekeepers of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) ride in armored vehicles during a patrol along the border with Israel by the village of Kfar Kila in south Lebanon on June 4, 2025. (AFP)
Peacekeepers of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) ride in armored vehicles during a patrol along the border with Israel by the village of Kfar Kila in south Lebanon on June 4, 2025. (AFP)
TT
20

Diplomats Dismiss to Asharq Al-Awsat Claims about UNIFIL Withdrawal from Lebanon

Peacekeepers of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) ride in armored vehicles during a patrol along the border with Israel by the village of Kfar Kila in south Lebanon on June 4, 2025. (AFP)
Peacekeepers of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) ride in armored vehicles during a patrol along the border with Israel by the village of Kfar Kila in south Lebanon on June 4, 2025. (AFP)

Western and United Nations diplomats dismissed as rumors claims that the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was pulling out of the country.

The Lebanese government is expected to request the extension of the peacekeeping forces’ mandate that expires in August.

A US State Department spokesperson told Asharq Al-Awsat that the reports about the withdrawal are “inaccurate”. He did not elaborate further.

UNIFIL has been deployed in southern Lebanon since March 1978. Some amendments to its mandate were introduced after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and again after the July 2006 war between Israel and Hezbollah.

Debate rages every year over its duties as the deadline for renewing its mission approaches. Some countries have sought to grant the force more powers, which would put it at odds with Hezbollah that holds sway in the areas of its deployment.

Hezbollah was severely weakened after last year’s war with Israel and the ensuing ceasefire agreement had demanded that the Iran-backed party remove its weapons from the South.

UNIFIL forces are deployed south of the Litani River and along the border with Israel. It boasts over 10,000 soldiers from some 50 countries, as well as 800 civilian employees.

UNIFIL spokesperson Andrea Tenenti told Asharq Al-Awsat that the forces’ greatest challenge is the lack of a long-term political solution between Lebanon and Israel.

UNIFIL continues to encourage the parties to renew their commitment to fully implementing UN Security Council resolution 1701 and taking tangible steps to address pending issues related to it, including steps that would lead to a permanent ceasefire, he added.

It is too soon to tell what UNIFIL’s mandate will be like after next August, he went on to say, stressing that changing its mission is up to the Security Council.

Israeli media had reported that the United States wanted to end UNIFIL’s mission. Speaking to Asharq Al-Awsat, a diplomat dismissed the report as “usual fearmongering aimed at influencing Lebanon and other parties interested in extending UNIFIL’s mandate and its role in preserving stability in the South and along the Blue Line between Lebanon and Israel.”

The Security Council is currently awaiting Lebanon’s request to extend the mandate for another year, said western diplomats. The letter will include Lebanon’s clear demand for the withdrawal of Israeli forces from all occupied Lebanese territories, including the five hilltops it seized during last year’s war.

The ceasefire agreement demanded that Israel pull out from those areas within 60 days.

Lebanon has been seeking to resolve this issue through the quintet committee tasked with monitoring the ceasefire and through intense contacts with the US.

US officials are considering pulling American support from UNIFIL in a bid to cut costs associated with its operations, the Israel Hayom newspaper reported Sunday evening. US sources later confirmed to The Times of Israel that the option was on the table.