US Planning New Strategy to Isolate Damascus ‘for Years’ to Come

A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)
A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)
TT

US Planning New Strategy to Isolate Damascus ‘for Years’ to Come

A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)
A man inspects the damage in the village of Maaret al-Naasan in Syria's Idlib province. (AFP)

A new American plan to isolate the Syrian regime is beginning to take shape. The plan includes a series of military, political, diplomatic, economic and legislative measures that will isolate Damascus “for years.”

Mid-June will be decisive in moving the plan forward as the Caesar Act will begin to be implemented. The act calls for imposing strict sanctions against any Syrian or non-Syrian side that helps in the country’s reconstruction.

A donors conference on Syria’s reconstruction will also be held in Brussels in June. Russia and the West are also headed on a collision course over the decision to extend humanitarian assistance across the Syrian borders. The UN Security Council had in January extended to June 10 authorization for the agency and its partners to deliver humanitarian aid across borders into Syria.

On the other front, Damascus, with Russian and Iranian support, has intensified its campaign to capture the strategic highways between Aleppo and Damascus and Aleppo and Latakia. Capturing the routes will revive Syria’s economy and ease the burden of sanctions and isolation.

The field campaign is accompanied by Russian diplomatic efforts to “normalize” relations between the regime and Europe and the “Arab family.” The upcoming Syrian parliamentary elections and the 2021 presidential elections will also play into these efforts.

The United States has sought to counter these moves by intensifying its contacts with influential European and Arab countries, taking into consideration the regime advances in the Idlib and Aleppo countrysides, the election of a new European Commission chief and Britain’s departure from the European Union.

In meetings with various European officials, the Americans have frequently stressed that Washington was not seeking a regime change in Syria, but a change in behavior. It means that Syria should not destabilize its neighbors and region, support terrorism or threaten Washington’s allies in the region. It must also abandon chemical weapons and ensure that they have been eradicated in line with the 2013 American-Russian agreement. The regime must also ensure the safe voluntary return of refugees to their homes and hold war criminals accountable.

The US is demanding the formation of a Syrian government that can meet the above demands, noting that the current one is incapable of doing so as demonstrated in its failure to respect UN Security Council resolutions 2118 and 2254.

The American disappointment is not limited to Damascus, but extends to Moscow because the American-Russian cooperation has failed to bear fruit in Syria. All it has achieved is avert a military clash between Washington and Moscow and turn a blind eye to Israeli strikes on Syria.

Given the above, escalation against Damascus appears like the natural trajectory. The US will forge ahead with economic, political, diplomatic and military pressure, starting with the implementation of the Caesar Act. European sanctions will also play a role. Europe recently imposed sanctions against ten people and entities affiliated with the regime.

With the Americans and Europeans seeing eye-to-eye, attention will be turned to the Brussels donor conference where conditions will be laid out before Damascus to facilitate a credible political process and provide the necessary conditions for the safe return of refugees in exchange for reconstruction.

Politically, Washington will preserve its relations with the Syrian opposition and contacts with refugees to unite ranks. It will also intensify contacts with the small group on Syria that support the opposition. It includes the US, Britain, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt.

Diplomatically, it will maintain its open contacts with Arab and European countries to avert political and diplomatic normalization of ties with the regime. It will support the Geneva political process to implement resolution 2254.

Militarily, Washington will continue to exert its pressure through its troops deployed east of the Euphrates River and continue to support the Syrian Democratic Forces and prevent regime forces from seizing territories from them. It will also exert efforts to prevent the regime from exploiting natural resources, such as oil and gas. The US will also maintain its al-Tanf military base and block supply routes between Tehran and Damascus.

It will also focus its attention on Turkey by providing it with intelligence and diplomatic support in areas it controls against regime and Russian forces in Idlib. Washington may seek to exploit the differences between Ankara and Moscow over Idlib in its favor. It will also continue to “bless” Israeli strikes against Damascus.

Should the US go ahead with its plan, the regime will be faced with years of isolation until desired change is achieved - unless Syria springs a surprise or the Russians and Americans reach an understanding.



What to Know about Sudden Gains of the Opposition in Syria's 13-year War and Why it Matters

Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)
Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)
TT

What to Know about Sudden Gains of the Opposition in Syria's 13-year War and Why it Matters

Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)
Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)

The 13-year civil war in Syria has roared back into prominence with a surprise opposition offensive on Aleppo, one of Syria's largest cities and an ancient business hub. The push is among the opposition’s strongest in years in a war whose destabilizing effects have rippled far beyond the country's borders.
It was the first opposition attack on Aleppo since 2016, when a brutal air campaign by Russian warplanes helped Syrian President Bashar Assad retake the northwestern city. Intervention by Russia, Iran and Iranian-allied Hezbollah and other groups has allowed Assad to remain in power, within the 70% of Syria under his control.
The surge in fighting has raised the prospect of another violent front reopening in the Middle East, at a time when US-backed Israel is fighting Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, both Iranian-allied groups.
Robert Ford, the last-serving US ambassador to Syria, pointed to months of Israeli strikes on Syrian and Hezbollah targets in the area, and to Israel’s ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon this week, as factors providing Syria’s opposition groups with the opportunity to advance.
Here's a look at some of the key aspects of the new fighting:
Why does the fighting at Aleppo matter? Assad has been at war with opposition forces seeking his overthrow for 13 years, a conflict that's killed an estimated half-million people. Some 6.8 million Syrians have fled the country, a refugee flow that helped change the political map in Europe by fueling anti-immigrant far-right movements.
The roughly 30% of the country not under Assad is controlled by a range of opposition forces and foreign troops. The US has about 900 troops in northeast Syria, far from Aleppo, to guard against a resurgence by the ISIS extremist group. Both the US and Israel conduct occasional strikes in Syria against government forces and Iran-allied militias. Türkiye has forces in Syria as well, and has influence with the broad alliance of opposition forces storming Aleppo.
Coming after years with few sizeable changes in territory between Syria's warring parties, the fighting “has the potential to be really quite, quite consequential and potentially game-changing,” if Syrian government forces prove unable to hold their ground, said Charles Lister, a longtime Syria analyst with the US-based Middle East Institute. Risks include if ISIS fighters see it as an opening, Lister said.
Ford said the fighting in Aleppo would become more broadly destabilizing if it drew Russia and Türkiye— each with its own interests to protect in Syria — into direct heavy fighting against each other. -
What do we know about the group leading the offensive on Aleppo? The US and UN have long designated the opposition force leading the attack at Aleppo — Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, known by its initials HTS — as a terrorist organization.
Its leader, Abu Mohammed al-Golani, emerged as the leader of al-Qaeda's Syria branch in 2011, in the first months of Syria's war. His fight was an unwelcome intervention to many in Syria's opposition, who hoped to keep the fight against Assad's brutal rule untainted by violent extremism.
Golani early on claimed responsibility for deadly bombings, pledged to attack Western forces and sent religious police to enforce modest dress by women.
Golani has sought to remake himself in recent years. He renounced his al-Qaeda ties in 2016. He's disbanded his religious police force, cracked down on extremist groups in his territory, and portrayed himself as a protector of other religions. That includes last year allowing the first Christian Mass in the city of Idlib in years.
What's the history of Aleppo in the war? At the crossroads of trade routes and empires for thousands of years, Aleppo is one of the centers of commerce and culture in the Middle East.
Aleppo was home to 2.3 million people before the war. Opposition forces seized the east side of the city in 2012, and it became the proudest symbol of the advance of armed opposition factions.
In 2016, government forces backed by Russian airstrikes laid siege to the city. Russian shells, missiles and crude barrel bombs — fuel canisters or other containers loaded with explosives and metal — methodically leveled neighborhoods. Starving and under siege, the opposition surrendered Aleppo that year.
The Russian military's entry was the turning point in the war, allowing Assad to stay on in the territory he held.
This year, Israeli airstrikes in Aleppo have hit Hezbollah weapons depots and Syrian forces, among other targets, according to an independent monitoring group. Israel rarely acknowledges strikes at Aleppo and other government-held areas of Syria.