Sudan’s Ex-Foreign Minister Mansour Khalid Dies

Former Sudanese foreign minister Mansour Khalid.
Former Sudanese foreign minister Mansour Khalid.
TT
20

Sudan’s Ex-Foreign Minister Mansour Khalid Dies

Former Sudanese foreign minister Mansour Khalid.
Former Sudanese foreign minister Mansour Khalid.

Sudan’s prominent intellectual, veteran politician and former foreign minister Mansour Khalid died at age 89 in one of Khartoum’s hospitals, leaving behind a long and rich legacy.

Khalid was a published author with books, written both in English and Arabic, focused on Sudan’s political spectrum, which he was famous for sharply criticizing. In one of his books, “The Sudanese political elite and the addiction of failure,” he discussed deeply the failures of the political ruling class in post-1956 Sudan.

He was raised by a Sufi family in the city of Omdurman, where he was born in 1931.

A fierce intellectual, Khalid received a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1957. It was followed by a Master of Laws from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania three years later. Khalid earned a Doctor of Philosophy degree from the University of Paris in a couple of years.

At the University of Colorado, Khalid lectured on international law, comparative law and the law of international aid.

Khalid’s literary talent shined bright since his school days. He soon drew attention to his excellence in research and investigation, the accuracy of analysis, and his high writing and language integrity capabilities.

He worked as an independent press correspondent for a number of dailies, then as a reporter for AFP from Khartoum.

After his graduation, he practiced law in the office of the late lawyer and politician Farouk Abu Issa, and after that he moved to work as a secretary in the office of former Prime Minister Abdullah Khalil.

Khalid served as the minister of youth and social affairs at the government of Sudan. In the early 1970s, President Jaafar Nimeri appointed Khalid as Foreign Minister.

Khalid stirred a lot of political, intellectual and cultural controversy, especially after deciding to join the 1969 seizure of power under Nimeri.

Khalid also set up a long collaboration with the United Nations, first as a law officer at its New York City secretariat. More so, Khalid achieved a transfer to Paris where he worked with UNESCO as an officer responsible for Arab states in the bureau of relations with member states for four years.

In the 1980s, Khalid shared close ties with the late South Sudan politician John Garang.

Khalid became close to Garang, which made him contribute to theorizing the idea of the "New Sudan", a political project that the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) was proposing to end the ongoing war and political turmoil.

Khalid had joined the SPLM which had been fighting against the rule of now ousted President Omar al-Bashir, before signing peace agreement in 2005, that later led to the separation of the South from the North in 2011.



US Seeks to Persuade Lebanon to Start Talks with Israel

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)
TT
20

US Seeks to Persuade Lebanon to Start Talks with Israel

Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun attends a joint press conference with French President Emmanuel Macron at the Elysee Palace in Paris, Friday, March 28, 2025. (Sarah Meyssonnier/Pool via AP)

Israel’s response to the launch of two unidentified rockets marks a shift as it coincides with the planned return of US Deputy Special Envoy for the Middle East Morgan Ortagus to Beirut.

In her second visit, Ortagus aims to persuade Lebanon’s government to engage in diplomatic negotiations with Tel Aviv.

The proposed talks would involve three working groups tasked with securing the release of Lebanese detainees, overseeing Israel’s withdrawal from remaining occupied points, and delineating borders in accordance with the 1949 armistice agreement.

The launch of two rockets marks the second such incident in less than a week.

The first attack took place last Saturday, targeting the Israeli settlement of Metula with three rockets, which were intercepted and brought down by Israel near the Blue Line.

The latest rocket fire coincided with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun’s meeting with his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron in Paris, in what appeared to be a message that the Lebanese army’s efforts to assert state authority over all national territory were insufficient—particularly as Ortagus prepares for her return to Beirut.

The identity of those behind the rocket launches remains unclear, as Hezbollah has repeatedly denied any involvement.

Sources familiar with the security meeting chaired by Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, who was in contact with Aoun during his talks with Macron, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the meeting closely examined the question of who was responsible for the attacks.

According to the sources, the assessment within the expanded security meeting was that Hezbollah had no interest in launching the rockets.

Discussions among security officials, however, also ruled out Palestinian factions, as the rockets were fired from an area under Hezbollah’s influence.

Hezbollah, the sources noted, is sensitive to the prevailing mood among Lebanon’s Shiite community, which seeks stability in the south—a goal that remains elusive while the war continues.

The group is wary of alienating its support base and has refrained from responding to Israeli ceasefire violations, despite the embarrassment this causes within its ranks.

Currently, Hezbollah is aligned with the Lebanese government’s diplomatic efforts to pressure Israel into withdrawing from southern Lebanon, the sources said. President Aoun recently affirmed that the group is cooperating with the Lebanese army south of the Litani River.

If the ongoing military intelligence investigation determines that neither Hezbollah nor any other local actor was involved in the rocket launches, questions may arise over whether Israel itself was behind the attack, given its history of ceasefire violations.

Israel, the sources added, has the most to gain from undermining the US-French-brokered ceasefire agreement.

Hezbollah, meanwhile, has little to gain from escalating tensions, particularly as Lebanon enters Eid al-Fitr and Easter—holidays that traditionally bring an influx of expatriates and provide a much-needed economic boost.

The sources also questioned whether Israel, with its extensive surveillance capabilities, was truly unable to detect and prevent the launch of the two 107mm rockets.

They pointed out that Israel maintains close aerial monitoring over southern Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley, and the Lebanese-Syrian border, frequently tracking and assassinating Hezbollah operatives.

It has previously targeted the group’s military facilities but did not strike the site from which the rockets were launched, nor the platform used in the attack. Instead, Israel imposed a tit-for-tat equation, equating Kiryat Shmona with Beirut’s southern suburbs—just as it had earlier linked Metula to the Lebanese capital.

The sources did not rule out the possibility that Israel orchestrated the attack through its agents—an angle security services continue to investigate.

If no Lebanese group is found responsible, the sources suggested, the incident could be linked to internal divisions within Hezbollah, where some elements advocate military responses to Israeli violations, while others back the government’s diplomatic approach.

Israel’s response, they added, fits within broader efforts to pressure Lebanon into direct negotiations—a move openly supported by Washington, as conveyed through Ortagus.

The timing of the rocket launch, coinciding with the Aoun-Macron meeting, was seen as an attempt to push France toward aligning with the US position, rather than maintaining its current stance, which is more sympathetic to Lebanon’s perspective.

Ahead of Ortagus’s visit, Aoun outlined Lebanon’s approach to the US proposal from Paris, stressing that any negotiations must distinguish between three separate issues: the release of Lebanese detainees, Israel’s withdrawal from occupied points, and border demarcation under internationally recognized diplomatic protocols—without leading to normalization with Israel or forcing Lebanon into a “war or negotiations” scenario dictated by Tel Aviv.