Sharp Differences between Moscow, Damascus Play out in the Media

A woman at empty Souk al-Hamidieh, as restrictions are imposed as measure to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Damascus, Syria March 24, 2020. (Reuters)
A woman at empty Souk al-Hamidieh, as restrictions are imposed as measure to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Damascus, Syria March 24, 2020. (Reuters)
TT
20

Sharp Differences between Moscow, Damascus Play out in the Media

A woman at empty Souk al-Hamidieh, as restrictions are imposed as measure to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Damascus, Syria March 24, 2020. (Reuters)
A woman at empty Souk al-Hamidieh, as restrictions are imposed as measure to prevent the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Damascus, Syria March 24, 2020. (Reuters)

In a sign of the growing divide between Damascus and Moscow, a Syrian lawmaker released on Friday a strongly-worded article critical of Russia and President Vladimir Putin.

In his article, “What if Assad Was Angry with Putin?”, MP Khaled Abboud declared that Iran and the Lebanese Hezbollah party were regime leader Bashar Assad’s main allies.

Russia’s intervention in the Syrian conflict achieved joint Syrian-Russian interests in confronting the United States. The intervention did not “save” the regime, as Moscow has repeatedly claimed at various formal events, continued the MP.

Moreover, Abboud alleged that “if Assad were to become angry, then he can pull the rug right from under Putin even in the Kremlin.” Assad can “dash” all of Putin’s “glory and accomplishments.”

He warned that Syria can “drown” Putin in a long conflict in the Latakia mountains, Hauran or the Syrian Desert (Badia), describing Russian troops as “occupation” forces.

“If Assad wanted to stand against Putin, the Russian president would not only be defeated in Syria, but Russia’s expansion throughout the world will be curbed and Putin’s name will forever be crossed out from Russian history,” he stated.

Observers told Asharq Al-Awsat that the critical article reveals that Damascus’ rulers are upset with the recent Russian media campaigns against them.

Russia has been growing increasingly critical of Damascus, issuing a series of scathing attacks against the regime over the spread of rampant corruption in Syria, its inability to impose its authority in areas under its control and the drop in Assad’s popularity, whom Moscow now views as a burden.

A Syrian lawmaker cannot make such statements without receiving the green light from the higher ups, remarked the observers.

Abboud was not the first official to come out and condemn Russia. Just days ago, former ambassador and military official, Bahjat Suleiman slammed Russia for only intervening in Syria “54 months after Damascus was left alone to confront a cosmic conspiracy.”

Moscow has yet to respond to the criticism, but decision-making circles said that such statements reflect a “total lack of political responsibility or awareness” during this dangerous time in Syria.

Former diplomat Rami al-Shaar, who is close to the Russian foreign ministry, said Russian officials have been “shocked” with the statements coming in from Damascus.

He added however, that they have stressed that such criticism is not being made by the Damascus leadership and should therefore, be dismissed.



Iraq Accuses Hezbollah Brigades of Breaking the Law

Iraqi PMF fighters raise the force’s flag during military drills (PMF)
Iraqi PMF fighters raise the force’s flag during military drills (PMF)
TT
20

Iraq Accuses Hezbollah Brigades of Breaking the Law

Iraqi PMF fighters raise the force’s flag during military drills (PMF)
Iraqi PMF fighters raise the force’s flag during military drills (PMF)

Iraq has accused the Iran-aligned Hezbollah Brigades of attacking a government agriculture office in Baghdad late last month, prompting the dismissal of two Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) brigade commanders, officials said on Saturday.

Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani vowed to tighten state control over weapons, enforce the rule of law and fight corruption, saying such measures were not aimed at any specific group or individual.

“There is no justification for weapons outside state institutions amid the security stability,” he said in a statement.

Military spokesman Major General Sabah al-Numan said an investigation found that armed members of the PMF’s 45th and 46th brigades, part of the Hezbollah Brigades, had stormed the Agriculture Directorate in Baghdad’s Karkh district without orders, violating military protocol and using weapons against security forces.

The attack killed and wounded several people, including civilians, he said.

The investigation linked the office’s director, Eyad Kazem Ali, to the incident, accusing him of prior coordination with the armed group and of involvement in administrative corruption, forgery and unlawful seizure of agricultural land.

Al-Numan said the probe revealed “gaps in leadership and control” within the PMF and the presence of formations that ignore military regulations.

Sudani approved the panel’s recommendations to remove the two brigade commanders, open an inquiry into the PMF’s al-Jazeera Operations commander for dereliction of duty, and refer all suspects to the judiciary with supporting evidence.

The government also ordered security agencies to address any PMF violations of regulations and act swiftly against threats to public order, stressing that no group or individual is above the law.