Tunisian Lawmakers Warn Saied of Withdrawing Confidence

Tunisia's elected president Kais Saied speaks during his swearing-in ceremony at the Assembly of People's Representatives in Tunis, Tunisia October 23, 2019REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
Tunisia's elected president Kais Saied speaks during his swearing-in ceremony at the Assembly of People's Representatives in Tunis, Tunisia October 23, 2019REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
TT

Tunisian Lawmakers Warn Saied of Withdrawing Confidence

Tunisia's elected president Kais Saied speaks during his swearing-in ceremony at the Assembly of People's Representatives in Tunis, Tunisia October 23, 2019REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi
Tunisia's elected president Kais Saied speaks during his swearing-in ceremony at the Assembly of People's Representatives in Tunis, Tunisia October 23, 2019REUTERS/Zoubeir Souissi

Tunisia’s founder of the opposition Karama Coalition, Seifeddine Makhlouf, accused President Kais Saied of inciting against lawmakers, by trying to justify calls for violence and threats against some of them.

Makhlouf said that Tunisians will withdraw their confidence in Saied should he continue his unacceptable interference in parliamentary affairs, accusing Saeid of justifying violence and revolt against state institutions, especially against lawmakers.

Criticism has targeted Saied after his statement in the southern city of Kebili, where he called for the withdrawal of confidence from deputies should they fail to step up to the tasks handed to them.

Saied also criticized the proposal to amend Chapter 45 of the parliament’s by-laws led by the Islamic Ennahda Movement. He considered it a grave violation of the constitution and stressed that Tunisians could strip deputies of their position should they fail to serve the country’s interests

This was received as a call to revolt against parliamentarians and an unwarranted intervention of the executive authority in legislative affairs.

Makhlouf said that Saied’s speech was “very dangerous,” accusing him of justifying violence against state institutions and the elected authority.

“While MPs waited for Saied to disavow calls for chaos and blood, which were issued by some of his supporters, and those who ran his election campaign, they were surprised by his choice to present us with theories of legality and legitimacy,” Makhlouf said.

Meanwhile, the presidency denounced accusations against Saied of inciting against lawmakers as false and reassured that the president “was and still is keen on preserving the stability of state affairs during this important phase.”

The presidency defended Saied’s right to criticize the performance of some deputies and decisions issued by parliament, saying the president believes that sovereignty ultimately belongs to the people.



US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
TT

US Links Ankara-Damascus Normalization to Political Solution in Syria

Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)
Meeting between Erdogan and Assad in 2010 (Archive)

Recent statements by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on his willingness to meet Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to normalize relations between the two countries have sparked mixed reactions.
While the Syrian opposition sees the possibility of such a meeting despite the challenges, Damascus views the statements as a political maneuver by the Turks. Meanwhile, the United States has tied the normalization process to achieving a political solution in Syria based on UN Security Council Resolution 2254, issued in 2015.
Turkish media reported on Thursday that a US administration official, who was not named, confirmed that Washington is against normalizing relations with the Syrian regime under Assad. He emphasized that Washington cannot accept normalizing ties with Damascus without progress toward a political solution that ends the conflicts in Syria.
Meanwhile, the head of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces, Hadi al-Bahra, stated that a meeting between Assad and Erdogan is possible despite the obstacles. In a statement to Reuters on Thursday, Bahra said the meeting is feasible, even though Ankara is fully aware that the Assad regime cannot currently meet its demands and understands the regime’s limitations.
Bahra pointed out that the UN-led political process remains frozen and that he had briefed US and Western officials on the latest developments in the Syrian file. On Saturday, Bahra participated in a consultative meeting in Ankara with the Syrian Negotiation Commission, along with a high-level delegation from the US State Department, during which they exchanged views on the political solution and the need to establish binding mechanisms for implementing international resolutions related to the Syrian issue.
On the other side, Assad’s special advisor, Bouthaina Shaaban, dismissed Erdogan’s announcement that Ankara is awaiting a response from Damascus regarding his meeting with Assad for normalization as another political maneuver with ulterior motives.
Shaaban, speaking during a lecture at the Omani Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which was reported by Turkish media on Thursday, stated that any rapprochement between the two countries is contingent on its withdrawal of forces from Syrian territory.