The Pros and Cons of 'Working From Home' in Saudi Arabia

Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)
Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)
TT

The Pros and Cons of 'Working From Home' in Saudi Arabia

Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)
Some jobs cannot be done remotely (AFP)

Quarantine at home has changed several cultures, notions, and convictions that would have otherwise been difficult to change had they not been necessary precautions under the current crisis. Even if these changes are temporary, they could be the beginning of a new post-Corona stage.

Saudi Arabians have spent more than two months in home quarantine, changing their sitting areas into temporary workspaces to work uninterrupted in several sectors and domains despite the challenges and obstacles that the pandemic has created.

Despite being short, this period of working “remotely” has changed ideas and convictions. After some thought that it was difficult to work remotely, another conviction surfaced that sees working remotely to be easier, saving both time and money across different sectors. This has opened a new transformative phase in the work environment in Saudi Arabia, especially after international companies issued decisions to convert to working remotely even after the pandemic ends.

Saudis began working remotely on 18 March after the government issued a decision to shut down all sectors and impose working from home.

Before that, in January, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development launched a remote working program that aimed to bridge the gap between employers and job seekers after the latter suffered from several obstacles in finding job opportunities. This program, however, was not large-scale but was limited to those who face transportation difficulties.

In this last period, meetings have shifted from offices and meeting rooms to remote meeting software in different sectors, including ministerial and large and small company meetings.

Rouaa al-Mehanna sees that most notable advantages of remote working are more flexibility and concentration, despite some managers feeling that completing one’s tasks outside of the workplace is like a vacation or leads to a lower quality of work which then leads to more pressure even after the eight-hour workday stipulated by Saudi labor laws is over.

These meetings have opened up primary themes for the future of the work sector after the coronavirus pandemic, especially that there is an ongoing experiment that is yet to end and has proven its high effectiveness in different sectors and jobs. This compels us to rethink the future of jobs and to change how we conduct them and how workspaces are organized, shrinking some offices while entirely getting rid of others. This may have several advantages, including saving time and effort, avoiding traffic, among others.

Also, there were clear implications on several sectors that were unable to convert to remote working and endure the crisis, leading to a decline in their productivity after their work teams were dispersed.



Little Hope in Gaza that Arrest Warrants will Cool Israeli Onslaught

Palestinians gather to buy bread from a bakery, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip November 22, 2024. REUTERS/Hussam Al-Masri Purchase Licensing Rights
Palestinians gather to buy bread from a bakery, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip November 22, 2024. REUTERS/Hussam Al-Masri Purchase Licensing Rights
TT

Little Hope in Gaza that Arrest Warrants will Cool Israeli Onslaught

Palestinians gather to buy bread from a bakery, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip November 22, 2024. REUTERS/Hussam Al-Masri Purchase Licensing Rights
Palestinians gather to buy bread from a bakery, amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, in Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip November 22, 2024. REUTERS/Hussam Al-Masri Purchase Licensing Rights

Gazans saw little hope on Friday that International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Israeli leaders would slow down the onslaught on the Palestinian territory, where medics said at least 24 people were killed in fresh Israeli military strikes.

In Gaza City in the north, an Israeli strike on a house in Shejaia killed eight people, medics said. Three others were killed in a strike near a bakery and a fisherman was killed as he set out to sea. In the central and southern areas, 12 people were killed in three separate Israeli airstrikes.

Meanwhile, Israeli forces deepened their incursion and bombardment of the northern edge of the enclave, their main offensive since early last month. The military says it aims to prevent Hamas fighters from waging attacks and regrouping there; residents say they fear the aim is to permanently depopulate a strip of territory as a buffer zone, which Israel denies.

Residents in the three besieged towns on the northern edge - Jabalia, Beit Lahiya and Beit Hanoun - said Israeli forces had blown up dozens of houses.

An Israeli strike hit the Kamal Adwan Hospital in Beit Lahiya, one of three medical facilities barely operational in the area, injuring six medical staff, some critically, the Gaza health ministry said in a statement, Reuters reported.

"The strike also destroyed the hospital's main generator, and punctured the water tanks, leaving the hospital without oxygen or water, which threatens the lives of patients and staff inside the hospital," it added. It said 85 wounded people including children and women were inside, eight in the ICU.

Later on Friday, the Gaza health ministry said all hospital services across the enclave would stop within 48 hours unless fuel shipments are permitted, blaming restrictions which Israel says are designed to stop fuel being used by Hamas.

Gazans saw the ICC's decision to seek the arrest of Israeli leaders for suspected war crimes as international recognition of the enclave's plight. But those queuing for bread at a bakery in the southern city of Khan Younis were doubtful it would have any impact.

"The decision will not be implemented because America protects Israel, and it can veto anything. Israel will not be held accountable," said Saber Abu Ghali, as he waited for his turn in the crowd.

Saeed Abu Youssef, 75, said even if justice were to arrive, it would be decades late: "We have been hearing decisions for more than 76 years that have not been implemented and haven't done anything for us."

Since Hamas's October 7th attack on Israel, nearly 44,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, much of which has been laid to waste.

The court's prosecutors said there were reasonable grounds to believe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant were criminally responsible for acts including murder, persecution, and starvation as a weapon of war, as part of a "widespread and systematic attack against the civilian population of Gaza".

The Hague-based court also ordered the arrest of the top Hamas commander Ibrahim Al-Masri, also known as Mohammed Deif. Israel says it has already killed him, which Hamas has not confirmed.

Israel says Hamas is to blame for all harm to Gaza's civilians, for operating among them, which Hamas denies.

Israeli politicians from across the political spectrum have denounced the ICC arrest warrants as biased and based on false evidence, and Israel says the court has no jurisdiction over the war. Hamas hailed the arrest warrants as a first step towards justice.

Efforts by Arab mediators Qatar and Egypt backed by the United States to conclude a ceasefire deal have stalled. Hamas wants a deal that ends the war, while Netanyahu has vowed the war can end only once Hamas is eradicated.