Algeria: Rights Group Criticizes Arrest of Activists

Anti-riot police clash with people protesting against president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in Algiers, Algeria March 8, 2019. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
Anti-riot police clash with people protesting against president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in Algiers, Algeria March 8, 2019. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
TT
20

Algeria: Rights Group Criticizes Arrest of Activists

Anti-riot police clash with people protesting against president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in Algiers, Algeria March 8, 2019. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra
Anti-riot police clash with people protesting against president Abdelaziz Bouteflika, in Algiers, Algeria March 8, 2019. REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra

An Algerian human rights group condemned prison sentences against three activists on charges of harming national unity, and criticizing President Abdelmajid Tebboun and the judiciary.

The National Committee for the Release of Detainees (CNLD) announced on Wednesday that three opposition activists were sentenced to jail over Facebook posts.

It said that Soheib Debaghi was sentenced in Algiers to one year in prison on charges of encouraging an illegal gathering, insulting an official body and publishing potentially damaging material.

Larbi Tahar and Boussif Mohamed Boudiaf, were handed 18-month prison sentences by a court in the western town of El-Bayadh, also for posts on Facebook, according to the CNLD.

The activists accuse the Algerian authorities of trying to suppress the opposition by arresting those who criticize state officials.

For its part, the government denied violating human rights, especially after Tebboun pledged to expand freedoms in a new constitution that will be voted upon in a referendum later this year.

A number of activists have been prosecuted for their posts on social media since the start of the protest movement on February 22, 2019.

Arrest campaigns against opposition figures, journalists and the media have not stopped, even after the movement suspended all of its activities in mid-March after the COVID-19 lockdown that prevented political, cultural, sports and religious gatherings.

In remarks to AFP, Historian Karima Direche said “this is a blind repression and an attack on the media, activists and social media,” describing a “dying regime” swinging towards harsher authoritarianism.



Washington Signals Gradual, Sweeping Sanctions on Iraq

An Iraqi wades through rainwater flooding the streets of Baghdad on March 7, 2025 (AP)
An Iraqi wades through rainwater flooding the streets of Baghdad on March 7, 2025 (AP)
TT
20

Washington Signals Gradual, Sweeping Sanctions on Iraq

An Iraqi wades through rainwater flooding the streets of Baghdad on March 7, 2025 (AP)
An Iraqi wades through rainwater flooding the streets of Baghdad on March 7, 2025 (AP)

Two American diplomats have revealed that the US administration is preparing to impose “comprehensive, phased sanctions” on Iraqi individuals and entities linked to government institutions, political factions, and armed groups.

Speculation in Baghdad has been mounting over Washington’s new approach since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House and vowed to escalate pressure on Iran’s regional influence.

A US diplomat, speaking anonymously to Asharq Al-Awsat, stated that a series of economic sanctions will be imposed on Iraqi groups under National Security Presidential Memorandum NSPM-2. Trump signed the directive on February 4, 2025, as part of his strategy to exert “maximum pressure on Iran and counter its malign influence.”

The diplomat confirmed that the sanctions will target individuals and entities accused of facilitating illicit trade, financial dealings, and resource transfers benefiting Iran. These could include government institutions, political organizations, or armed factions. The measures will extend to seemingly minor commercial activities, with US agencies monitoring a vast network of Iran-linked operations in Iraq. Even checkpoints controlled by Iranian-backed militias for tax collection could fall under sanction, the diplomat warned.

Crucially, the sanctions will not consider the official affiliations of those targeted—whether they operate under government cover, the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), or other armed factions. Washington’s approach, the diplomat said, aligns strictly with the parameters outlined in Trump’s directive.

One of the measures under review is reducing Iraq’s monthly cash transfers from its account at the US Federal Reserve, ensuring funds are only allocated for essential national needs and preventing any surplus from reaching Iranian-linked entities. However, the diplomat emphasized that this option depends on Baghdad’s adherence to financial reforms.

A second US diplomat, recently returned from Baghdad, stressed that the sanctions are not intended to destabilize Iraq’s political system but rather to dismantle Tehran’s economic influence. He expressed hope that the measures would empower Iraqis to assert greater independence in governance, though he acknowledged the risk of intensified power struggles among Iranian-linked factions as their financial resources dry up.

Iraqi officials have not responded to Asharq Al-Awsat’s requests for comment. The timing of the sanctions remains unclear, and some analysts believe Washington’s threats could be part of a broader strategy to pressure Iran into negotiations or push Iraqi leaders toward sweeping political changes.

Aqil Abbas, an expert on US affairs, warned that the planned sanctions are “serious” and could only be averted if Iran agrees to a diplomatic settlement, relinquishing both its nuclear ambitions and regional influence. “At best, the Trump administration seeks Iran’s voluntary withdrawal from its regional project,” he concluded.