Turkey Determined to Set up Base in Libya’s Watiya, Misrata

Pro-GNA forces in Tripoli, Libya September 22, 2018. (Reuters)
Pro-GNA forces in Tripoli, Libya September 22, 2018. (Reuters)
TT
20

Turkey Determined to Set up Base in Libya’s Watiya, Misrata

Pro-GNA forces in Tripoli, Libya September 22, 2018. (Reuters)
Pro-GNA forces in Tripoli, Libya September 22, 2018. (Reuters)

Turkey is planning on setting up permanent military bases in Libya, revealed a Turkish source to Reuters on Monday.

Ankara is seeking to keep a permanent foothold in the North African country at the al-Watiya airbase and the port of the coastal city of Misrata.

Talks are underway with the Tripoli-based Government of National Accord (GNA) over the issue, added the source.

Ankara threw its support behind the government in Tripoli last year after the GNA signed a maritime demarcation accord that it says gives Turkish drilling rights near Crete, but that is opposed by Greece, Cyprus and the European Union.

Meanwhile, Turkish Minister of Energy and Natural Resources Fatih Donmez revealed that GNA chief, Fayez al-Sarraj, had discussed with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan the boosting of cooperation in oil and gas drilling.

Sarraj had visited Ankara last week.

Donmez said his country was determined to build two major powerplants in Libya, adding that the state-operated oil company will begin drilling in the Mediterranean within three weeks.

Separately, Speaker of the east-based Libyan parliament, Aguila Saleh, was quick to deny rumors that he was planning on paying a visit to Turkey soon. He also denied receiving an invitation to travel to the country.

“This issue isn’t even up for debate,” he said.

Meanwhile, Libyan National Army (LNA) spokesman Ahmed al-Mismari revealed that seven Turkish warships were anchored off Libya’s coast. He accused Ankara of sending several mercenaries, troops and Turkish officers after several of the forces it backs suffered major losses in equipment and lives in ongoing fighting in the country.

He urged the international community to blacklist Erdogan as a “war criminal” for the atrocities his forces and mercenaries have committed against humanity in Libya.

The crimes of the pro-Erdogan militias south of Tripoli, in Tarhuna and al-Asaba have been documented, Mismari added.

He also urged the United Nations to immediately launch a probe in the recently unearthed mass graves in Tarhuna, but doubted that any such effort would be a success due to the militias’ control of the city.



Iran’s Allies Constrained in Confronting Israel

Armed Houthi supporters carry images of deceased military and political figures from Iran-aligned groups during a protest in Sanaa against Israeli airstrikes on Iran (EPA)
Armed Houthi supporters carry images of deceased military and political figures from Iran-aligned groups during a protest in Sanaa against Israeli airstrikes on Iran (EPA)
TT
20

Iran’s Allies Constrained in Confronting Israel

Armed Houthi supporters carry images of deceased military and political figures from Iran-aligned groups during a protest in Sanaa against Israeli airstrikes on Iran (EPA)
Armed Houthi supporters carry images of deceased military and political figures from Iran-aligned groups during a protest in Sanaa against Israeli airstrikes on Iran (EPA)

As war rages between Tehran and Tel Aviv, Iran may soon need to call upon its network of regional allies - groups it has armed and funded for years. But now, the so-called “Axis of Resistance” looks strained, fragmented, and far from ready.

On June 19, 2025, General Mohammad Reza Naqdi of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard urged Iran’s regional allies to take action to relieve mounting pressure on Tehran. At that point, Iran was entering its second week of heavy Israeli bombardment. Strategically, an Israeli strike on the Iranian capital once seemed unthinkable, but the regional terrain has since shifted. Iran’s supply routes are now disrupted, and its key proxy groups have either been neutralized or weakened.

According to The Times of Israel, Israel launched this war after nearly two years of systematically targeting Iran’s allies in Gaza, Lebanon, and Yemen. The 2023 Hamas attack on Israel had triggered a chain of retaliation that left many of Iran’s partners damaged or demoralized. With the Assad regime collapsed in Syria, Hezbollah weakened in Lebanon, and Hamas reduced to guerrilla tactics in Gaza, few proxies appear ready for a new confrontation.

In Gaza, Hamas has been forced into small ambushes and urban warfare, its rocket arsenal depleted and many senior leaders killed. Iranian communication channels with the group have also eroded. Israel’s targeted assassination of Mohammad Saeed Izadi, a key Quds Force commander linked to Palestinian factions, further strained coordination. For now, Hamas can offer little more than rhetorical support.

In Iraq, US forces have fortified their embassy in Baghdad, while withdrawing from bases such as Ain al-Asad. Iraqi factions loyal to Iran are posturing, threatening US interests should America enter the war. But most Iraqi leaders remain reluctant to drag the country into open conflict, knowing the consequences could be disastrous. Iran, too, is cautious about sacrificing Iraq’s political and economic value.

Hezbollah, reeling from the death of its longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah in a 2024 Israeli strike, is in disarray. Its military capacity and leadership have been significantly degraded. Though the party retains some strategic capabilities, domestic and regional pressures have so far restrained it from opening a major front.

In Yemen, the Houthis have emerged as Iran’s last viable card. They now play a key role in smuggling weapons and expanding Iranian influence into Africa. Should the US directly join Israel’s war, Tehran may finally authorize the Houthis to use their stockpile of ballistic missiles, signaling a decisive and potentially catastrophic new phase of the conflict.