Egypt Adheres to Agreement Preserving Its ‘Water Rights’

Talks made significant progress in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam’s (GERD) technical matters. (AFP)
Talks made significant progress in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam’s (GERD) technical matters. (AFP)
TT

Egypt Adheres to Agreement Preserving Its ‘Water Rights’

Talks made significant progress in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam’s (GERD) technical matters. (AFP)
Talks made significant progress in the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam’s (GERD) technical matters. (AFP)

Egypt, Ethiopia, and Sudan resumed negotiations on the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) for the sixth day on Tuesday, in which “legal matters” were discussed.

Egypt adheres to signing “a comprehensive agreement to fill and operate the dam, legally binding Ethiopia to protect its water rights before starting the filling process of its reservoir early July, an official source told Asharq Al-Awsat.

The source stressed the importance of completing “all technical and legal aspects of the agreement, including the dispute settlement mechanism, before announcing any positive outcomes of the negotiations.”

Talks have been held via videoconference, in the presence of observers from the United States, the European Union, and South Africa (President of the African Union).

Egypt pre-empted Tuesday’s meeting by brandishing “other options” in case parties fail to reach an agreement.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry said his country will have to discuss other options like resorting to the UN Security Council, affirming that Ethiopia’s position “doesn’t indicate positive results.”

Sudanese Minister of Irrigation and Water Resources Yasser Abbas has earlier revealed differences in the legal aspects on the agreement’s obligations and means of amendment.

Yet, he later announced that talks have so far made “significant progress in the technical matters.”

He said great progress has been made in the technical matters related to the dam's safety, the first filling and long-term operation, the exchange of data and environmental studies, and the Technical Committee for Cooperation.

The amount of flowing water throughout the year determines the number of years the dam will be filled, Abbas stressed, noting that future studies and environmental impacts are included in the negotiation documents.

Sudan had proposed raising the negotiations to the level of premiers in case a consensus is not reached, but Ethiopia and Egypt preferred to continue the negotiations at the current level, the Minister said.

A statement by Sudan’s Ministry of Irrigation on Monday pointed to the agreement among the three delegations to assign the legal teams to continue deliberations, in the observers’ presence.

According to Ethiopia's official news agency, parties reached an understanding during the meeting on Monday on the “first stage of filling, the volume of environmental flow, guidelines for the first stage of filling, approach to drought management rules, dam safety rules, the environmental and social impact of the assessment studies, and the entry of guidelines and rules into effect.”

Ethiopia stressed “the necessity of adopting an approach that guarantees the joint responsibility of the three countries in case of drought, while preserving the optimal operation of the dam."



Senior US Republican Demands Biden Administration Shut Gaza Aid Pier

 A US Army soldier gestures as trucks loaded with humanitarian aid arrive at the US-built floating pier Trident before reaching the beach on the coast of the Gaza Strip, Tuesday, June 25, 2024. (AP)
A US Army soldier gestures as trucks loaded with humanitarian aid arrive at the US-built floating pier Trident before reaching the beach on the coast of the Gaza Strip, Tuesday, June 25, 2024. (AP)
TT

Senior US Republican Demands Biden Administration Shut Gaza Aid Pier

 A US Army soldier gestures as trucks loaded with humanitarian aid arrive at the US-built floating pier Trident before reaching the beach on the coast of the Gaza Strip, Tuesday, June 25, 2024. (AP)
A US Army soldier gestures as trucks loaded with humanitarian aid arrive at the US-built floating pier Trident before reaching the beach on the coast of the Gaza Strip, Tuesday, June 25, 2024. (AP)

The Republican lawmaker who leads the House Armed Services Committee has written to the Biden administration formally demanding it shut down its aid pier off the coast Gaza, calling the operation ineffective, risky and a waste of money.

The offshore floating pier, announced by Biden in March as a response to the threat of famine in the Gaza Strip, was constructed off the coast of the enclave by the US military as a way to bring in food and other aid supplies.

The US military has been authorized to operate it until the end of July, but a US Agency for International Development official said this week that the administration could seek to extend it for at least another month.

"I urge the Administration to immediately cease this failed operation before further catastrophe occurs and consider alternative means of land and air-based humanitarian aid delivery," House Armed Services Committee Chairman Mike Rogers wrote in a letter seen by Reuters.

The letter, sent to White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, has not been previously reported.

Rogers has long opposed the pier and has called in the past for it to be dismantled, but he had not previously expressed that view in a formal written letter to the administration.

His armed services committee is the Pentagon's top oversight body in the House of Representatives, and formal requests from its chairman traditionally require a response from Pentagon officials.

Aid first began arriving via the US-built pier on May 17 into Gaza, where nearly all the 2.3 million residents have been displaced by Israel's campaign against the Hamas movement.

But rough seas have damaged the pier, forcing repairs, and poor weather has limited the number of days the pier has been operational. Most of the supplies that have reached the shore have yet to be distributed by UN aid agencies which say their operations have been limited by insecurity.

"As of June 19, JLOTS had only been operational about 10 days and had only moved 3,415 metric tons onto the beach in Gaza," Rogers wrote, using the US military's acronym for the pier system, known as Joint Logistics Over the Shore.

According to US military data, as of Tuesday, 8,332 pallets had been delivered via the pier. But around 84% of them have been sitting on Gaza's coast in a marshalling area waiting to be picked up by the United Nations for distribution.

The World Food Program paused deliveries earlier this month over security concerns.

Reuters was given rare access to the US military-run pier off Gaza on Tuesday and saw aid pallets being moved from a vessel onto the 1,200-foot (370 m)-long pier as it bobbed around with the incoming waves. The pallets were then taken by trucks to the coast.

The operation is complex, involving about 1,000 US military personnel. The Pentagon estimates the first 90 days of operation will cost about $230 million.

Rogers also noted that three US servicemembers suffered non-combat injuries while deployed on the operation.

"I urge the Administration to immediately cease this failed operation before further catastrophe occurs and consider alternative means of land and air-based humanitarian aid delivery," Rogers wrote.