Libyan Tribes Tasks Haftar with Announcing Resumption of Oil Production

An oil refinery in Libya's northern town of Ras Lanuf. (AFP)
An oil refinery in Libya's northern town of Ras Lanuf. (AFP)
TT

Libyan Tribes Tasks Haftar with Announcing Resumption of Oil Production

An oil refinery in Libya's northern town of Ras Lanuf. (AFP)
An oil refinery in Libya's northern town of Ras Lanuf. (AFP)

The “tribal movement” in Libya tossed the ball in the court of Libyan National Army (LNA) commander Khalifa Haftar, by declaring that it was tasking him with negotiating with the United Nations and international community the reopening of oil fields.

The east-based tribal leaders entrusted Haftar with finding ways to avoid oil resources from falling into the clutches of terrorist militias. They also called on him to reopen oil fields that have been shut since the beginning of the year.

The leaders met at the Zueitina oil port on Monday, declaring that the Libyan people have a right to benefit from oil revenues and forge ahead and rebuild their country.

LNA spokesman Ahmed al-Mismari welcomed the statement, adding that the military was “studying its next move in wake of this announcement.”

He said that the army always welcomes any move that would help resolve the Libyan crisis and dry up the sources of terrorism financing.

The oil facilities file, which used to be managed by tribes and the people, is now in the hands of the military that has the duty to maintain their security, he stressed.

Meanwhile, Government of National Accord deputy defense minister Salaheddine al-Namroush said his forces will not allow “saboteurs” to meddle with energy resources, including oil fields and ports.

He vowed that they will not fall victim to “exploitation or extortion” or the clutches of “mercenaries and criminal gangs.”

Separately, commander of the Turkish naval forces, Adnan Ozbal, made a surprise visit to Tripoli on Tuesday.

He was received by GNA military officials and visited the Abu Sitta Naval Base amid speculation that he was set to discuss the inauguration of a Turkish naval base in Tripoli.



Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
TT

Israel Sees More to Do on Lebanon Ceasefire

FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon,  January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo
FILE PHOTO: A car drives past damaged buildings in Naqoura, near the border with Israel, southern Lebanon, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Ali Hankir/File Photo

Israel said on Thursday the terms of a ceasefire with Hezbollah were not being implemented fast enough and there was more work to do, while the Iran-backed group urged pressure to ensure Israeli troops leave south Lebanon by Monday as set out in the deal.

The deal stipulates that Israeli troops withdraw from south Lebanon, Hezbollah remove fighters and weapons from the area and Lebanese troops deploy there - all within a 60-day timeframe which will conclude on Monday at 4 a.m (0200 GMT).

The deal, brokered by the United States and France, ended more than a year of hostilities triggered by the Gaza war. The fighting peaked with a major Israeli offensive that displaced more than 1.2 million people in Lebanon and left Hezbollah severely weakened.

"There have been positive movements where the Lebanese army and UNIFIL have taken the place of Hezbollah forces, as stipulated in the agreement," Israeli government spokesmen David Mencer told reporters, referring to UN peacekeepers in Lebanon.

"We've also made clear that these movements have not been fast enough, and there is much more work to do," he said, affirming that Israel wanted the agreement to continue.

Mencer did not directly respond to questions about whether Israel had requested an extension of the deal or say whether Israeli forces would remain in Lebanon after Monday's deadline.

Hezbollah said in a statement that there had been leaks talking about Israel postponing its withdrawal beyond the 60-day period, and that any breach of the agreement would be unacceptable.
The statement said that possibility required everyone, especially Lebanese political powers, to pile pressure on the states which sponsored the deal to ensure "the implementation of the full (Israeli) withdrawal and the deployment of the Lebanese army to the last inch of Lebanese territory and the return of the people to their villages quickly.”

Any delay beyond the 60 days would mark a blatant violation of the deal with which the Lebanese state would have to deal "through all means and methods guaranteed by international charters" to recover Lebanese land "from the occupation's clutches," Hezbollah said.