Mohammed Baasiri: Senior Banker and Businessman Becomes Prominent Premiership Candidate

Caricature of Mohammed Baasiri
Caricature of Mohammed Baasiri
TT

Mohammed Baasiri: Senior Banker and Businessman Becomes Prominent Premiership Candidate

Caricature of Mohammed Baasiri
Caricature of Mohammed Baasiri

The name of Mohammed Baasiri is widely discussed by Lebanon’s financial and political circles. With a remarkable and rapid dynamism, he joined the club of strong candidates for the premiership. This was preceded by an explicit reference made by US Ambassador to Beirut Dorothy Shea, to a senior security official, regarding the importance of his reappointment as Deputy Governor of Banque du Liban. “No Baasiri, No Money”, the official quoted the ambassador as saying.

The information, broadly circulated and reported by many sources, was not denied by the concerned party. Baasiri, however, remains wary and says: “I heard the statement from media sources and I am not concerned with its denial or confirmation.”

Lebanese banker and businessman Mohamed Baasiri does not hide his keenness to have his position as deputy governor renewed. This is a position he held for two consecutive terms (2009 - 2019), and he personally supervised a number of directorates at the Bank, in addition to his previous membership in the Higher Banking Commission and his former presidency of the National Coordination Committee to combat money laundering.

Before his appointment as Deputy Governor, he chaired the Banking Supervision Committee from June 1990 to mid-2000 and then was appointed for a year as a resident advisor to the International Monetary Fund at the Central Bank of Oman.

In 2001, he was chosen to be the first Secretary-General of the Special Investigation Authority - the newly established Financial Information Unit in Lebanon.

According to Baasiri, Lebanon’s contacts with the IMF must be dissociated from internal political bickering.

“This is a very significant indication at a time when we, as an official and financial team, are engaged in difficult and complicated negotiations with the IMF experts,” he said.

Baasiri expresses his surprise at “all the fanfare about his relations with the Americans.”

“It is an institutional relationship that began nearly two decades ago, when I was the secretary of the BDL’s Special Investigation Commission, which is responsible for combating money laundering and terrorism financing,” he remarked.

He continued: “As a representative of my country, I had a prominent role in establishing the MENAFATF (the Financial Action Task Force for the MENA region). Through this institution, direct relationships have emerged with the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve and major US banks.”

“Then I maintained these relations through my position as Deputy Governor, as I was officially charged with following up on financial laws and sanctions issued by the US and international financial authorities,” he added.

Indeed, the Special Investigation Commission under Baasiri has accomplished many achievements, such as removing Lebanon from the FATF list of non-cooperative countries and joining the Egmont Group.

Asked about the nature of the desired reforms that comply with the policies adopted by the IMF, Baasiri said: “As the Lebanese government decided to resort to the IMF for financial aid, which is the only option available in the prevailing circumstances, this decision should be based on a firm conviction that this international financial institution is automatically subject to the positions of its major stakeholders, particularly the United States, Japan and the European Union countries.”

“There is no time for further delays… The government should immediately start approving the administrative and practical executive steps to reform the electricity sector, which has drained about USD 40 billion in two consecutive decades, and continues to consume about USD 2 billion annually,” the senior banker underlined.

Baasiri also emphasized the need for reforming the public sector.

“Until now, we have not heard of any promising action in the electricity and public sectors, which inflict the heaviest burden on the state treasury,” he noted.



What to Know about Sudden Gains of the Opposition in Syria's 13-year War and Why it Matters

Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)
Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)
TT

What to Know about Sudden Gains of the Opposition in Syria's 13-year War and Why it Matters

Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)
Fighters seize a Syrian Army tank near the international M5 highway in the area Zarbah which was taken over by anti-government factions on November 29, 2024, as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) group and allied groups continue their offensive in Syria's northern Aleppo province against government forces. (Photo by Rami al SAYED / AFP)

The 13-year civil war in Syria has roared back into prominence with a surprise opposition offensive on Aleppo, one of Syria's largest cities and an ancient business hub. The push is among the opposition’s strongest in years in a war whose destabilizing effects have rippled far beyond the country's borders.
It was the first opposition attack on Aleppo since 2016, when a brutal air campaign by Russian warplanes helped Syrian President Bashar Assad retake the northwestern city. Intervention by Russia, Iran and Iranian-allied Hezbollah and other groups has allowed Assad to remain in power, within the 70% of Syria under his control.
The surge in fighting has raised the prospect of another violent front reopening in the Middle East, at a time when US-backed Israel is fighting Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, both Iranian-allied groups.
Robert Ford, the last-serving US ambassador to Syria, pointed to months of Israeli strikes on Syrian and Hezbollah targets in the area, and to Israel’s ceasefire with Hezbollah in Lebanon this week, as factors providing Syria’s opposition groups with the opportunity to advance.
Here's a look at some of the key aspects of the new fighting:
Why does the fighting at Aleppo matter? Assad has been at war with opposition forces seeking his overthrow for 13 years, a conflict that's killed an estimated half-million people. Some 6.8 million Syrians have fled the country, a refugee flow that helped change the political map in Europe by fueling anti-immigrant far-right movements.
The roughly 30% of the country not under Assad is controlled by a range of opposition forces and foreign troops. The US has about 900 troops in northeast Syria, far from Aleppo, to guard against a resurgence by the ISIS extremist group. Both the US and Israel conduct occasional strikes in Syria against government forces and Iran-allied militias. Türkiye has forces in Syria as well, and has influence with the broad alliance of opposition forces storming Aleppo.
Coming after years with few sizeable changes in territory between Syria's warring parties, the fighting “has the potential to be really quite, quite consequential and potentially game-changing,” if Syrian government forces prove unable to hold their ground, said Charles Lister, a longtime Syria analyst with the US-based Middle East Institute. Risks include if ISIS fighters see it as an opening, Lister said.
Ford said the fighting in Aleppo would become more broadly destabilizing if it drew Russia and Türkiye— each with its own interests to protect in Syria — into direct heavy fighting against each other. -
What do we know about the group leading the offensive on Aleppo? The US and UN have long designated the opposition force leading the attack at Aleppo — Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, known by its initials HTS — as a terrorist organization.
Its leader, Abu Mohammed al-Golani, emerged as the leader of al-Qaeda's Syria branch in 2011, in the first months of Syria's war. His fight was an unwelcome intervention to many in Syria's opposition, who hoped to keep the fight against Assad's brutal rule untainted by violent extremism.
Golani early on claimed responsibility for deadly bombings, pledged to attack Western forces and sent religious police to enforce modest dress by women.
Golani has sought to remake himself in recent years. He renounced his al-Qaeda ties in 2016. He's disbanded his religious police force, cracked down on extremist groups in his territory, and portrayed himself as a protector of other religions. That includes last year allowing the first Christian Mass in the city of Idlib in years.
What's the history of Aleppo in the war? At the crossroads of trade routes and empires for thousands of years, Aleppo is one of the centers of commerce and culture in the Middle East.
Aleppo was home to 2.3 million people before the war. Opposition forces seized the east side of the city in 2012, and it became the proudest symbol of the advance of armed opposition factions.
In 2016, government forces backed by Russian airstrikes laid siege to the city. Russian shells, missiles and crude barrel bombs — fuel canisters or other containers loaded with explosives and metal — methodically leveled neighborhoods. Starving and under siege, the opposition surrendered Aleppo that year.
The Russian military's entry was the turning point in the war, allowing Assad to stay on in the territory he held.
This year, Israeli airstrikes in Aleppo have hit Hezbollah weapons depots and Syrian forces, among other targets, according to an independent monitoring group. Israel rarely acknowledges strikes at Aleppo and other government-held areas of Syria.